• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Full text
Full text

Chapter 17 Proof by Contradiction
Chapter 17 Proof by Contradiction

Program Equilibrium in the Prisoner`s Dilemma via Löb`s Theorem
Program Equilibrium in the Prisoner`s Dilemma via Löb`s Theorem

SOME REMARKS ON SET THEORY, IX. COMBINATORIAL
SOME REMARKS ON SET THEORY, IX. COMBINATORIAL

Chapter 17 Proof by Contradiction
Chapter 17 Proof by Contradiction

Pythagorean Theorem
Pythagorean Theorem

Syllabus_Science_Mathematics_Sem-5
Syllabus_Science_Mathematics_Sem-5

Problems
Problems

Part 1: Propositional Logic
Part 1: Propositional Logic

... Obviously, A(F ) depends only on the values of those finitely many variables in F under A. If F contains n distinct propositional variables, then it is sufficient to check 2n valuations to see whether F is satisfiable or not. ⇒ truth table. So the satisfiability problem is clearly decidable (but, by ...
PDF
PDF

Cauchy Sequences
Cauchy Sequences

Approximation of irrational numbers. Let α be an irrational number
Approximation of irrational numbers. Let α be an irrational number

Resources - CSE, IIT Bombay
Resources - CSE, IIT Bombay

... Let , S  {P ( x)  Q( x), R ( f ( y ))}  Herbrand Universe H  H  {a, f (a ), f ( f (a )), }  Atom Set A is given by A  {P (a ), P ( f (a )), P ( f ( f (a ))),  , Q (a ),  , R (a ), }  Some Herbrand Interpreta tions are I 1  {P (a ), P ( f (a )), P ( f ( f (a ))),  , Q (a ),  , R (a ), ...
Essentials of Geometry - Piscataway High School
Essentials of Geometry - Piscataway High School

... mathematics. Initially, the language of Geometry is introduced so that terminology is understood and infused throughout the class. In addition, students will study the concept of congruency and similarity, properties of geometric shapes, measurement of plane and solid figures. The concept of proof w ...
Pythagorean Theorem
Pythagorean Theorem

PPSection 2.2
PPSection 2.2

Slide 1
Slide 1

Section.1.1
Section.1.1

Document
Document

... A false statement is called a contradiction. For example, “S and not S” is a contradiction for any statement S. A truth table will show us that “if A then B,” is equivalent to “A and not B implies false.” So to prove “if A then B,” it suffices to assume A and also to assume not B, and then argue tow ...
Introduction to Discrete Mathematics
Introduction to Discrete Mathematics

2 - DePaul University
2 - DePaul University

A  General  Proof  Method  for ... without  the  Barcan  Formula.*
A General Proof Method for ... without the Barcan Formula.*

Prove if n 3 is even then n is even. Proof
Prove if n 3 is even then n is even. Proof

... Lemmas and Corollaries • A lemma is a simple theorem used in the proof of other theorems. ...
Math 3:  Unit 1 – Reasoning and Proof Inductive, Deductive
Math 3: Unit 1 – Reasoning and Proof Inductive, Deductive

Lecture slides (full content)
Lecture slides (full content)

< 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 ... 170 >

Theorem



In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report