• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Algebra - University at Albany
Algebra - University at Albany

Morphisms of Algebraic Stacks
Morphisms of Algebraic Stacks

... then j is the structure morphism G → S. Hence the diagonal is not automatically separated itself (contrary to what happens in the case of schemes and algebraic spaces). To say that [S/G] is quasi-separated over S should certainly imply that G → S is quasi-compact, but we hesitate to say that [S/G] i ...
Fun with Fields by William Andrew Johnson A dissertation submitted
Fun with Fields by William Andrew Johnson A dissertation submitted

Hartshorne Ch. II, §3 First Properties of Schemes
Hartshorne Ch. II, §3 First Properties of Schemes

Abstract Algebra - UCLA Department of Mathematics
Abstract Algebra - UCLA Department of Mathematics

... multiply them by scalars. In abstract algebra, we attempt to provide lists of properties that common mathematical objects satisfy. Given such a list of properties, we impose them as “axioms”, and we study the properties of objects that satisfy these axioms. The objects that we deal with most in the ...
COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA Contents Introduction 5 0.1. What is
COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA Contents Introduction 5 0.1. What is

COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA Contents Introduction 5
COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA Contents Introduction 5

COMPLEXES OF INJECTIVE kG-MODULES 1. Introduction Let k be
COMPLEXES OF INJECTIVE kG-MODULES 1. Introduction Let k be

Commutative ideal theory without finiteness
Commutative ideal theory without finiteness

... Moreover, every nonzero fractional R-ideal has a unique representation as an irredundant intersection of infinitely many completely Q-irreducible R-submodules of Q. It follows that R has no nonzero fractional ideal that is Q-irreducible. In Section 2 we establish basic properties of irreducible subm ...
An Introduction to Algebraic Number Theory, and the Class Number
An Introduction to Algebraic Number Theory, and the Class Number

... The extension E/F is algebraic (or E is algebraic over F ) if every element of E is algebraic over F . Let E/F be a field extension, and let α ∈ E be algebraic over F . The minimal polynomial of α over F , denoted irr(α, F ), is the unique monic irreducible polynomial f ∈ F [X] such that f (α) = 0. ...
On Brauer Groups of Lubin
On Brauer Groups of Lubin

STABLE CANONICAL RULES 1. Introduction It is a well
STABLE CANONICAL RULES 1. Introduction It is a well

... let X∗ = (X ∗ , ♦), where X ∗ is the Boolean algebra of clopens of X and ♦(U ) = R−1 [U ]. For a bounded morphism f : X → Y , its dual f ∗ : Y ∗ → X ∗ is given by f −1 . Let A = (A, ♦) be a modal algebra and let X = (X, R) be its dual space. Then it is well known that R is reflexive iff a ≤ ♦a, and ...
A First Course in Abstract Algebra: Rings, Groups, and Fields
A First Course in Abstract Algebra: Rings, Groups, and Fields

A Course on Convex Geometry
A Course on Convex Geometry

CONSTRUCTING INTERNALLY 4
CONSTRUCTING INTERNALLY 4

Algebra: Monomials and Polynomials
Algebra: Monomials and Polynomials

... • Sage 3.x and later[Ste08]; • Lyx [Lyx ] (and therefore LATEX [Lam86, Grä04] (and therefore TEX [Knu84])), along with the packages ...
19 Feb 2010
19 Feb 2010

Ergodic theory lecture notes
Ergodic theory lecture notes

... However, one might expect (1.1.1) to hold for ‘typical’ points x ∈ X (where again we can make ‘typical’ precise using measure theory). One might also want to replace the function χ[a,b] with an arbitrary function f : X → R. In this case one would want to ask: for the doubling map T , when is it the ...
ON THE REPRESENTABILITY OF ACTIONS IN A SEMI
ON THE REPRESENTABILITY OF ACTIONS IN A SEMI

... exact since so is E (see [2] 5.11). It is protomodular by [8] 3.1.16. It is thus semi-abelian. One concludes by statement 3 and proposition 1.4. In this paper, we consider first a certain number of other basic examples, where the functor Act(−, X) is representable by an easily describable object. And ...
Dilation Theory, Commutant Lifting and Semicrossed Products
Dilation Theory, Commutant Lifting and Semicrossed Products

The constant term of tempered functions on a real spherical
The constant term of tempered functions on a real spherical

... Then, by changing the element f f into aZ,E f f , we define a new choice W for which the polar decomposition (1.5) is valid and its elements satisfy (1.6). The elements of the original W satisfy aw ¨ z0 “ w ¨ z0 (cf. [11, Lemma 3.5 and its proof]). As the elements of the new set W are obtained by mu ...
IDEAL FACTORIZATION 1. Introduction We will prove here the
IDEAL FACTORIZATION 1. Introduction We will prove here the

... for some nonzero primes pi . Use such a product where r is minimal. If r = 1 then p ⊃ (x) ⊃ p1 , so p = p1 since both ideals are maximal. Thus p = (x), so e p = (1/x)OK 6= OK , which is what we wanted (with y = 1). Thus we may suppose r ≥ 2. Since p ⊃ (x) ⊃ p1 · · · pr , p = pi for some i by Corolla ...
Form Methods for Evolution Equations, and Applications
Form Methods for Evolution Equations, and Applications

... (c) First we show that, given x ∈ X, the orbit T (·)x is continuous. As the restriction of T to [0, ∞) is a C0 -semigroup it follows from (b) that T (·)x is continuous on [0, ∞). Let t 6 0. Then T (t + h)x − T (t)x = T (t − 1)(T (1 + h)x − T (1)x) → 0 (h → 0), and this implies that T (·)x is continu ...
Real Algebraic Sets
Real Algebraic Sets

... map f : A → Rp is said to be semialgebraic if its graph Γ(f ) ⊂ Rn × Rp = Rn+p is semialgebraic. For instance, the polynomial maps and the regular maps (i.e. those maps whose coordinates are rational functions such√that the denominator does not vanish) are semialgebraic. The function x 7→ 1 − x2 for ...
IDEAL FACTORIZATION 1. Introduction
IDEAL FACTORIZATION 1. Introduction

... for some nonzero primes pi . Use such a product where r is minimal. If r = 1 then p ⊃ (x) ⊃ p1 , so p = p1 since both ideals are maximal. Thus p = (x), so e p = (1/x)OK 6= OK , which is what we wanted (with y = 1). Thus we may suppose r ≥ 2. Since p ⊃ (x) ⊃ p1 · · · pr , p = pi for some i by Corolla ...
1 2 3 4 5 ... 37 >

Congruence lattice problem

In mathematics, the congruence lattice problem asks whether every algebraic distributive lattice is isomorphic to the congruence lattice of some other lattice. The problem was posed by Robert P. Dilworth, and for many years it was one of the most famous and long-standing open problems in lattice theory; it had a deep impact on the development of lattice theory itself. The conjecture that every distributive lattice is a congruence lattice is true for all distributive lattices with at most ℵ1 compact elements, but F. Wehrung provided a counterexample for distributive lattices with ℵ2 compact elements using a construction based on Kuratowski's free set theorem.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report