Download Energy and Environmental Policy Frank Prager Vice President, Environmental Policy & Services

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Energy and Environmental Policy
Frank Prager
Vice President, Environmental Policy & Services
Xcel Energy
April 9, 2012
Xcel Energy Inc.
Northern States
Power Company
Minnesota
Public Service
Company of
Colorado
Northern
States Power
Company
Wisconsin






Southwestern
Public Service
Company
No. 1 wind energy provider
No. 5 in solar additions
Largest green pricing
program
4TH largest DSM program
Industry-leading voluntary
emission reductions
Leader in pursuit of new
technologies
Gas Customers
Electric Customers
1.9 M
3.4 M
How Electricity is Made
U.S. Utility System
National Transmission Grids
Investor Owned Utility Finance
 Most utilities are subject to “cost of service” regulation
▬ Earn on prudent capital investments
▬ ROE set by PUCs
▬ Rate cases establish rates and bills
 Need a reasonable return to raise capital
▬ Stock / debt
▬ Risk issues
Xcel Energy and
Energy / Environmental Policy
 Energy portfolio closely tracks nation’s energy mix
▬ Difference: Renewable energy
▬ Impact of policy on Xcel Energy indication of effect on nation
Nuclear
20%
Hydro
Renewables
7%
4%
Natural Gas
24%
Coal
45%
U.S.
Hydro
Nuclear 5%
12%
Renewables 9%
Natural
Gas
24%
Coal
50%
Xcel Energy
Electric Generating Resources
COAL
 Low price
NATURAL GAS
 Lower capital than
coal
 Relies on
existing capital
 Environmental
challenges
▬ CO2
 Operational
benefits
 Lower emissions
 Historic price
volatility
▬ Other
Pollutants
 Permitting new
plants difficult
 New shale gas
resources
▬ “Fracking”
▬ 100 year low
cost supply?
RENEWABLES
NUCLEAR
 No emissions
 Zero emissions
 Political
 Excellent
acceptance
 Large capital,
but with
declining costs
baseload
resource
 Extremely high
capital
▬ Relies on
 Post-Fukashima
subsidies
regulatory and
safety concerns
 Usually
intermittent –
integration
challenges
 Public and
political
concerns
OUR GOAL – BALANCE AND DIVERSITY
EPA’s Regulatory Agenda
 EPA is implementing an unprecedented series of major
rulemakings affecting coal-fired electric utilities
▬ Most are focused on air quality
▬ Billions of dollars in emission controls
▬ Widespread power plant retirements
 Timing
▬ Usually requires compliance within three to five years
▬ Need several years for planning, engineering,
procurement and installation
▬ Concern about infrastructure capabilities, uncertainty,
“stranded” investments
 Xcel Energy’s leadership strategy reduces cost and risk
Climate Change
 Concentrations of CO2 in atmosphere are rising
▬ Pre-industrial level: 280 ppm
▬ Current level: 380 ppm
▬ Projected BAU level in 2100: 700 – 1100 ppm
 Goal of climate change policy:
▬ Stabilize atmospheric levels
▬ Reduce emissions
 Climate change debate has shifted
▬ Science no longer “settled”
in public discourse
U.S. Greenhouse Gas
Emission by Sector (2005)
Residential U.S. Territories
5%
1%
Commercial
6%
Agriculture
8%
Power Sector
33%
Industrial
19%
Transportation
28%
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
The Challenge of Climate Change
 Climate Change policy will require:
▬ Significant emission reductions
▬ Huge capital investments
▬ Long-term technological
transformation
▬ A diverse portfolio of resources
 Utilities will bear the lion’s share of
the reductions
▬ Key issue: maintaining
reliability and reasonable price
 Clean technology will lead the way
 Or…Will there be any national
climate policy?
Federal Legislation:
What is “Cap and Trade?”
 “CAP”: National limit on CO2 / greenhouse gas emissions




▬ One allowance = right to emit one ton of CO2
▬ Cap decreases over time
“TRADE”: Allowances may be bought or sold
▬ Goal: Use allowance market to find the most cost-effective
emission reductions
Details of policy have a great effect on cost
▬ Key Design Issues: Allocation/Auction; Credit for early
action
Political perspective: “Cap and Tax”
But…EPA already moving forward to regulate CO 2
▬ Likely to be Inflexible/Expensive
▬ March 27: EPA bans new coal plants
A Coal Plant Owner’s Dilemma
Retire and Replace with NGCC
Higher Operating Costs?
Invest in Environmental Retrofits
More Retrofits in the Future?
Future Carbon Costs?
The Election and the Environment
Xcel Energy’s
Environmental Leadership Strategy
 Goal: “Clean Energy That Works for You”
▬ Maintain traditional role – reasonably
priced, reliable energy
▬ Meet interests of communities
▬ Assess and employ new technologies
▬ Create value for customers, shareholders
and employees
▬ Address long-term regulatory risk through
balanced, diverse energy portfolio
 Components
▬ Renewable Energy
▬ Energy Efficiency
▬ Emission Reductions
Our Renewable Energy Advantage
 Nation’s #1 wind provider
▬ Great wind resources
▬ Most aggressive state
renewable standards
 Leader in solar technology
advancement
▬ Solar Technology
Acceleration Center
(SolarTAC)
MW
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Xcel Energy Wind and Solar Capacity
Solar
Wind
2006
2009
2015
2020
Energy Efficiency (DSM):
Nation’s Fourth Largest Program
2008
2010
System-wide DSM Achievements (GWh)
482
626
System-wide DSM Spending ($ Million)
$71.5
$146
Emissions Reduction:
Overview of Major Activities & Rationale
Retrofit
“Anchor”
Coal Units
Colorado Comanche 3 (2004)


Retrofit Two Units (700 MW)
Construct New Supercritical Coal Unit (750 MW)
Reduce
Environmental
Risk
Colorado Clean Air-Clean Jobs Act (2010)
Retire
“Heritage”
Coal Units




Retrofit Three Units (951 MW)
Retire Four Units (551 MW)
Repower One Unit to Natural Gas (352 MW)
New Cherokee NGCC Unit (569 MW)
Maintain
Reasonable
Long-Term
Cost
Make New Plant and Retrofit Investments on Favorable Terms
Xcel’s Declining CO2 Emissions:
2003 to 2020
Million Tons
100
95
90
25%
Reduction
2003-2020
85
80
75
70
65
60
2003
2020
Sound Energy, Environment
and Climate Policy Should…
 Set emission targets and timetables that:




▬ Are achievable
▬ Protect reliability
▬ Promote a balanced, diverse energy
portfolio
▬ Minimize costs
Be flexible and use market-based approaches
Allow a broad range of compliance options
▬ Retrofit, repowering and efficiency improvements
Avoid inefficient mandates to retrofit retiring units
Provide credit for early action
Sound Energy, Environment
and Climate Policy Should…
 Assure recovery of costs
 Coordinate federal environmental goals with state regulatory
processes
 Create a climate of certainty to promote investment of capital
 Promote the use of clean technology