Download Palliative care

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Palliative care in the US
David J Casarett MD MA
Division of Geriatrics
University of Pennsylvania
Outline
 Death and dying in the US
 What is a good death?
 Problems/opportunities for improvement:
» Pain and symptom management
» Prognosis
» Discussions/preferences
 Solutions?
» Hospice
» Palliative care
 Ideal palliative care in the US
Death and dying in the US:
Cause of death (2000)
 #1: Heart disease
 #2: Cancer
 #3: Cerebrovascular disease
 #4: Chronic lower respiratory disease
 #5: Unintentional injuries
 #6: Diabetes
 #7: Acute respiratory infection
 #8: Alzheimer’s Disease
 #9: Renal Failure
 #10: Sepsis
Trajectories of functional decline
CHF/COP
D
Cancer
Dementia
Death and dying in the US:
Trajectories of illness (>65)
On average, >2 years of significant disability
before death
Illness that will eventually be fatal is
diagnosed about 3 years before death
80% of patients die after a lengthy period of
decline that is either:
» Steady, unidirectional (Dementia)
» Intermittent with exacerbations (Heart failure,
Emphysema, Coronary Artery Disease, Cancer)
Death and dying in the US: Costs
Costs
Lifespan (years)
Epidemiology: General points
Most deaths in the US occur in patients > 65
year old
Deaths are usually the result of chronic,
progressive illness, particularly in older
patients
Costs (borne by health system, patients,
families) increase gradually over the last
years of life
How well are we doing in ensuring a
good death?
What is a good death?
How well are we doing in providing a good
death?
» Pain and symptom management
» Discussing prognosis
» Communication about goals and preferences
What is “a good death”?
Unique to each individual and dependent on
culture (Have to ask patient)
But several clear themes:
»
»
»
»
»
»
Physical comfort
Psychological/emotional well-being
Spiritual peace
Dignity
Control
Time with family, closure
How well are we doing?
Pain and symptom epidemiology
Multisite WHO collaborative study of cancer
patients, Vaino et al 1996:
»
»
»
»
»
»
Moderate-severe pain:51%
Anorexia: 30%
Weakness: 25%
Constipation: 29%
Nausea: 20%
Dyspnea: 21%
How well are we doing?
Pain and symptom management
Multisite inpatient SUPPORT study, Lynn:
»
»
»
»
Severe pain: 40%
Severe dyspnea: 40-50%
Confusion: 18%
Fatigue: 80%
Multisite ECOG cooperative study, Cleeland:
» 67% any pain
» 42% of those with pain had inadequate analgesic
medications prescribed
» Inadequate analgesia 3x as common among
minorities
How well are we doing?
Communication
44% of bereaved family members of
elderly deceased cited communication
about prognosis as very important,
Hanson 1997
85% of cancer patients stated that they
wanted all information, good and bad,
Cassileth 1980
Challenges of estimating prognosis:
How long will this patient live?
Patient:
» 74 year old
» Class IV heart failure (symptoms at rest)
» Diabetes, renal failure
1-2 months
How accurate are we at
prognostication?
Study
Median
Estimate
Median
Actual
Estimate/
Actual
Parkes, 1972
4.5
2.0
1.8
Heyse-Moore, 8
1987
2
4
Forster, 1988
7
3.5
2
Christakis,
2000
N/A
N/A
5.3
How good are we at communicating
prognosis estimates?
326 patients referred to hospice by 258
physicians, Lamont 2001
» Overestimated prognosis by factor of 1.2
» Communicated an overestimated prognosis by
factor of 3.5
How well are we doing?
Communication about preferences
SUPPORT study, SUPPORT investigators 1995:
» 47% of physicians knew when their patients wanted
to avoid CPR
» 40% of patient/family-physician pairs discussed CPR
Medicare resource use study, Teno 2002:
» 20% of seriously ill Medicare patients said their care
was too aggressive
Summary of problems and
opportunities
 Pain and other symptoms
» Common
» Often poorly managed
» Uneven burden (non-white patient, older patients)
 Prognosis
» Inaccurate
» Difficult to communicate
 Communication
» Inadequate attention to patient preferences
» Missed opportunities to initiate discussions
Solutions
Palliative care
Two ways of delivering palliative care in the
US:
» Hospice
» Palliative consults
Palliative care
Palliative care is an approach that improves
the quality of life of patients and their families
facing the problems associated with lifethreatening illness…(WHO):
»
»
»
»
Symptom relief
Psychological and spiritual well-being
Maintains function
Applicable throughout serious illness
2 definitions of palliative care
Narrow definition: “Comfort care”, focus only
on providing comfort and relieving symptoms.
Palliative care provided near the end of life
when there are no further treatment options
Broad definition: WHO definition, holistic care
provided throughout illness. Palliative care
provided when there are no further treatment
options and in parallel with active treatment.
2 Definitions of palliative care:
Active treatment
Comfort
care
Throughout illness
Diagnosis
Death
How can we improve end of life
care?
Patient: 74 years old, CHF, diabetes.
» Symptoms: Pain, dyspnea
» Uncertainty about prognosis
» Needs additional social support at home
Hospice care in the US
 Hospice industry:
» ~5,200 organizations nationwide
» >1,300,000 patients/year
 Interdisciplinary team (Physician, nurse, social
worker, chaplain, volunteer)
 Hospice services
»
»
»
»
»
Care provided in home, acute care, long term care
Medications related to hospice diagnosis
Respite care (5 consecutive days)
Home health aide services (2 hours/day)
Bereavement follow up and counseling for >1 year
Hospice eligibility
 Prognosis of 6 months or less if the illness runs its
usual course, according to 2 physicians
» Referring MD
» Hospice medical director
 Hospice reimbursement often requires that additional
criteria are met:
» Developed by NHPCO
» Promulgated by Fiscal Intermediaries
» Complex, difficult for clinicians to remember and use
effectively
Hospice: an ideal solution?
“Narrow”/Comfort care
Theoretical problems:
» Eligibility is difficult to determine
» Prognosis is challenging
» Must give up access to many life-sustaining
treatments:
• ICU admission
• Chemotherapy (unless it’s purely palliative)
• Not CPR (DNR order not required)
Hospice: an ideal solution?
Uneven access (decreased hospice referrals
among):
»
»
»
»
Younger patients
African Americans
Nursing home residents
Patients with non-cancer diagnoses
Hospice: an ideal solution?
Practical problems:
» Late referrals
• Median length of stay in hospice=21 days
• 1/3 referred in last week of life
• 10% referred in last 24 hours
» Early referrals
• 6% of patients “outlive” the hospice benefit
• Concerns (among physicians and hospices) of
censure/non-payment for inappropriate referrals
Hospice summary
 Ideal source of care
» Interdisciplinary team
» Range of benefits and services
 Extensive infrastructure
 Revenue stream
 But:
» Requires prognostic estimates
» Penalties for inappropriate referrals
» Result is very short lengths of stay and inadequate utilization
Alternative: Palliative consults
Consultation by a nurse or physician
Done in multiple settings:
»
»
»
»
Hospital (approximately 40% of hospitals)
Nursing home
Clinic
(Home)
Palliative consults: eligibility
Broad definition of eligibility
» All patients, regardless of prognosis
» Can continue to receive aggressive treatment
Palliative consults: Services
Services vary widely
Some combination of:
»
»
»
»
Physician
Nurse
Social worker
Chaplain
Palliative consults: Problems
Unlike hospice, no dedicated source of
funding
Consult services supported financially by:
»
»
»
»
Some billing of insurance companies
Donations
Volunteer effort
“cost savings”
Lack of funding has limited growth
Summary of hospice and palliative
care
Hospice:
» Home/hospital/nursin
g home
» Dedicated funding
» Clear guidelines and
requirements for
services
» System of quality
measurement
» Strict eligibility
criteria
Palliative care
» Mostly hospital,
some nursing home
» No dedicated
funding
» No guidelines and
requirements for
services
» No system of quality
measurement
» Open eligibility
criteria
Ideal palliative care?
Continuous—ensuring that all patients have
access when they need care
Begins at diagnosis, and continues through to
include bereavement support for family
Paid for like other medical care
Clear standards for high-quality care
Ideal palliative care doesn’t exist in the US
The future of palliative care in the US
Growing palliative consults:
» Extension into nursing homes
» Care for patients at home
Increasing access to hospice:
» More patients benefiting
» Patients enrolling earlier
Progress is slow but steady
Outline
 Death and dying in the US
 What is a good death?
 Problems/opportunities for improvement:
» Pain and symptom management
» Prognosis
» Discussions/preferences
 Solutions?
» Hospice
» Palliative care
 Ideal palliative care in the US