• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Problem solving and proving via generalisation
Problem solving and proving via generalisation

... BB ! and CC ! connecting corresponding vertices are concurrent in a point O, then the respective intersections X, Y and Z of the corresponding sides (extended if necessary) are collinear (lie on a line), and of course, conversely, the other way round. Now this theorem is quite difficult to prove in ...
Solutions - U.I.U.C. Math
Solutions - U.I.U.C. Math

Predicate logic - Teaching-WIKI
Predicate logic - Teaching-WIKI

... “Anyone passing his Intelligent System exam and winning the lottery is happy. But any student who studies for an exam or is lucky can pass all his exams. John did not study but John is lucky. Anyone who is lucky wins the lottery. Mary did not win the lottery, however Mary passed her IS exam. Gary wo ...
Day04-InductionProofForVideo - Rose
Day04-InductionProofForVideo - Rose

Predicate logic
Predicate logic

... “Anyone passing his Intelligent System exam and winning the lottery is happy. But any student who studies for an exam or is lucky can pass all his exams. John did not study but John is lucky. Anyone who is lucky wins the lottery. Mary did not win the lottery, however Mary passed her IS exam. Gary wo ...
03_Artificial_Intelligence-PredicateLogic
03_Artificial_Intelligence-PredicateLogic

03_Artificial_Intelligence-PredicateLogic
03_Artificial_Intelligence-PredicateLogic

... “Anyone passing his Artificial Intelligence exam and winning the lottery is happy. But any student who studies for an exam or is lucky can pass all his exams. John did not study but John is lucky. Anyone who is lucky wins the lottery. Mary did not win the lottery, however Mary passed her IS exam. Ga ...
Predicate Logic
Predicate Logic

CPS130, Lecture 1: Introduction to Algorithms
CPS130, Lecture 1: Introduction to Algorithms

... Definition 1P: A proposition is a statement that is either true or false but not both. For example, “Betsy is a smart dog”, is a proposition that is true. We might call it p1. Definition 1B: A Boolean expression is a variable, say xi, which takes on value xi = 1 or xi = 0 but not both. We could be m ...
Logic primer
Logic primer

Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs

... P is a sufficient condition for Q Q if P Q whenever P Q is a necessary condition for P ...
p q
p q

... Common phrasings for the biconditional • p if and only if q • p is necessary and equivalent for q • p is equivalent to q ...
( )(x2 ( )3 + 73 ( ( )2 (
( )(x2 ( )3 + 73 ( ( )2 (

4 slides/page
4 slides/page

Predicate Logic Review
Predicate Logic Review

... matter, because if φ is a closed sentence, its truth won’t vary from one assignment to the next.) The strategy for defining truth in a model that we have just outlined is due in its essentials to Alfred Tarski. It was one of his great achievements, because it showed logicians how to use semantic not ...
CS173: Discrete Math
CS173: Discrete Math

Document
Document

... Boolean Algebras (Chapter 11) Boolean algebra provides the operations and the rules for working with the set {0, 1}. These are the rules that underlie electronic and optical circuits, and the methods we will discuss are fundamental to VLSI design. ...
CS173: Discrete Math
CS173: Discrete Math

Chapter 13 Review
Chapter 13 Review

Practice Problem Set 1
Practice Problem Set 1

... • These problems will not be graded. • Mutual discussion and discussion with the instructor/TA is strongly encouraged. 1. [From HW1, Autumn 2011] Use the proof system of first order logic studied in class to prove each of the following sequents. You must indicate which proof rule you are applying at ...
Exam 1 Solutions for Spring 2014
Exam 1 Solutions for Spring 2014

Policy Debate - Littlemiamischools.org
Policy Debate - Littlemiamischools.org

Les énoncés rencontrés pendant l`exposé Problem 1 : Multiples of 3
Les énoncés rencontrés pendant l`exposé Problem 1 : Multiples of 3

2.4 FORMULAS
2.4 FORMULAS

ppt
ppt

< 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 >

Boolean satisfiability problem

In computer science, the Boolean Satisfiability Problem (sometimes called Propositional Satisfiability Problem and abbreviated as SATISFIABILITY or SAT) is the problem of determining if there exists an interpretation that satisfies a given Boolean formula. In other words, it asks whether the variables of a given Boolean formula can be consistently replaced by the values TRUE or FALSE in such a way that the formula evaluates to TRUE. If this is the case, the formula is called satisfiable. On the other hand, if no such assignment exists, the function expressed by the formula is identically FALSE for all possible variable assignments and the formula is unsatisfiable. For example, the formula ""a AND NOT b"" is satisfiable because one can find the values a = TRUE and b = FALSE, which make (a AND NOT b) = TRUE. In contrast, ""a AND NOT a"" is unsatisfiable.SAT is one of the first problems that was proven to be NP-complete. This means that all problems in the complexity class NP, which includes a wide range of natural decision and optimization problems, are at most as difficult to solve as SAT. There is no known algorithm that efficiently solves SAT, and it is generally believed that no such algorithm exists; yet this belief has not been proven mathematically, and resolving the question whether SAT has an efficient algorithm is equivalent to the P versus NP problem, which is the most famous open problem in the theory of computing.Despite the fact that no algorithms are known that solve SAT efficiently, correctly, and for all possible input instances, many instances of SAT that occur in practice, such as in artificial intelligence, circuit design and automatic theorem proving, can actually be solved rather efficiently using heuristical SAT-solvers. Such algorithms are not believed to be efficient on all SAT instances, but experimentally these algorithms tend to work well for many practical applications.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report