• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
A Note on Bootstrapping Intuitionistic Bounded Arithmetic
A Note on Bootstrapping Intuitionistic Bounded Arithmetic

Document
Document

... real number 1 < r < 2 with r2 = 2? We need an axiom about real numbers that isn’t taught in high school. Notation: R = the set of real numbers, Q = the set of rational numbers (“Q” for “quotient”), Z = the set of integers (“Z” for “Zahlen” which is German for “number”), and N = {1,2,3,…} the set of ...
[Write on board:
[Write on board:

... real number 1 < r < 2 with r2 = 2? We need an axiom about real numbers that isn’t taught in high school. Notation: R = the set of real numbers, Q = the set of rational numbers (“Q” for “quotient”), Z = the set of integers (“Z” for “Zahlen” which is German for “number”), and N = {1,2,3,…} the set of ...
Notes
Notes

CS1231 - Lecture 09
CS1231 - Lecture 09

A computably stable structure with no Scott family of finitary formulas
A computably stable structure with no Scott family of finitary formulas

Default Reasoning in a Terminological Logic
Default Reasoning in a Terminological Logic

... The field of TLs has lately been an active area of research, with the attention of researchers especially focusing on the investigation of their logical and computational properties. Nevertheless, few researchers have addressed the problem of extending these logics with the ability to perform defaul ...
Roland HINNION ULTRAFILTERS (WITH DENSE ELEMENTS
Roland HINNION ULTRAFILTERS (WITH DENSE ELEMENTS

Contents MATH/MTHE 217 Algebraic Structures with Applications Lecture Notes
Contents MATH/MTHE 217 Algebraic Structures with Applications Lecture Notes

Sets
Sets

Linearly Ordered Topological Spaces and Weak
Linearly Ordered Topological Spaces and Weak

... which will lead to the addition of extra points to a LOTS to obtain a weak domain representable space rather than the LOTS itself being weak domain representable. As is customary we will use ↑ a to represent the set {b ∈ X : a ≤ b} and ↓ a to represent the set {b ∈ X : b ≤ a}. Definition 3. For all ...
Reducing Propositional Theories in Equilibrium Logic to
Reducing Propositional Theories in Equilibrium Logic to

(pdf)
(pdf)

... Definition 1.9. A model or structure M for some language L is an ordered triple M = (A, I, β), where A is a nonempty set, β is a variable assignment function and I is an interpretation function with domain the set of all constants, relations and function symbols in L such that: (1) For every consta ...
countability diagonalization
countability diagonalization

... Example: if x=a then f(x) is b; if x≠a then f(x) is a. S’ cannot be anywhere in the matrix, since it will differ from every string by at least one symbol. But we have listed all elements in the matrix. Contradiction! The set must be uncountably infinite! CS340-Discrete Structures ...
Non-classical metatheory for non-classical logics
Non-classical metatheory for non-classical logics

Sets, Numbers, and Logic
Sets, Numbers, and Logic

Bounded Functional Interpretation
Bounded Functional Interpretation

Mathematics - Textbooks Online
Mathematics - Textbooks Online

Solutions to assignment 5
Solutions to assignment 5

STANDARD COMPLETENESS THEOREM FOR ΠMTL 1
STANDARD COMPLETENESS THEOREM FOR ΠMTL 1

... (1) if x, y ∈ F , then x ∗ y ∈ F , (2) if x ∈ F , x ≤ y, then y ∈ F . LEMMA 2.6. For any filter F in a ΠMTL-algebra L, let us define the following equivalence relation in L: x ∼F y iff x → y ∈ F and y → x ∈ F . Then ∼F is a congruence and the quotient L/F is a ΠMTL-algebra. We will denote the equiva ...
Mathematical Logic Fall 2004 Professor R. Moosa Contents
Mathematical Logic Fall 2004 Professor R. Moosa Contents

Document
Document

...  Example: Prove that there are infinitely many prime numbers  Proof:  Assume there are not infinitely many prime numbers, therefore they are listable, i.e. p1,p2,…,pn  Consider the number q = p1p2…pn+1. q is not divisible by any of the listed primes  Therefore, q is a prime. However, it was not ...
Mathematische Logik - WS14/15 Iosif Petrakis, Felix Quirin Weitk¨ amper November 13, 2014
Mathematische Logik - WS14/15 Iosif Petrakis, Felix Quirin Weitk¨ amper November 13, 2014

Plural Quantifiers
Plural Quantifiers

The Perfect Set Theorem and Definable Wellorderings of the
The Perfect Set Theorem and Definable Wellorderings of the

... THEOREM. Let r be a reasonablepointclass and let M be a perfect set basis for r. If < is a wellorderingof a set of reals and < e r, then the field of < (i.e. the set {a: a < a}) is containedin M. PROOF. Without loss of generality we can assume that the field of < is contained in 20 so that we can wo ...
< 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 37 >

Naive set theory

Naive set theory is one of several theories of sets used in the discussion of the foundations of mathematics. Unlike axiomatic set theories, which are defined using a formal logic, naive set theory is defined informally, in natural language. It describes the aspects of mathematical sets familiar in discrete mathematics (for example Venn diagrams and symbolic reasoning about their Boolean algebra), and suffices for the everyday usage of set theory concepts in contemporary mathematics.Sets are of great importance in mathematics; in fact, in modern formal treatments, most mathematical objects (numbers, relations, functions, etc.) are defined in terms of sets. Naive set theory can be seen as a stepping-stone to more formal treatments, and suffices for many purposes.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report