• Study Resource
  • Explore Categories
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Fractions don`t exist
Fractions don`t exist

Problem Set 2 - Stony Brook Mathematics
Problem Set 2 - Stony Brook Mathematics

Slides Chapter 3. Laws of large numbers
Slides Chapter 3. Laws of large numbers

Full text
Full text

Rational Numbers, Divisibility and the Quotient Remainder Theorem
Rational Numbers, Divisibility and the Quotient Remainder Theorem

Rational Numbers, Divisibility and the Quotient Remainder Theorem
Rational Numbers, Divisibility and the Quotient Remainder Theorem

a theorem in the theory of numbers.
a theorem in the theory of numbers.

For a pdf file
For a pdf file

... Clearly, n > p. Since p is the largest prime number, n cannot be a prime number. In other words, n is composite. Let q be any prime number. Because of the way n is constructed, when n is divided by q the remainder is 1. That is, n is not a multiple of q. This contradicts the Fundamental Theorem of A ...
Chapter 2 A Primer of Mathematical Writing (Proofs)
Chapter 2 A Primer of Mathematical Writing (Proofs)

8Mathstandards unit 5
8Mathstandards unit 5

Full text
Full text

x| • |y
x| • |y

Worksheet
Worksheet

Give reasons for all steps in a proof
Give reasons for all steps in a proof

Give reasons for all steps in a proof
Give reasons for all steps in a proof

4.2 - The Mean Value Theorem
4.2 - The Mean Value Theorem

Proof Example: The Irrationality of √ 2 During the lecture a student
Proof Example: The Irrationality of √ 2 During the lecture a student

... By definition of x (that is: the positive number y such that y 2 = x), we obtain n2 /m2 = 2 and from this n2 = 2 m2 . Thus 2 divides n2 , from here 2 divides n (because 2 is prime), therefore there exists a k such that n = 2 k. We replace this into the previous equality and obtain 4 k 2 = 2 m2 , thu ...
Number Theory I: Divisibility Divisibility Primes and composite
Number Theory I: Divisibility Divisibility Primes and composite

Full text
Full text

rendering
rendering

For a pdf file
For a pdf file

... The above equation implies that b2 is even and hence b is even. Since we know a is even this means that a and b have 2 as a common factor which contradicts the assumption that a and b have no common factors. ...
Proofs Homework Set 10
Proofs Homework Set 10

Infinitive Петухова
Infinitive Петухова

Give reasons for all steps in a proof
Give reasons for all steps in a proof

Student Activities for Theorem 15: Converse of Pythagoras` Theorem
Student Activities for Theorem 15: Converse of Pythagoras` Theorem

< 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 >

Fermat's Last Theorem



In number theory, Fermat's Last Theorem (sometimes called Fermat's conjecture, especially in older texts) states that no three positive integers a, b, and c can satisfy the equation an + bn = cn for any integer value of n greater than two. The cases n = 1 and n = 2 were known to have infinitely many solutions. This theorem was first conjectured by Pierre de Fermat in 1637 in the margin of a copy of Arithmetica where he claimed he had a proof that was too large to fit in the margin. The first successful proof was released in 1994 by Andrew Wiles, and formally published in 1995, after 358 years of effort by mathematicians. The theretofore unsolved problem stimulated the development of algebraic number theory in the 19th century and the proof of the modularity theorem in the 20th century. It is among the most notable theorems in the history of mathematics and prior to its proof it was in the Guinness Book of World Records for ""most difficult mathematical problems"".
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report