• Study Resource
  • Explore Categories
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Behavioral conformity in games with many players
Behavioral conformity in games with many players

... with the desired properties may not exist. Example 1. Players have to choose between two locations A and B. The attribute space is given by {X, P } where a player with crowding type X is a celebrity and a player with crowding type P an ‘ordinary’ member of the public. We suppose that there is only o ...
Part 4 (Evolutional Game) - Wireless Networking, Signal Processing
Part 4 (Evolutional Game) - Wireless Networking, Signal Processing

Game Theory EconC31
Game Theory EconC31

Problem 1
Problem 1

... rather than -10)" so he is indifferent when Alice works 50%. So, is the (only) mixed-strategy equilibrium. We can also see the three equilibria by drawing the players' reaction curves. ...
Below is a topical outline of the major content areas covered by the
Below is a topical outline of the major content areas covered by the

Nash Equilibrium (existence)
Nash Equilibrium (existence)

The Myth of the Folk Theorem
The Myth of the Folk Theorem

... ±1 [CTV07]. PPAD-hardness implies that a problem is at least as hard as discrete variations on finding Brouwer fixed-point, and thus presumably computationally intractable [P94]. Repeated games, ordinary games played by the same players a large — usually infinite — number of times, are believed to b ...
Oligopoly - Rio Hondo College
Oligopoly - Rio Hondo College

A logical characterization of iterated admissibility
A logical characterization of iterated admissibility

... appropriate levels of rationality, we assume that “all the agents know” is that the other agents satisfy the appropriate rationality assumptions. We are using the phrase “all agent i knows” here in essentially the same sense that it is used by Levesque [1990] and Halpern and Lakemeyer [2001]. We for ...
economics in action
economics in action

... • The study of behavior in situations of interdependence is known as game theory. • The reward received by a player in a game—such as the profit earned by an oligopolist—is that player’s payoff. ...
Chapter 30: Game Theory
Chapter 30: Game Theory

... If you were individual 1, what would you do? You might argue that what is best for you depends in principle on what individual 2 is doing. You might then ask yourself – what is your best decision for each possible decision of individual 2? If individual 2 chooses column A then your best decision is ...
Talk - UCL Computer Science
Talk - UCL Computer Science

...  Classical game theory both players D  Shame because they’d do better by both cooperating  Cooperation is a very general problem in biology  Everyone benefits from being in cooperative group, but each can do better by exploiting cooperative efforts of others ...
Tools for Deriving Card Games from Mathematical Games
Tools for Deriving Card Games from Mathematical Games

... Dresher and Merrill Flood of the Rand corporation and given its name and interpretation as arising from a pair of prisoners by Albert Tucker in 1950. The game is used to model cooperation and conflict and, in its single-shot version, shows why rational agents might avoid cooperating. The mechanics o ...
Oligopoly
Oligopoly

... produces better results no matter what strategy other firms follow. • The interdependence of oligopolies decisions can often lead to the prisoner’s dilemma. ...
Imagine-self perspective-taking promotes Nash choices in - E-SGH
Imagine-self perspective-taking promotes Nash choices in - E-SGH

updated version for the 2015 Superbowl
updated version for the 2015 Superbowl

... Definition: A combination of strategies is a Nash (non-cooperative) equilibrium if each player’s strategy is best, given the strategies chosen by the other players. The Nash equilibrium is a “mutual best response” in the sense that each player is correctly assessing the strategies of all other playe ...
Game Theory Basics I: Strategic Form Games1
Game Theory Basics I: Strategic Form Games1

... Sontag and Drew (1998) reported that a captain of the USS Lapon used dice in order to randomize. Curiously, it is a plot point in Clancy (1984), a classic military techno-thriller, that a (fictional) top Russian submarine commander was predictable when clearing the baffles of his submarine. 2. Empi ...
Chapter 1 - University of St. Thomas
Chapter 1 - University of St. Thomas

... dominated strategy. In fact, every game has a Nash equilibrium, possibly in mixed strategies. The game of Chicken is an example of a game with no dominant or dominated strategies but which has a Nash equilibrium. 6. What is the difference between a pure strategy and a mixed strategy? A pure strategy ...
A Recurrent Neural Network for Game Theoretic Decision Making
A Recurrent Neural Network for Game Theoretic Decision Making

Some relationships between evolutionary stability
Some relationships between evolutionary stability

... 39. Given Swinkels (1992) finding that an ESS must be REE, it is easy to see that x then must be REE according to Definition 3. Definition 39 makes clear how the REE and ESS criteria are related. Both criteria imply that for x[ A to pass the respective tests, it must be a best response against itsel ...
2005 Worth Publishers, all rights reserved
2005 Worth Publishers, all rights reserved

Lecture 1
Lecture 1

... Auctions can be seen as a useful microcosm for bigger markets  “Rules of the game” and price formation are explicit, allowing for theoretical analysis ...
Note
Note

... ‘all the weight’ on the strategy si . In this context si will be called a pure strategy . Consequently we can view Si as a subset of ∆Si and S−i as a subset of ×j6=i ∆Sj . By a mixed extension of (S1 , . . . , Sn , p1 , . . . , pn ) we mean the strategic game (∆S1 , . . . , ∆Sn , p1 , . . . , pn ), ...
07.9 - Sophia Antipolis
07.9 - Sophia Antipolis

... an evolutionarily stable strategy [14]. The authors of [17] assume that somehow n foragers have reached a patch simultaneously, and they investigate the evolutionarily stable giving up strategy. Our innovation lies in the fact that an a-priori unlimited number of foragers reaching a patch at random ...
Lecture #11 - people.vcu.edu
Lecture #11 - people.vcu.edu

... C. Infinitely Repeated Games. As a second class of games, we switch from the assumption that a game is played only once, to the other extreme: Suppose that a game is repeated an infinite number of times. ...
< 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 16 >

Prisoner's dilemma

The prisoner's dilemma is a standard example of a game analyzed in game theory that shows why two completely ""rational"" individuals might not cooperate, even if it appears that it is in their best interests to do so. It was originally framed by Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher working at RAND in 1950. Albert W. Tucker formalized the game with prison sentence rewards and named it, ""prisoner's dilemma"" (Poundstone, 1992), presenting it as follows:Two members of a criminal gang are arrested and imprisoned. Each prisoner is in solitary confinement with no means of communicating with the other. The prosecutors lack sufficient evidence to convict the pair on the principal charge. They hope to get both sentenced to a year in prison on a lesser charge. Simultaneously, the prosecutors offer each prisoner a bargain. Each prisoner is given the opportunity either to: betray the other by testifying that the other committed the crime, or to cooperate with the other by remaining silent. The offer is: If A and B each betray the other, each of them serves 2 years in prison If A betrays B but B remains silent, A will be set free and B will serve 3 years in prison (and vice versa) If A and B both remain silent, both of them will only serve 1 year in prison (on the lesser charge)It is implied that the prisoners will have no opportunity to reward or punish their partner other than the prison sentences they get, and that their decision will not affect their reputation in the future. Because betraying a partner offers a greater reward than cooperating with him, all purely rational self-interested prisoners would betray the other, and so the only possible outcome for two purely rational prisoners is for them to betray each other. The interesting part of this result is that pursuing individual reward logically leads both of the prisoners to betray, when they would get a better reward if they both kept silent. In reality, humans display a systematic bias towards cooperative behavior in this and similar games, much more so than predicted by simple models of ""rational"" self-interested action. A model based on a different kind of rationality, where people forecast how the game would be played if they formed coalitions and then they maximize their forecasts, has been shown to make better predictions of the rate of cooperation in this and similar games given only the payoffs of the game.An extended ""iterated"" version of the game also exists, where the classic game is played repeatedly between the same prisoners, and consequently, both prisoners continuously have an opportunity to penalize the other for previous decisions. If the number of times the game will be played is known to the players, then (by backward induction) two classically rational players will betray each other repeatedly, for the same reasons as the single shot variant. In an infinite or unknown length game there is no fixed optimum strategy, and Prisoner's Dilemma tournaments have been held to compete and test algorithms.The prisoner's dilemma game can be used as a model for many real world situations involving cooperative behaviour. In casual usage, the label ""prisoner's dilemma"" may be applied to situations not strictly matching the formal criteria of the classic or iterative games: for instance, those in which two entities could gain important benefits from cooperating or suffer from the failure to do so, but find it merely difficult or expensive, not necessarily impossible, to coordinate their activities to achieve cooperation.
  • studyres.com © 2026
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report