Download
... where S, I, R are, respectively, the number of susceptibles, infectives and recovered (with immunity) and γ, δ are recovery rates with and without immunity. For many diseases the rates of infection and recovery significantly vary with age. Thus the vital dynamics of the population and the infection m ...
... where S, I, R are, respectively, the number of susceptibles, infectives and recovered (with immunity) and γ, δ are recovery rates with and without immunity. For many diseases the rates of infection and recovery significantly vary with age. Thus the vital dynamics of the population and the infection m ...
I-CONTINUITY IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES Martin Sleziak
... Sierpiński space S. Corollary 3.6. Let S be the system of all (admissible) ideals in N. Then a topological space X is countable generated if and only if X is S-sequential, i.e. for every topological space Y and every map f : X → Y the following holds: f is continuous ⇔ f is I-continuous for each (a ...
... Sierpiński space S. Corollary 3.6. Let S be the system of all (admissible) ideals in N. Then a topological space X is countable generated if and only if X is S-sequential, i.e. for every topological space Y and every map f : X → Y the following holds: f is continuous ⇔ f is I-continuous for each (a ...
51-60
... contained on A. Since d is continuous and d(x, z) > 0 for all x ∈ A, the function f : A → R defined by f (x) = 1/d(x, z) is continuous. To show that A is not compact, it suffices to show that f is unbounded. Let M ∈ R be any positive number. Since z is a limit point of A, there exists a point x ∈ A ...
... contained on A. Since d is continuous and d(x, z) > 0 for all x ∈ A, the function f : A → R defined by f (x) = 1/d(x, z) is continuous. To show that A is not compact, it suffices to show that f is unbounded. Let M ∈ R be any positive number. Since z is a limit point of A, there exists a point x ∈ A ...
Overpseudoprimes, and Mersenne and Fermat Numbers as
... is an overpseudoprime to base b. The last theorem leads us to the next definition. Definition 21. A positive integer is called primover to base b if it is either prime or an overpseudoprime to base b. By Theorem 12, we know that each divisor greater than 1, of a overpseudoprime to base b is primover ...
... is an overpseudoprime to base b. The last theorem leads us to the next definition. Definition 21. A positive integer is called primover to base b if it is either prime or an overpseudoprime to base b. By Theorem 12, we know that each divisor greater than 1, of a overpseudoprime to base b is primover ...
On the limiting spectral distribution for a large class of symmetric
... attention in the last two decades. The starting point is deep results for symmetric matrices with correlated Gaussian entries by Khorunzhy and Pastur [13], Boutet de Monvel et al [6], Boutet de Monvel and Khorunzhy [5], Chakrabarty et al [7] among others. On the other hand there is a sustained effor ...
... attention in the last two decades. The starting point is deep results for symmetric matrices with correlated Gaussian entries by Khorunzhy and Pastur [13], Boutet de Monvel et al [6], Boutet de Monvel and Khorunzhy [5], Chakrabarty et al [7] among others. On the other hand there is a sustained effor ...
Document
... G.CO.10 Prove theorems about triangles. G.CO.12 Make formal geometric constructions with a variety of tools and methods (compass and straightedge, string, reflective devices, paper folding, dynamic geometric software, etc.). Mathematical Practices ...
... G.CO.10 Prove theorems about triangles. G.CO.12 Make formal geometric constructions with a variety of tools and methods (compass and straightedge, string, reflective devices, paper folding, dynamic geometric software, etc.). Mathematical Practices ...
from mapping class groups to automorphism groups of free groups
... and g on (X × 0) × I and (X × 1) × I. Hence h∂ is a homotopy from the restriction H∂ of H to (∂X × I)∪(X × {0, 1}) to the map i∂ X ∪f ∪g : (∂X × I)∪(X × {0, 1}) → X. Now (X × I, (∂X × I) ∪ (X × {0, 1})) has the homotopy extension property as it is a CW-pair, so we get a homotopy h : (X × I) × I → X ...
... and g on (X × 0) × I and (X × 1) × I. Hence h∂ is a homotopy from the restriction H∂ of H to (∂X × I)∪(X × {0, 1}) to the map i∂ X ∪f ∪g : (∂X × I)∪(X × {0, 1}) → X. Now (X × I, (∂X × I) ∪ (X × {0, 1})) has the homotopy extension property as it is a CW-pair, so we get a homotopy h : (X × I) × I → X ...
Brouwer fixed-point theorem
Brouwer's fixed-point theorem is a fixed-point theorem in topology, named after Luitzen Brouwer. It states that for any continuous function f mapping a compact convex set into itself there is a point x0 such that f(x0) = x0. The simplest forms of Brouwer's theorem are for continuous functions f from a closed interval I in the real numbers to itself or from a closed disk D to itself. A more general form than the latter is for continuous functions from a convex compact subset K of Euclidean space to itself.Among hundreds of fixed-point theorems, Brouwer's is particularly well known, due in part to its use across numerous fields of mathematics.In its original field, this result is one of the key theorems characterizing the topology of Euclidean spaces, along with the Jordan curve theorem, the hairy ball theorem and the Borsuk–Ulam theorem.This gives it a place among the fundamental theorems of topology. The theorem is also used for proving deep results about differential equations and is covered in most introductory courses on differential geometry.It appears in unlikely fields such as game theory. In economics, Brouwer's fixed-point theorem and its extension, the Kakutani fixed-point theorem, play a central role in the proof of existence of general equilibrium in market economies as developed in the 1950s by economics Nobel prize winners Kenneth Arrow and Gérard Debreu.The theorem was first studied in view of work on differential equations by the French mathematicians around Poincaré and Picard.Proving results such as the Poincaré–Bendixson theorem requires the use of topological methods.This work at the end of the 19th century opened into several successive versions of the theorem. The general case was first proved in 1910 by Jacques Hadamard and by Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer.