• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
On Cantor`s First Uncountability Proof, Pick`s Theorem
On Cantor`s First Uncountability Proof, Pick`s Theorem

METRIC TOPOLOGY: A FIRST COURSE
METRIC TOPOLOGY: A FIRST COURSE

Notes on Π classes for Math 661 Fall 2002 Notre Dame University 1
Notes on Π classes for Math 661 Fall 2002 Notre Dame University 1

... Proof. Assume that there is such a finite set A = {a0 , . . . , an }. We claim that the singleton {ai } ∈ F for some i. If not, then since F is an ultrafilter, the set Xi = X \ {ai } is in F for each i. But, the finite intersection of the Xi and A is ∅ and must be in F . Therefore, F is not proper ...
Computability on the Real Numbers
Computability on the Real Numbers

Repovš D.: Topology and Chaos
Repovš D.: Topology and Chaos

Relationships in Triangles
Relationships in Triangles

Fuzzy Topological Spaces and Fuzzy Multifunctions
Fuzzy Topological Spaces and Fuzzy Multifunctions

real-analysis-richard-bass-3rd-edition
real-analysis-richard-bass-3rd-edition

A Note on Free Topological Groupoids
A Note on Free Topological Groupoids

Maximal Tychonoff Spaces and Normal Isolator Covers
Maximal Tychonoff Spaces and Normal Isolator Covers

computational topology
computational topology

PREFACE The marriage of algebra and topology has produced
PREFACE The marriage of algebra and topology has produced

Lecture Notes on General Topology
Lecture Notes on General Topology

Aalborg Universitet Dicoverings as quotients Fajstrup, Lisbeth
Aalborg Universitet Dicoverings as quotients Fajstrup, Lisbeth

... lift uniquely, given an initial point y0 ∈ p−1 (x0 ). There is a fiber preserving map Φ : X̃x0 → Y , along which all dipaths and dihomotopies initiating in y0 lift, but it is not necessarily continuous. Hence, the connection between the universal dicovering space wrt. x0 and other dicoverings wrt. x ...
Paracompactness with respect to an ideal
Paracompactness with respect to an ideal

Convergence in distribution in submetric spaces
Convergence in distribution in submetric spaces

first four chapters - Jesse Johnson`s Website
first four chapters - Jesse Johnson`s Website

Triangle Relationships
Triangle Relationships

Groupoid Quantales: a non étale setting
Groupoid Quantales: a non étale setting

Simultaneous Approximation and Algebraic Independence
Simultaneous Approximation and Algebraic Independence

A Comparison of Lindelöf-type Covering Properties of Topological
A Comparison of Lindelöf-type Covering Properties of Topological

HS Geometry West Campus Pacing Topic 4 2016-17
HS Geometry West Campus Pacing Topic 4 2016-17

SPACES WHOSE PSEUDOCOMPACT SUBSPACES ARE CLOSED
SPACES WHOSE PSEUDOCOMPACT SUBSPACES ARE CLOSED

On integers n for which X n – 1 has divisors of every degree
On integers n for which X n – 1 has divisors of every degree

Chapter 0: Prologue
Chapter 0: Prologue

< 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 211 >

Brouwer fixed-point theorem



Brouwer's fixed-point theorem is a fixed-point theorem in topology, named after Luitzen Brouwer. It states that for any continuous function f mapping a compact convex set into itself there is a point x0 such that f(x0) = x0. The simplest forms of Brouwer's theorem are for continuous functions f from a closed interval I in the real numbers to itself or from a closed disk D to itself. A more general form than the latter is for continuous functions from a convex compact subset K of Euclidean space to itself.Among hundreds of fixed-point theorems, Brouwer's is particularly well known, due in part to its use across numerous fields of mathematics.In its original field, this result is one of the key theorems characterizing the topology of Euclidean spaces, along with the Jordan curve theorem, the hairy ball theorem and the Borsuk–Ulam theorem.This gives it a place among the fundamental theorems of topology. The theorem is also used for proving deep results about differential equations and is covered in most introductory courses on differential geometry.It appears in unlikely fields such as game theory. In economics, Brouwer's fixed-point theorem and its extension, the Kakutani fixed-point theorem, play a central role in the proof of existence of general equilibrium in market economies as developed in the 1950s by economics Nobel prize winners Kenneth Arrow and Gérard Debreu.The theorem was first studied in view of work on differential equations by the French mathematicians around Poincaré and Picard.Proving results such as the Poincaré–Bendixson theorem requires the use of topological methods.This work at the end of the 19th century opened into several successive versions of the theorem. The general case was first proved in 1910 by Jacques Hadamard and by Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report