Download Community Reinvestment - Vancouver Island Real Estate Board

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Capital gains tax in Australia wikipedia , lookup

Private money investing wikipedia , lookup

Negative gearing wikipedia , lookup

Internal Revenue Code section 1031 wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Our Work with CREA: Community Reinvestment
Capital Cost Allowance
Using Capital Cost Allowance (CCA), income property owners can write off a fixed percentage of the original
cost of a building and its component parts each tax year, typically up to four per cent of the un-depreciated
balance can be claimed against net rental income each year.
The Issue
However, under the current system each property is treated separately for CCA purposes. When an owner
sells a property, she's required to pay taxes on the CCA previously claimed. This often leaves an owner with
insufficient funds to acquire another property of similar value. Consequently, many owners hold on to
properties rather than sell and reinvest.
By limiting reinvestment in new properties, the current system also limits reinvestment in communities. For
example, Altus Group found a typical multi-unit income property transaction in Toronto, Vancouver or Calgary
generates $287,850 in spin-off spending. This includes renovations, repairs, professional fees, and revenue for
all levels of government.
CREA's Proposal to Increase Community Reinvestment
CREA wants to encourage reinvestment in our communities. To this end, we’re recommending that property
owners be able to defer the recapture of CCA. Specifically, for CCA purposes all of an owner’s properties
would be pooled: buying a property increases the total amount that can be depreciated; selling reduces the
amount.
The end result is that fewer owners would hold on to properties to avoid CCA recapture; they’d instead have a
strong incentive to sell and then reinvest in other properties.
The Benefits of Our Proposal
1. Community revitalization
Investment in property triggers renovations, retrofits and redevelopment because owners want to improve
their property to attract new tenants and reduce operating costs. The economy, environment and community
all benefit.
2. Leveled playing field
Over half of those who would benefit from our proposal have incomes below $50,000. Real estate developers
get tax advantages unavailable to small real estate investors. This proposal helps level the playing field
between large and small real estate investors.
3. Economic acceleration
Industries still recovering from the global economic recession would be able to create jobs and generate
economic growth. As mentioned previously, Altus Group found a typical multi-unit income property
transaction in Toronto, Vancouver or Calgary generates $287,850 in spin off spending. Its research also
estimates every two transactions create more than one job.
4. Fiscally prudent
The cost of the proposal would be offset by higher revenue from other sources. By encouraging property sales
and reinvestments, the proposal would generate more revenue from Capital Gains Tax, GST/HST and income
tax from spin-off activity.