• Study Resource
  • Explore Categories
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
(Bemisia tabaci) INFESTING BRINJAL PLANTS
(Bemisia tabaci) INFESTING BRINJAL PLANTS

... (Reading of Matrices and Nash Equilibrium) The following examples explained below are examples provided by (Varian, 1980) on Game Theory, which are among the most common that have been used over time to explain the best strategic decisions between companies. According to (Varian, 1980) agents can ad ...
Lecture notes - MIT OpenCourseWare
Lecture notes - MIT OpenCourseWare

... Both dominant-strategy equilibrium and rationalizability are well-founded solution concepts. If players are rational and they are cautious in the sense that they assign positive probability to each of the other players’ strategies, then we would expect that the players to play according to the domin ...
Deliberation as Coordination through Cheap Talk ∗ Randall Calvert Washington University, St. Louis
Deliberation as Coordination through Cheap Talk ∗ Randall Calvert Washington University, St. Louis

... Applying similar reasoning to a problem of reaching political agreement among a large number of participants requires that we address several new complications. First, a large number of players might have an equally large variety of preferences concerning what outcomes are most desirable, so a suita ...
Rationalizing Focal Points
Rationalizing Focal Points

Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Game using Correlated
Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Game using Correlated

Selecting an Advertising Strategy
Selecting an Advertising Strategy

... advertising strategy, Shared Services Recruitment can provide further advice relating to the scope of advertising services available. Advertising with an Attraction and Retention Incentive (ARIn) Amount Before advertising any vacancy, the substantive classification of the role must have been assesse ...
A Simplicial Algorithm Approach to Nash Equilibria in Concave Games
A Simplicial Algorithm Approach to Nash Equilibria in Concave Games

... with compact, convex strategy sets and continuous, quasi-concave payoffs can be proved by using the Brouwer fixed point theorem. In a recent paper, Geanakoplos (2003) proves the existence of Nash equilibria using the Brouwer theorem by introducing a “satisficing improvement function”, which replaces ...
Economic game theory for mutualism and cooperation
Economic game theory for mutualism and cooperation

... about his own quality (implemented in the game by allowing him to move first), which the second mover (e.g. the female) evaluates to decide whether or not to accept the first mover. In screening, instead, the first mover is the player that wants to discover the hidden characteristics (the Ôprincipal ...
Satisfaction Equilibrium Learning
Satisfaction Equilibrium Learning

... satisfaction states and thresholds for each action to bound the value of the satisfaction threshold Canadian AI 2006 ...
The Nash Equilibrium in Multy
The Nash Equilibrium in Multy

Algorithms for Playing Games with Limited Randomness
Algorithms for Playing Games with Limited Randomness

... Definition 2.1 For a finite strategy P set S we define ∆(S) to be the set of probability distributions over S, i.e, all vectors p = (ps )s∈S satisfying s∈S ps = 1 with each ps ∈ [0, 1]. A mixed strategy p is an element of ∆(S). The support of a mixed strategy p ∈ ∆(S) is the set supp(p) given by sup ...
pdf,162KB - Iowa State University Department of Economics
pdf,162KB - Iowa State University Department of Economics

... player starts repeatedly playing Up, and again assuming the column player is awake, he may instead start responding by playing Right, and the two players will end up with a repeated (Up, Right) play. The lesson from this is simple yet profound: In a multi-agent setting one cannot separate learning f ...
Boundedly Rational Nash Equilibrium: A
Boundedly Rational Nash Equilibrium: A

... interpretation. Indeed, the noise and random utility interpretations are very close in the sense that, in both cases, the decision maker has some randomly drawn evaluations with respect to which she optimizes. The bounded rationality interpretation takes a fundamentally different view of the choice ...
Rationality authority for provable rational behavior
Rationality authority for provable rational behavior

... correlated equilibria [1] or as moderators that are used in multi-party computation [15]. However, the rationality authority is not trusted, where as synchronization mechanisms are. Vis., the inventors must demonstrate their trustworthiness and have only the (trusted) verifiers at their disposal. Thi ...
Alger Weibull 2016
Alger Weibull 2016

... is that each player’s strategy set be a compact and convex set in some normed vector space. We define a goal function to be evolutionarily stable against another goal function if, in every (Bayesian) Nash equilibrium in every population state where the latter goal function is sufficiently rare, individ ...
PDF
PDF

... identifying the equilibrium by method of triangulation. Much of the later research, such as the papers by van der Laan and Talman [28, 29, 30] and Doup and Talman [4, 5] have concentrated on making improvements on these Scarf algorithm. In terms of algorithms that can be used specifically for comput ...
Optimization of an Evaluation Function of the 4
Optimization of an Evaluation Function of the 4

... In the following rounds, the player who “hit” (used up all their “stones” (tile pieces) before the other players) in the previous round will start with the double of his choice. The main objective of 4-sided dominoes is to achieve a score of 200 or more points, in one or more rounds of play. During ...
On Oblivious PTAS`s for Nash Equilibrium
On Oblivious PTAS`s for Nash Equilibrium

after Nash eqm, Subgame Perfect Nash eqm, and Bayesi
after Nash eqm, Subgame Perfect Nash eqm, and Bayesi

... Bayesian Nash Equilibrium was discovered in 1967 by John Harsanyi. Information Sets in the Extensive Form Definition 1. An information set is a set of decision nodes, all belonging to the same player, over which that player cannot distinguish. Consider this version of the Battle of the Sexes game: • ...
NauVTslides - Duke University`s Fuqua School of Business
NauVTslides - Duke University`s Fuqua School of Business

... • The contents of G (rather than in ) suffice to determine all the noncooperative equilibria of the game. • Definition: a correlated equilibrium of the game is a distribution  that satisfies G  0, i.e., that assigns non-negative expected value to each of the rows of G – If used by a mediator to g ...
Output Agreement Mechanisms and Common Knowledge
Output Agreement Mechanisms and Common Knowledge

... With this, we show that output agreement games elicit common knowledge: There is a strict equilibrium where players report the correct answer according to the common knowledge they possess; and this holds for any query we ask and any information structure agents have. We note that most prior mechani ...
Ch3
Ch3

... Scarecrow plays N, or (2) b if Scarecrow plays N. (b) Scarecrow has two actions at three different nodes, so Scarecrow has eight strategies, 2•2•2=8. To describe the strategies accurately, we must specify a player’s action at each decision node. Scarecrow decides at nodes 1, 3, and 5, so we will lab ...
1 Chapter 16: Oligopoly MARKETS WITH ONLY A FEW SELLERS
1 Chapter 16: Oligopoly MARKETS WITH ONLY A FEW SELLERS

... • Strategic decisions are those in which each person, in deciding what actions to take, must consider how others might respond to that action. • Because the number of firms in an oligopolistic market is small, each firm must act strategically. • Each firm knows that its profit depends not only on ho ...
Chapter 6 Games - Cornell Computer Science
Chapter 6 Games - Cornell Computer Science

... doing it jointly with a partner. If both you and your partner prepare for the presentation, then the presentation will go extremely well, and your expected joint grade is a 100. If just one of you prepares (and the other doesn’t), you’ll get an expected joint grade of 92; and if neither of you prepa ...
Kanniainen 01 ee08  6538261 en
Kanniainen 01 ee08 6538261 en

... in Helsinki. The plan of the …rm producing the British condiment HP sauce to move production to the Netherlands caused a consumer boycott. A person who joins a consumer boycott is typically willing to pay a higher price for a good produced by a …rm not boycotted. Moreover, those organizing the boyco ...
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16 >

Prisoner's dilemma

The prisoner's dilemma is a standard example of a game analyzed in game theory that shows why two completely ""rational"" individuals might not cooperate, even if it appears that it is in their best interests to do so. It was originally framed by Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher working at RAND in 1950. Albert W. Tucker formalized the game with prison sentence rewards and named it, ""prisoner's dilemma"" (Poundstone, 1992), presenting it as follows:Two members of a criminal gang are arrested and imprisoned. Each prisoner is in solitary confinement with no means of communicating with the other. The prosecutors lack sufficient evidence to convict the pair on the principal charge. They hope to get both sentenced to a year in prison on a lesser charge. Simultaneously, the prosecutors offer each prisoner a bargain. Each prisoner is given the opportunity either to: betray the other by testifying that the other committed the crime, or to cooperate with the other by remaining silent. The offer is: If A and B each betray the other, each of them serves 2 years in prison If A betrays B but B remains silent, A will be set free and B will serve 3 years in prison (and vice versa) If A and B both remain silent, both of them will only serve 1 year in prison (on the lesser charge)It is implied that the prisoners will have no opportunity to reward or punish their partner other than the prison sentences they get, and that their decision will not affect their reputation in the future. Because betraying a partner offers a greater reward than cooperating with him, all purely rational self-interested prisoners would betray the other, and so the only possible outcome for two purely rational prisoners is for them to betray each other. The interesting part of this result is that pursuing individual reward logically leads both of the prisoners to betray, when they would get a better reward if they both kept silent. In reality, humans display a systematic bias towards cooperative behavior in this and similar games, much more so than predicted by simple models of ""rational"" self-interested action. A model based on a different kind of rationality, where people forecast how the game would be played if they formed coalitions and then they maximize their forecasts, has been shown to make better predictions of the rate of cooperation in this and similar games given only the payoffs of the game.An extended ""iterated"" version of the game also exists, where the classic game is played repeatedly between the same prisoners, and consequently, both prisoners continuously have an opportunity to penalize the other for previous decisions. If the number of times the game will be played is known to the players, then (by backward induction) two classically rational players will betray each other repeatedly, for the same reasons as the single shot variant. In an infinite or unknown length game there is no fixed optimum strategy, and Prisoner's Dilemma tournaments have been held to compete and test algorithms.The prisoner's dilemma game can be used as a model for many real world situations involving cooperative behaviour. In casual usage, the label ""prisoner's dilemma"" may be applied to situations not strictly matching the formal criteria of the classic or iterative games: for instance, those in which two entities could gain important benefits from cooperating or suffer from the failure to do so, but find it merely difficult or expensive, not necessarily impossible, to coordinate their activities to achieve cooperation.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report