• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
p  q
p q

compactness slides
compactness slides

... and F. By the unique readability theorem C ∗ is freely generated from the set of sentence symbols by the functions in F. This guarantees the uniqueness of the extension of truth assignment v to v̄ by the recursion theorem below. ...
ppt
ppt

... S1S2 is true andS2S1 is true Simple recursive process evaluates an arbitrary sentence, e.g., P1,2  (P2,2  P3,1) = true  (true  false) = true  true = true ...
True
True

Logic 1
Logic 1

... 1.16 Rewrite the first condition as a = −b − c. 1.17 (17a) True. Remember that 0 is an integer. (17b) False. Find a counterexample. ...
Problem 1: First derivative: Productrule
Problem 1: First derivative: Productrule

Godel incompleteness
Godel incompleteness

p and q
p and q

7.5.2 Proof by Resolution
7.5.2 Proof by Resolution

Sample Unix Session
Sample Unix Session

... • Mathematical theory of logic. • Shannon was the first to use Boolean Algebra to solve problems in electronic circuit design. (1938) ...
Notes on Propositional and Predicate Logic
Notes on Propositional and Predicate Logic

... • Simplify all subexpressions of the form (not (not p)) to p • Move all occurrences of or “inside” occurrences of and • Simplify all or- expressions for example by rewriting (or (or p q) r) as (or p q r) , and similarly for and Each premise is converted to conjunctive normal form in this way. Then t ...
Discrete Mathematics Chapter 1 The Foundations: Logic and Proof
Discrete Mathematics Chapter 1 The Foundations: Logic and Proof

Automata theory
Automata theory

... In this chapter we present a logical formalism for the declarative description of regular languages. We use logical formulas to describe properties of words, and logical operators to construct complex properties out of simpler ones. We then show how to automatically translate a formula describing a ...
A simplified form of condensed detachment - Research Online
A simplified form of condensed detachment - Research Online

Truth Tables and Deductive Reasoning
Truth Tables and Deductive Reasoning

Aula 3: Boolean Algebra
Aula 3: Boolean Algebra

... Formal analysis techniques for digital circuits are based on the work of George Boole (1815-1865). In 1854, he invented a two-valued algebraic system, now called Boolean Algebra. Using this algebra, one can formulate propositions that are true or false, combine them to make new propositions and dete ...
WhichQuantifiersLogical
WhichQuantifiersLogical

Chapter 2. First Order Logic.
Chapter 2. First Order Logic.

... If F is an n-ary function on A and G1 , . . . , Gn are each k-ary functions on A then we can define a k-ary function H on A by composition as H(a1 , . . . , ak ) = F (G1 (a1 , . . . , ak ), . . . , Gn (a1 , . . . , ak )) for all a1 , . . . , ak ∈ A. For example, from + and · on N we can define (x + ...
pdf
pdf

1 Introduction 2 Formal logic
1 Introduction 2 Formal logic

Document
Document

... of p, q, and r is true and at least one is false). Solution: Not satisfiable. Check each possible assignment of truth values to the propositional variables and none will make the proposition true. ...
Formalizing Basic First Order Model Theory
Formalizing Basic First Order Model Theory

Logic Review
Logic Review

... Logical Consequence x2 There are two ways of thinking about one formula ‘logically following’ from another: Syntactic Criteria: formula 1 is provable (given the system’s rules) from formula 2. Semantic Criteria: formula 1 evaluates as true whenever formula 2 does. ...
STEPS for INDIRECT PROOF - Fairfield Public Schools
STEPS for INDIRECT PROOF - Fairfield Public Schools

... 2) Use some of the “GIVENS” and other geometry truths to show your assumption from step 1 can’t be true, either because it CONTRADICTS one of these facts, or it leads to a statement that is ABSURD! (like above when we used the “GIVEN” angle measures to CONTRADICT the equilateral triangle theorem tha ...
Propositional Logic - University of San Francisco
Propositional Logic - University of San Francisco

< 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 25 >

Boolean satisfiability problem

In computer science, the Boolean Satisfiability Problem (sometimes called Propositional Satisfiability Problem and abbreviated as SATISFIABILITY or SAT) is the problem of determining if there exists an interpretation that satisfies a given Boolean formula. In other words, it asks whether the variables of a given Boolean formula can be consistently replaced by the values TRUE or FALSE in such a way that the formula evaluates to TRUE. If this is the case, the formula is called satisfiable. On the other hand, if no such assignment exists, the function expressed by the formula is identically FALSE for all possible variable assignments and the formula is unsatisfiable. For example, the formula ""a AND NOT b"" is satisfiable because one can find the values a = TRUE and b = FALSE, which make (a AND NOT b) = TRUE. In contrast, ""a AND NOT a"" is unsatisfiable.SAT is one of the first problems that was proven to be NP-complete. This means that all problems in the complexity class NP, which includes a wide range of natural decision and optimization problems, are at most as difficult to solve as SAT. There is no known algorithm that efficiently solves SAT, and it is generally believed that no such algorithm exists; yet this belief has not been proven mathematically, and resolving the question whether SAT has an efficient algorithm is equivalent to the P versus NP problem, which is the most famous open problem in the theory of computing.Despite the fact that no algorithms are known that solve SAT efficiently, correctly, and for all possible input instances, many instances of SAT that occur in practice, such as in artificial intelligence, circuit design and automatic theorem proving, can actually be solved rather efficiently using heuristical SAT-solvers. Such algorithms are not believed to be efficient on all SAT instances, but experimentally these algorithms tend to work well for many practical applications.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report