• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Language of Logic 1-2B - Winterrowd-math
Language of Logic 1-2B - Winterrowd-math

Propositional Logic, Predicates, and Equivalence
Propositional Logic, Predicates, and Equivalence

pdf
pdf

Handout 2 - The Logic Manual
Handout 2 - The Logic Manual

... The argument with all sentences in Γ as premisses and φ as conclusion is valid if and only if there is no L1 -structure under which: (i) all sentences in Γ are true; and (ii) φ is false. Notation: when this argument is valid we write Γ  φ. {P → ¬Q, Q} |= ¬P means that the argument whose premises ar ...
Exercises: Sufficiently expressive/strong
Exercises: Sufficiently expressive/strong

PHILOSOPHY 326 / MATHEMATICS 307 SYMBOLIC LOGIC This
PHILOSOPHY 326 / MATHEMATICS 307 SYMBOLIC LOGIC This

PDF
PDF

Lecture 34 Notes
Lecture 34 Notes

Mary fixed the chair with glue
Mary fixed the chair with glue

... knowledge is inferred by inference rules such as modus ponens or resolution. If the computer can find a path from given facts to a new theorem, the path corresponds to a proof and finding such a path constitutes an example of artificial intelligence ...
Heuristic Search - Dr. Sadi Evren SEKER
Heuristic Search - Dr. Sadi Evren SEKER

... Let f=~(x+ ~y(~x+z)). (a) Write out the truth table for f. (b) Convert the truth table to CNF. (c) Show the series of steps DPLL makes while solving the resulting formula. Assume variables chosen for splitting in the order x, y, z. Using the same f from the first part, follow the 3-CNF conversion al ...
"translator" and - Speak Your Languages
"translator" and - Speak Your Languages

Negative translation - Homepages of UvA/FNWI staff
Negative translation - Homepages of UvA/FNWI staff

22C/55:181 1 Well-formed Formulas for Program Proving To discuss
22C/55:181 1 Well-formed Formulas for Program Proving To discuss

POSSIBLE WORLDS AND MANY TRUTH VALUES
POSSIBLE WORLDS AND MANY TRUTH VALUES

Logic of Natural Language Semantics: Presuppositions and
Logic of Natural Language Semantics: Presuppositions and

Homework 5
Homework 5

slides - Department of Computer Science
slides - Department of Computer Science

... Theorem (and Witnessing Theorem) out some axioms to get a universal theory that is a we need: conservative extension of TC 1. TC is universal theory 2. Make sure all terms in language describe functions from C; 3. We can assume We add function symbols (with defining axioms) in C. And the C-closure o ...
The Substitution Interpretation of the Quantifiers
The Substitution Interpretation of the Quantifiers

Howework 8
Howework 8

Desired articles in the philosophy of language If you are interested
Desired articles in the philosophy of language If you are interested

Document
Document

1. New Proposals: a. For mainly cosmetic reasons and to make
1. New Proposals: a. For mainly cosmetic reasons and to make

PHIL012 Class Notes
PHIL012 Class Notes

... • Notes are online. • Syllabus has been updated. • URL for web page: ...
Lecture 2a: First-order Logic over words Formal Semantics for FO(<)
Lecture 2a: First-order Logic over words Formal Semantics for FO(<)

... u, [x 7→ i] |= ϕ1 ∨ ϕ2 iff u, [x 7→ i] |= ϕ1 or u, [x 7→ i] |= ϕ2 and by induction hypothesis, u, [x 7→ i] |= ϕk iff v, [x 7→ j] |= ϕk for k ∈ 1, 2. The result follows. Case 4: ϕ = ∃x. ψ If u, [x 7→ i] |= ∃x. ψ then there is a position i0 in u such that u, [x 7→ i0 ] |= ψ. Further since u ≡α v, ther ...
Mathematics is a language of symbols, grammar and logic. It greatly
Mathematics is a language of symbols, grammar and logic. It greatly

< 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 >

Interpretation (logic)

An interpretation is an assignment of meaning to the symbols of a formal language. Many formal languages used in mathematics, logic, and theoretical computer science are defined in solely syntactic terms, and as such do not have any meaning until they are given some interpretation. The general study of interpretations of formal languages is called formal semantics.The most commonly studied formal logics are propositional logic, predicate logic and their modal analogs, and for these there are standard ways of presenting an interpretation. In these contexts an interpretation is a function that provides the extension of symbols and strings of symbols of an object language. For example, an interpretation function could take the predicate T (for ""tall"") and assign it the extension {a} (for ""Abraham Lincoln""). Note that all our interpretation does is assign the extension {a} to the non-logical constant T, and does not make a claim about whether T is to stand for tall and 'a' for Abraham Lincoln. Nor does logical interpretation have anything to say about logical connectives like 'and', 'or' and 'not'. Though we may take these symbols to stand for certain things or concepts, this is not determined by the interpretation function.An interpretation often (but not always) provides a way to determine the truth values of sentences in a language. If a given interpretation assigns the value True to a sentence or theory, the interpretation is called a model of that sentence or theory.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report