
Implementing P3P Using Database Technology Rakesh Agrawal
... – The preference checking at the server leads to lean clients (mobile device) – An upgrade in P3P specification only require an upgrade in all the servers – As new privacy-sensitive applications emerge, they will reuse checking done at the server – Site owner can refine their policies, when they kno ...
... – The preference checking at the server leads to lean clients (mobile device) – An upgrade in P3P specification only require an upgrade in all the servers – As new privacy-sensitive applications emerge, they will reuse checking done at the server – Site owner can refine their policies, when they kno ...
Lecture 19 - The University of Texas at Dallas
... Many biometric technologies are offensive to certain individuals ...
... Many biometric technologies are offensive to certain individuals ...
Rights claims and obligations
... Retraction is movement back You may remove your personal identifying information from our records. If you have submitted personal identifying information to Eckerd, and you wish to have it removed from our records, please tell us by sending an e-mail to us at the following address:… ...
... Retraction is movement back You may remove your personal identifying information from our records. If you have submitted personal identifying information to Eckerd, and you wish to have it removed from our records, please tell us by sending an e-mail to us at the following address:… ...
OWASP Top 10 Privacy Risks
... advertising, etc.), which ones and what personal data is transferred? • Is third party tracking disclosed (which third parties and what data)? • Are third parties rated and checked regarding privacy? • Is privacy and handling of personal data part of the contract and if yes, what restrictions are in ...
... advertising, etc.), which ones and what personal data is transferred? • Is third party tracking disclosed (which third parties and what data)? • Are third parties rated and checked regarding privacy? • Is privacy and handling of personal data part of the contract and if yes, what restrictions are in ...
Web Site Privacy: How Much Should We Worry?
... The easiest way to access data Information on the Net is transmitted through many computer systems Web Sites collect personal data from their customers As Internet technology develops, there are new challenges in protecting privacy ...
... The easiest way to access data Information on the Net is transmitted through many computer systems Web Sites collect personal data from their customers As Internet technology develops, there are new challenges in protecting privacy ...
Privacy
... • Society has reached a point where it is dependent on computers. Computers are found everywhere and are important in business and in our personal lives. An individual responsibility is to understand the use of computers so that we can better direct their application for society’s benefit Bordoloi ...
... • Society has reached a point where it is dependent on computers. Computers are found everywhere and are important in business and in our personal lives. An individual responsibility is to understand the use of computers so that we can better direct their application for society’s benefit Bordoloi ...
Slides Group 1 - Department of Information Technology
... Questions what is morally problematic and what is not ...
... Questions what is morally problematic and what is not ...
Lost or Stolen Laptop Policy
... Consider using Internet accessible “cloud storage” for transporting sensitive documents on your trip. Store no sensitive documents on the laptop at any time while traveling, until they’re needed. Download them, edit and use them, then erase them when unneeded. Disable file and printer sharing in y ...
... Consider using Internet accessible “cloud storage” for transporting sensitive documents on your trip. Store no sensitive documents on the laptop at any time while traveling, until they’re needed. Download them, edit and use them, then erase them when unneeded. Disable file and printer sharing in y ...
Robbins v. Lower Merion School District

Robbins v. Lower Merion School District is a federal class action lawsuit, brought in February 2010 on behalf of students of two high schools in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania suburbs. In October 2010, the school district agreed to pay $610,000 to settle the Robbins and parallel Hasan lawsuits against it.The suit alleged that, in what was dubbed the ""WebcamGate"" scandal, the schools secretly spied on the students while they were in the privacy of their homes. School authorities surreptitiously and remotely activated webcams embedded in school-issued laptops the students were using at home. After the suit was brought, the school district, of which the two high schools are part, revealed that it had secretly snapped more than 66,000 images. The suit charged that in doing so the district infringed on its students' privacy rights. A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction, ordering the school district to stop its secret webcam monitoring, and ordered the district to pay the plaintiffs' attorney fees.The lawsuit was filed after 15-year-old high school sophomore (second year student) Blake Robbins was disciplined at school, for his behavior in his home. The school based its decision to discipline Robbins on a photograph that had been secretly taken of him in his bedroom, via the webcam in his school-issued laptop. Without telling its students, the schools remotely accessed their school-issued laptops to secretly snap pictures of students in their own homes, their chat logs, and records of the websites they visited. The school then transmitted the snapshots to servers at the school, where school authorities reviewed them and shared the snapshots with others. In one widely published photo, the school had photographed Robbins in his bed. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), U.S. Attorney's Office, and Montgomery County District Attorney all initiated criminal investigations of the matter, which they combined and then closed because they did not find evidence ""that would establish beyond a reasonable doubt that anyone involved had criminal intent"". In addition, a U.S. Senate Judiciary subcommittee held hearings on the issues raised by the schools' secret surveillance, and Senator Arlen Specter introduced draft legislation in the Senate to protect against it in the future. Parents, media, and academics criticized the schools, and the matter was cited as a cautionary example of how modern technology can be used to infringe on personal privacy.In July 2010, another student, Jalil Hasan, filed a parallel second suit. It related to 1,000+ images that the school snapped surreptitiously via his computer over a two-month period, including shots of him in his bedroom. The district had deactivated its surveillance of the student in February 2010, after the Robbins lawsuit was filed. Five months later—pursuant to a court order in the Robbins case—it informed Hasan for the first time that it had secretly taken the photographs. The district was put on notice of a third parallel suit that a third student intended to bring against the district, for ""improper surveillance of the Lower Merion High School student on his school issued laptop"", which included taking over 700 webcam shots and screenshots between December 2009 and February 2010.