Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Livonian Crusade wikipedia , lookup
Rhineland massacres wikipedia , lookup
Albigensian Crusade wikipedia , lookup
Despenser's Crusade wikipedia , lookup
Northern Crusades wikipedia , lookup
Siege of Antioch wikipedia , lookup
Savoyard crusade wikipedia , lookup
Battle of Nicopolis wikipedia , lookup
Barons' Crusade wikipedia , lookup
Second Crusade wikipedia , lookup
Military history of the Crusader states wikipedia , lookup
Alexius I Comnenus The Byzantine Emperor Alexius I Comnenus (b.1048-d.1118) was the most influential and important Byzantine participant of the entire crusading movement. It was his reported call for aid from the West against the forces of Islam that may have either led to the calling of the First Crusade by Pope Urban II, or at least provided additional justification in the West for the expedition. Alexius I was emperor during the turbulent years of 1081, when the disaster at Mantzikert ten years earlier was still a source of concern for many Byzantines, until 1118 by which the crusaders had established their presence in the East through the founding of four crusader states at Jerusalem, Edessa, Antioch, and Tripoli. Alexius I understood the threat the Seljuk Turks posed to the Byzantine Empire. He had served admirably under the leadership of Romanus IV Diogenes in various engagements against the Turks and would have been well aware of the Empire's precarious status. As a result, he took part in negotiation with western leaders, perhaps directly with Robert of Flanders and to Pope Urban II through his ambassadors at the Council of Piacenza in 1095, for assistance in their conflict with the Turks. There survives a supposed letter from Alexius I to Count Robert of Flanders. Historians such as Dana Carlton Munro have argued that the surviving letter is likely a forgery, but may be based on an original appeal from Alexius for help. The account of devastation brought upon Eastern Christians as described in the letter provides much material very similar to some of the surviving accounts of Pope Urban II's speech at the Council of Clermont. Alexius I's reign is well documented by his daughter Anna Comnena, who in her work known as the Alexiad, covers her fathers dealings with the crusaders during the First Crusade. She details the shrewd political maneuverings of Alexius in dealing with the massive crusader armies that passed through Constantinople and other parts of her father's realm as they headed to the Holy Land. Alexius made each of the crusade leaders swear an unexpected oath to him with the promise of returning any lands to him that were retaken from the Turks. Things did not go as expected beginning with the conquest of Antioch during which Alexius did not provide the support he had promised and this led to the crusader's argument that their agreement with Alexius was no longer valid as he had not held up his end of the bargain. This does not mean that Alexius I did not gain from his dealings with the crusaders. Overall he came out on top, as Anna Comnena points out, by having the cities Nicaea, Chios, Rhodes, Smyma, Ephesus, Philadelphia, Sardis, and most of Asia Minor returned to his rule through the efforts of the crusaders. http://www.crusades-encyclopedia.com/alexiusI.html