Download document 8943704

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Coordinated management of meaning wikipedia , lookup

Anxiety/uncertainty management wikipedia , lookup

History of the social sciences wikipedia , lookup

Social psychology wikipedia , lookup

Process tracing wikipedia , lookup

Social perception wikipedia , lookup

Tribe (Internet) wikipedia , lookup

Development Communication and Policy Sciences wikipedia , lookup

Thin-slicing wikipedia , lookup

Models of communication wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Anales de Psicología
ISSN: 0212-9728
[email protected]
Universidad de Murcia
España
Masip, Jaume; Garrido, Eugenio; Herrero, Carmen
Defining deception
Anales de Psicología, vol. 20, núm. 1, junio, 2004, pp. 147-171
Universidad de Murcia
Murcia, España
Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=16720112
Abstract
In view of the relative disagreement among those studying deception as to how deception, the lie, or deceptive communication
should be defined, an attempt is made to integrate the views of the most influential scholars in the field in order to formulate a
comprehensive and clear-cut definition of deception. The starting point is Coleman and Kays (1981) elements of the prototypical
lie, as well as Gerald Millers (1983; Miller & Stiff, 1993) notion of deceptive communication. Deception is defined as the deliberate
attempt, whether successful or not, to conceal, fabricate, and/or manipulate in any other way, factual and/or emotional information,
by verbal and/or nonverbal means, in order to create or maintain in another or others a belief that the communicator himself or
herself considers false. Each term of this definition is discussed in detail and, in doing so, it becomes apparent that several
deception theories and a variety of social psychology and communication contributions have been integrated to build it. In addition,
some specific implications of the definition, such as the importance that the intentional element (the deliberate attempt) has for the
legal system, are discussed. The aim of this paper is to contribute to reaching an agreement among social scientists on what
should be understood as deception.
Keywords
Deception; lie; deceit; deceptive communication;
detection of deception; lie detection; concealment;
falsification.
How to cite
Complete issue
More information about this article
Journal's homepage in redalyc.org
Scientific Information System
Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal
Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative