
6.042J Lecture 02: Solutions
... appeal to the following: Lemma 2.2. If a prime, p, is a factor of some power of an integer, then it is a factor of that integer. You may assume Lemma 2.2 without writing down its proof, but see if you can explain why it is true. Solution. Proof. Let r be a real root of the polynomial, so that a0 + a ...
... appeal to the following: Lemma 2.2. If a prime, p, is a factor of some power of an integer, then it is a factor of that integer. You may assume Lemma 2.2 without writing down its proof, but see if you can explain why it is true. Solution. Proof. Let r be a real root of the polynomial, so that a0 + a ...
Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach
... This statement, known as “Goldbach’s Conjecture”, was conjectured to be true by Christian Goldbach in 1742. In the more than 250 years that have passed since, no one has ever found a counterexample to this statement. In fact, it has been verified to be true for all even numbers from 4 till 100, 000, ...
... This statement, known as “Goldbach’s Conjecture”, was conjectured to be true by Christian Goldbach in 1742. In the more than 250 years that have passed since, no one has ever found a counterexample to this statement. In fact, it has been verified to be true for all even numbers from 4 till 100, 000, ...
Construction of Angles Multiples of the Approximate
... Elis was able to square the circle despite the following theorem. Theorem 2.5 (Lindemann). It is impossible to square the circle with ruler and compass. ...
... Elis was able to square the circle despite the following theorem. Theorem 2.5 (Lindemann). It is impossible to square the circle with ruler and compass. ...
Section 1
... Contrapositives, converses, and inverses Definition Consider the implication p q 1. The converse of the implication is 2. The inverse of the implication is 3. The contrapositive of the implication is Proposition 3 1. An implication and its contrapositive are logically equivalent 2. The converse a ...
... Contrapositives, converses, and inverses Definition Consider the implication p q 1. The converse of the implication is 2. The inverse of the implication is 3. The contrapositive of the implication is Proposition 3 1. An implication and its contrapositive are logically equivalent 2. The converse a ...
THE CHINESE REMAINDER CLOCK FIGURE 1. It is ten twenty
... These numbers repeat theirselves cyclically because adding to the dividend some multiple of n does not change the n-remainder. Also pin down for later use that the difference between a number and its n-remainder is always a multiple of n. The vertices of an n-gon can be used to describe the n-remain ...
... These numbers repeat theirselves cyclically because adding to the dividend some multiple of n does not change the n-remainder. Also pin down for later use that the difference between a number and its n-remainder is always a multiple of n. The vertices of an n-gon can be used to describe the n-remain ...
Development of New Method for Generating Prime Numbers
... daughters. Slandy always wore aтamazing beauty antique necklace of precious pearls, which according to tradition passed from mother-in-law to daughter-in-law. In old age, she told her daughters-in-law: “By inheritance it is time to pass the necklace to someone of you and if I will choose someone of ...
... daughters. Slandy always wore aтamazing beauty antique necklace of precious pearls, which according to tradition passed from mother-in-law to daughter-in-law. In old age, she told her daughters-in-law: “By inheritance it is time to pass the necklace to someone of you and if I will choose someone of ...
Betti Numbers and Parallel Deformations
... • Find the generalization of convexity that allows you to prove the second McMullen conjecture • Understand the stellated polytopes • Think of our plane pictures as rotation invariant Hasse diagrams for a poset? • Understand projective invariance ...
... • Find the generalization of convexity that allows you to prove the second McMullen conjecture • Understand the stellated polytopes • Think of our plane pictures as rotation invariant Hasse diagrams for a poset? • Understand projective invariance ...
Probability
... True, but the law of large numbers tells us that the greater the number of repetitions the closer the outcomes come to the true probability, here .5. A single event may be unpredictable but the relative frequency of these events is lawful over an infinite number of trials\repetitions. ...
... True, but the law of large numbers tells us that the greater the number of repetitions the closer the outcomes come to the true probability, here .5. A single event may be unpredictable but the relative frequency of these events is lawful over an infinite number of trials\repetitions. ...
pdf format
... and one can eliminate the use of 1 by using 1 = 20 . More formally we define: Definition Let n ∈ ω . The extended base k notation for n is inductively defined as follows. The expression 0 is the extended base k notation for n = 0. For n > 0, write n in base k notation as n = kn1 · a1 + · · · + kn` · ...
... and one can eliminate the use of 1 by using 1 = 20 . More formally we define: Definition Let n ∈ ω . The extended base k notation for n is inductively defined as follows. The expression 0 is the extended base k notation for n = 0. For n > 0, write n in base k notation as n = kn1 · a1 + · · · + kn` · ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.