Download CHAPTER 5 : EXAMPLES IN QUANTUM γ e- → γ e- ∎ ELECTRODYNAMICS

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Identical particles wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup

ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup

Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup

Technicolor (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Introduction to quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Photon wikipedia , lookup

Lepton wikipedia , lookup

Quark wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Strangeness production wikipedia , lookup

Muon wikipedia , lookup

Grand Unified Theory wikipedia , lookup

Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Feynman diagram wikipedia , lookup

Propagator wikipedia , lookup

Light-front quantization applications wikipedia , lookup

Cross section (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Monte Carlo methods for electron transport wikipedia , lookup

DESY wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup

Quantum chromodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
CHAPTER 5 : EXAMPLES IN QUANTUM
ELECTRODYNAMICS
These are the processes that are
calculated in chapter 5:
∎ e+ e- → μ+ μ-
This is a basic example in QED. Also important
because of the similar process e+ e- → q qbar,
which proved the quark model and QCD by
describing qqbar → hadrons; PETRA (DESY) and
PEP (SLAC) accelerator experiments.
∎ e- + μ- → e- + μ-
An example of crossing symmetry.
Is scattering by a muon realistic? No, but the
muon could be the projectile. also important
because of the similar process e- + q → e- + q,
which occurs in electron-proton deep-inelastic
scattering (ep DIS); SLAC and HERA (DESY)
experiments.
∎ γ e- → γ eCompton scattering.
∎ e+ e- → γ γ
Pair annihilation into photons.
Other examples
∎ e- e- → e- eMoller scattering. This is interesting as an
example of identical particles.
∎ e+ e- → e+ eBhabha scattering. This process is used to
determine the luminosity of e+ ecollisions. Provides the best upper limit
on the radius of the electron.
1
THE FEYNMAN RULES FOR QED
●
draw the topologically distinct
connected diagrams.
●
vertex factor = e γμ ; 4-momentum is
conserved at the vertex.
●
fermion propagator = SF(p)
●
photon propagator = Dμν(q)
●
external fermion leg = a Dirac spinor;
u(p,s), u(p,s), v(p,s), v(p,s)
●
external photon leg = a polarization 4vector; εμ(q)
●
verify the relative signs !
E E-bar → Mu Mu-bar
e-(p1) +e+(p2) → μ-(p3) +μ+(p4)
p1μ + p2μ = p3μ + p4μ
There is only one Feynman diagram
Thus the transition matrix element is
2
☆ For unpolarized annihilation, average
over s1 and s2 , and sum over s3 and s4 .
The goal is to calculate the cross section.
Recall the steps in the calculation.
☆ Square M
☆ Calculate the traces
3
4
☆
Substitute Mandelstam variables (See page 156)
☆ The center-of-mass differential cross
section
☆ Result
5
6
We can approximate m = 0
because m << M and m << E.
Then the result is PS equation
5.12.
7
8
Electron - positron annihilation to hadrons
These were important experiments in the history of high-energy physics.
From the particle data group, the figure shows the ratio
R = σ ( e e → hadrons ) / σ ( e ebar → μ μbar) .
The underlying process in hadron production is e- + e+ → q + qbar.
Neglecting QCD interactions we would just have R = constant (green = naive quark model; red = QCD 3rd order).
9
The √{s} dependence is due to 2 effects:
● thresholds
● resonances
But between thresholds we do indeed have
R ≈ constant.
And we can even estimate the constant:
above the b-quark threshold,
R = Σ eq2 / e2
= ( 1/9 + 4/9 + 1/9 + 4/9 + 1/9) × 3
= 11 /3 = 3.67 .
This is a great success of QCD.
Historically, measurements of R provided
evidence for the quark model and QCD.
10