
2. Homeomorphisms and homotopy equivalent spaces. (14 October
... Problem 6. Prove that the spaces S 1 ∨ I and S 1 are homotopy equivalent. Problem 7. a) Prove that if the image of a map f : X → S 1 is not the whole space S 1 (i.e., the map is not onto) then f is homotopic to a constant map. b) Prove that if a map f : X → S n is not onto then f is homotopic to a c ...
... Problem 6. Prove that the spaces S 1 ∨ I and S 1 are homotopy equivalent. Problem 7. a) Prove that if the image of a map f : X → S 1 is not the whole space S 1 (i.e., the map is not onto) then f is homotopic to a constant map. b) Prove that if a map f : X → S n is not onto then f is homotopic to a c ...
Grade/Course: Geometry (First Semester) Instructional Unit 3
... (BA/PASS 2.2b) Prove theorems about -Prove theorems about lines and lines and angles. Theorems include: angles using deductive reasoning vertical angles are congruent; when a (such as the law of syllogism). transversal crosses parallel lines, -Prove a theorem stating vertical alternate interior angl ...
... (BA/PASS 2.2b) Prove theorems about -Prove theorems about lines and lines and angles. Theorems include: angles using deductive reasoning vertical angles are congruent; when a (such as the law of syllogism). transversal crosses parallel lines, -Prove a theorem stating vertical alternate interior angl ...
Parallels and Euclidean Geometry Lines l and m which are coplanar
... Theorem If two coplanar lines are cut by a transversal so that some pair of alternate interior angles are congruent, then the two lines are parallel. // Proposition i.29 is the converse of this theorem, but it is not a theorem of absolute geometry: to prove it, Euclid made use of a new axiom, his l ...
... Theorem If two coplanar lines are cut by a transversal so that some pair of alternate interior angles are congruent, then the two lines are parallel. // Proposition i.29 is the converse of this theorem, but it is not a theorem of absolute geometry: to prove it, Euclid made use of a new axiom, his l ...
Optimal Investment with Derivative Securities
... derivatives position λ∗ = λ∗ (p) together with a dynamic trading strategy θλ , maximizing the expected utility above. See Theorem 3.1 for a precise statement. As in much previous work on optimal investment strategies, we make essential use of convex duality in the proof of the main result; in partic ...
... derivatives position λ∗ = λ∗ (p) together with a dynamic trading strategy θλ , maximizing the expected utility above. See Theorem 3.1 for a precise statement. As in much previous work on optimal investment strategies, we make essential use of convex duality in the proof of the main result; in partic ...
On Exhaustion of Domains - Department of Mathematics, Statistics
... note we answer the question above in the affirmative. In fact we will prove a stronger statement: Theorem 1.3. Let D be a domain in C n contained in a ball U (of finite radius) such that ∂D touches ∂U at a point p and ∂D is C 2 in a neighborhood of p. Then D can exhaust the unit ball in C n . Remark. A ...
... note we answer the question above in the affirmative. In fact we will prove a stronger statement: Theorem 1.3. Let D be a domain in C n contained in a ball U (of finite radius) such that ∂D touches ∂U at a point p and ∂D is C 2 in a neighborhood of p. Then D can exhaust the unit ball in C n . Remark. A ...
Theorems List - bonitz-geo
... If two angles and a non-included side of one triangle are congruent to two angles and the corresponding non-included side of another triangle then the triangles are congruent Theorem 4-3 (Isosceles Triangle Theorem) If two sides of a triangle are congruent then the angles opposite those sides are co ...
... If two angles and a non-included side of one triangle are congruent to two angles and the corresponding non-included side of another triangle then the triangles are congruent Theorem 4-3 (Isosceles Triangle Theorem) If two sides of a triangle are congruent then the angles opposite those sides are co ...
The Ramanujan-Nagell Theorem: Understanding the Proof 1
... The reader may be interested to know that such fields are called quadratic fields if they are a degree 2 extension over Q. In the case where d is positive, such fields are known as real fields, ...
... The reader may be interested to know that such fields are called quadratic fields if they are a degree 2 extension over Q. In the case where d is positive, such fields are known as real fields, ...
Brouwer fixed-point theorem

Brouwer's fixed-point theorem is a fixed-point theorem in topology, named after Luitzen Brouwer. It states that for any continuous function f mapping a compact convex set into itself there is a point x0 such that f(x0) = x0. The simplest forms of Brouwer's theorem are for continuous functions f from a closed interval I in the real numbers to itself or from a closed disk D to itself. A more general form than the latter is for continuous functions from a convex compact subset K of Euclidean space to itself.Among hundreds of fixed-point theorems, Brouwer's is particularly well known, due in part to its use across numerous fields of mathematics.In its original field, this result is one of the key theorems characterizing the topology of Euclidean spaces, along with the Jordan curve theorem, the hairy ball theorem and the Borsuk–Ulam theorem.This gives it a place among the fundamental theorems of topology. The theorem is also used for proving deep results about differential equations and is covered in most introductory courses on differential geometry.It appears in unlikely fields such as game theory. In economics, Brouwer's fixed-point theorem and its extension, the Kakutani fixed-point theorem, play a central role in the proof of existence of general equilibrium in market economies as developed in the 1950s by economics Nobel prize winners Kenneth Arrow and Gérard Debreu.The theorem was first studied in view of work on differential equations by the French mathematicians around Poincaré and Picard.Proving results such as the Poincaré–Bendixson theorem requires the use of topological methods.This work at the end of the 19th century opened into several successive versions of the theorem. The general case was first proved in 1910 by Jacques Hadamard and by Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer.