• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Handling Function Symbols in the DLV Grounder
Handling Function Symbols in the DLV Grounder

Lecture 2
Lecture 2

... • Searching a semantic net involves traversing the net systematically (or in some cases, not so systematically), examining nodes, looking for a goal node. • Clearly following a cyclic path through the net is pointless because following A,B,C,D,A will not lead to any solution that could not be reache ...
6.3 Solving Systems of Linear Equations by the Addition Method
6.3 Solving Systems of Linear Equations by the Addition Method

... Addition Property of Equality y=1 Solve for y. Step 2: Solve for the eliminated variable x using either original equation. 2x + 3y = 11 Choose the first equation. 2x + 3(1) = 11 Substitute 1 for y. 2x + 3 = 11 Solve for x. 2x = 8 x=4 Since x = 4 and y = 1, the solution is (4, 1). Check: See if (4, 1 ...
Solving Systems of Linear Equations Symbolically
Solving Systems of Linear Equations Symbolically

C.P. Geometry Summer Assignment 2016
C.P. Geometry Summer Assignment 2016

... Section 2: Simplifying Algebraic Expressions The difference between an expression and an equation is that an expression doesn’t have an equal sign. Expressions can only be simplified, not solved. Simplifying an expression often involves combining like terms. Terms are like if and only if they have t ...
Unit 4 Test Review Solutions
Unit 4 Test Review Solutions

An Alternative Arithmetic Approach to the Water Jugs Problem
An Alternative Arithmetic Approach to the Water Jugs Problem

GOT GAME? - Duluth High School
GOT GAME? - Duluth High School

3-1 Using Graphs and Tables to Solve Linear Systems
3-1 Using Graphs and Tables to Solve Linear Systems

Geometry Summer Assignment 2016 The following packet contains
Geometry Summer Assignment 2016 The following packet contains

Summary of lesson - TI Education
Summary of lesson - TI Education

4-20. one equation or two?
4-20. one equation or two?

... equations below. Notice that the second equation is solved for y, but the first is not. Change the first equation into “y =” form, and then solve this system of equations. Check your solution. ...
A Proof Theory for Generic Judgments: An extended abstract
A Proof Theory for Generic Judgments: An extended abstract

... Here, Σ is a signature containing the list of all (explicitly typed) eigenvariables of the sequent. We write Σ ` t : γ to denote that t is a simply typed λ-term of type γ in which there may appear the (fixed) logical and non-logical constants as well as those eigenvariables in Σ. We shall also say t ...
Skills Packet
Skills Packet

... 22) a) If x = # of minutes of calls within US, y = # of minutes of calls within Mexico Inequality: 0.16x + 0.44y < 50. 22) b) Graph: y < – 4/11x + 113 7/11. The graph has a yintercept of (0, 113 7/11) and a slope of –4/11. The solid line passes through the points (0, 113 7/11) and (11, 109 7/11); sh ...
StewartCalc7e_17_01
StewartCalc7e_17_01

... If P, Q, R, and G are continuous on an interval and P(x)  0 there, then a theorem found in more advanced books guarantees the existence and uniqueness of a solution to this initial-value problem. Examples 5 illustrate the technique for solving such a problem. ...
Name _ Date Period 1 3 4 5 6 7 Semester 1 Exam Study Guide The
Name _ Date Period 1 3 4 5 6 7 Semester 1 Exam Study Guide The

ANT-BASED SEARCH STRATEGY FOR INDUSTRIAL MULTIPLE-FAULT DIAGNOSTICS Pasquale
ANT-BASED SEARCH STRATEGY FOR INDUSTRIAL MULTIPLE-FAULT DIAGNOSTICS Pasquale

Riccati Equations and Modified Bessel Functions
Riccati Equations and Modified Bessel Functions

... Note that this form of the solution differs from (7) in that it involves the Bessel functions Y−3/ 4 and Y1/ 4 of the second kind rather than the Bessel functions J −3/ 4 and J−1/ 4 of the first kind. In order to impose an initial condition, we must therefore evaluate the limit as x → 0 instead of u ...
3.3 PROPERTIES OF LOGARITHMS
3.3 PROPERTIES OF LOGARITHMS

... • Use the change-of-base formula to rewrite and evaluate logarithmic expressions. • Use properties of logarithms to evaluate or rewrite logarithmic expressions. • Use properties of logarithms to expand or condense logarithmic expressions. • Use logarithmic functions to model and solve ...
Computability and Complexity Results for a Spatial Assertion
Computability and Complexity Results for a Spatial Assertion

... For the decidability of checking (s, h) |= P for all states (s, h), we observe that the actual values of variables are not relevant to the truth of an assertion as long as the “relationship” of the values remains the same. We define a relation ≈X to capture this “relationship” formally. Intuitively, ...
Reformulation based MaxSAT robustness (Extended abstract)
Reformulation based MaxSAT robustness (Extended abstract)

... In this paper we have proposed a mechanism for finding robust solutions to weighted MaxSAT problems. We have extended the approach of Ginsberg et al. [4] to deal with cost constraints and don’t-care variables. By using cardinality constraints, the reformulation results in a much smaller problem in t ...
Class Worked Example
Class Worked Example

Non-Optimal Multi-Agent Pathfinding Is Solved (Since 1984)
Non-Optimal Multi-Agent Pathfinding Is Solved (Since 1984)

Solving Equations—Quick Reference - Algebra
Solving Equations—Quick Reference - Algebra

... 3. On either side, do you have like terms? Yes—Rewrite the equation with like terms together. Then combine like terms. (Don’t forget to take the sign in front of each term!) No– Go to Step 4. 4. Do you have variables on both sides of the equation? Yes—Add or subtract the terms to get all the variabl ...
section 6.1
section 6.1

< 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 33 >

Unification (computer science)

Unification, in computer science and logic, is an algorithmic process of solving equations between symbolic expressions.Depending on which expressions (also called terms) are allowed to occur in an equation set (also called unification problem), and which expressions are considered equal, several frameworks of unification are distinguished. If higher-order variables, that is, variables representing functions, are allowed in an expression, the process is called higher-order unification, otherwise first-order unification. If a solution is required to make both sides of each equation literally equal, the process is called syntactical unification, otherwise semantical, or equational unification, or E-unification, or unification modulo theory.A solution of a unification problem is denoted as a substitution, that is, a mapping assigning a symbolic value to each variable of the problem's expressions. A unification algorithm should compute for a given problem a complete, and minimal substitution set, that is, a set covering all its solutions, and containing no redundant members. Depending on the framework, a complete and minimal substitution set may have at most one, at most finitely many, or possibly infinitely many members, or may not exist at all. In some frameworks it is generally impossible to decide whether any solution exists. For first-order syntactical unification, Martelli and Montanari gave an algorithm that reports unsolvability or computes a complete and minimal singleton substitution set containing the so-called most general unifier.For example, using x,y,z as variables, the singleton equation set { cons(x,cons(x,nil)) = cons(2,y) } is a syntactic first-order unification problem that has the substitution { x ↦ 2, y ↦ cons(2,nil) } as its only solution.The syntactic first-order unification problem { y = cons(2,y) } has no solution over the set of finite terms; however, it has the single solution { y ↦ cons(2,cons(2,cons(2,...))) } over the set of infinite trees.The semantic first-order unification problem { a⋅x = x⋅a } has each substitution of the form { x ↦ a⋅...⋅a } as a solution in a semigroup, i.e. if (⋅) is considered associative; the same problem, viewed in an abelian group, where (⋅) is considered also commutative, has any substitution at all as a solution.The singleton set { a = y(x) } is a syntactic second-order unification problem, since y is a function variable.One solution is { x ↦ a, y ↦ (identity function) }; another one is { y ↦ (constant function mapping each value to a), x ↦ (any value) }.The first formal investigation of unification can be attributed to John Alan Robinson, who used first-order syntactical unification as a basic building block of his resolution procedure for first-order logic, a great step forward in automated reasoning technology, as it eliminated one source of combinatorial explosion: searching for instantiation of terms. Today, automated reasoning is still the main application area of unification.Syntactical first-order unification is used in logic programming and programming language type system implementation, especially in Hindley–Milner based type inference algorithms.Semantic unification is used in SMT solvers and term rewriting algorithms.Higher-order unification is used in proof assistants, for example Isabelle and Twelf, and restricted forms of higher-order unification (higher-order pattern unification) are used in some programming language implementations, such as lambdaProlog, as higher-order patterns are expressive, yet their associated unification procedure retains theoretical properties closer to first-order unification.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report