Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem wikipedia , lookup
Vincent's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Real number wikipedia , lookup
Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup
System of polynomial equations wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup
MATH 355 HW # 2 SOLUTIONS Here are your solutions to HW # 2, I’m still working on the grading but thought you would enjoy these solutions. Enjoy!!! 2.2.3 There are three inequalities to prove, the middle inequality is obvious since A is nonempty. So suppose A ⊆ B. We must prove inf(B) ≤ inf (A), and sup(A) ≤ sup(B). To prove the first inequality, we claim that inf(B) is a lower bound for A, and we prove this first. Notice that by definition, inf(B) is a lower bound for B, and as a result inf(B) ≤ b for every b ∈ B. But this is also the case for every b ∈ A, since A ⊆ B. So, inf(B) is a lower bound for A. As a result, the inf(A) must be greater than or equal to inf(B), since the inf(A) is the greatest lower bound, and inf(B) is merely just one lower bound. To prove the other inequality, we prove first that sup(B) is an upper bound for A. By definition, sup(B) is an upper bound for B, so that sup(B) ≥ b for every b ∈ B, and since A ⊆ B, it must be that sup(B) ≥ b for every b ∈ A. The sup(A) is the least upper bound, which means it is less than or equal to the upper bound sup(B). 2.2.9 Consider the sets A = B = {−1, 0}. Clearly sup(A) = sup(B) = 0. However, by direct computation, C = {0, 1}, and so sup(C) = 1 6= sup(A) sup(B) = 0. 2.3.3 (b) sup(Q) = ∞, and inf(Q) = −∞. (c) sup({n − n1 |n ∈ N}) = ∞, and inf({n − n1 |n ∈ N}) = 0. 2.3.4 Let x < y be given real numbers. Then by the density of Q in R, there exists a rational number q with √ √ x − 2 < q < y − 2. It follows that √ x < q + 2 < y, √ and by Exercise 2.1.1, q + 2 is irrational. 2.4.9 We express A × B as the countable union of countable sets, and then deduce that A × B is countable by Theorem 2.4. Notice that A × B = ∪a∈A {(a, b)|b ∈ B}. Each of the sets {(a, b)|b ∈ B} ∼ B, and since B is countable, so must {(a, b)|b ∈ B} be countable. Further, the index set A is countable, and so there are a countable number of these sets in this union. Therefore A × B is the countable union of countable sets, and the result follows by Theorem 2.4. 1 2 MATH 355 HW # 2 SOLUTIONS 2.4.10 Suppose to the contrary that A\B is countable, but that A is uncountable and that B is a countable subset of A. Then we would have A = (A\B) ∪ B, and so A would be countable, as the union of the countable sets A\B and B. But this contradicts the assumption that A is uncountable. (Note that this is a proof that the set of irrational numbers is uncountable, where A = R, and B = Q.)