Download Small Group Communication

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Small Group
Communication and
Team Leadership
Are five heads really better
than one?
Why Work in Groups?
evidence of increased creativity
 increased commitment to implementation
 recognition of the potential contributions of
workers outside of management
 opportunities for anonymity
 relational benefits

Prof. Nick Burnett, ComS 103, Sec. 1118, ' 07
What Happens When a Group
is Too Large...
formation of subgroups
 unequal participation, less per member
 increased likelihood of domination
 higher demands on the leader
 needs higher tolerance for group takeover
of administrative tasks
 more trouble achieving consensus

Prof. Nick Burnett, ComS 103, Sec. 1118, ' 07
Possible Disadvantages to Groups
The potential for “social loafing”
 One person may dominate the discussion
 “I’d rather do it myself” syndrome
 Pressure to conform
 Risky shift phenomenon

Prof. Nick Burnett, ComS 103, Sec. 1118, ' 07
Definitions--Small Group
Communication
Gaut and Perrigo--” a collection of three or
more individuals who interact with one
another to achieve a common task or goal”
 questions--when is a group too big to be a
small group….must the interaction be face
to face?

Prof. Nick Burnett, ComS 103, Sec. 1118, ' 07
Typologies of Groups in
Organizations
 Learning
Groups
 Self Maintenance Groups
 Problem Solving Groups
 Therapeutic Groups
Prof. Nick Burnett, ComS 103, Sec. 1118, ' 07
Drucker’s Group Typology
Work teams--like a baseball team--on not
in a team
 Cross functional teams--like a football
team--each with primary responsibilities
but contingency recognized
 Self managed teams--like a doubles team
in tennis--no leaders, fully interchangeable

Prof. Nick Burnett, ComS 103, Sec. 1118, ' 07
Some Principles of Small Group
Leadership
 Leadership
is not always vested in
the formal leader of a group
 Leadership is multi-dimensional
task orientation
socio-emotional orientation
 Leadership cannot always be
compelled
Prof. Nick Burnett, ComS 103, Sec. 1118, ' 07
3 Styles of Group Leadership-Autocratic
Autocratic or Authoritarian Leadership
Advantages--time, efficiency, large
groups, simple tasks
Disadvantages-low cohesion
 Communication behaviors
controls discussion, low involvement,
infrequent feedback, dominates
interaction

Prof. Nick Burnett, ComS 103, Sec. 1118, ' 07
3 Styles of Group Leadership-Democratic
Democratic Leadership
advantage--satisfaction, commitment,
complicated tasks
disadvantage--inefficient
 Communication behaviors
mediates conflict, encourages
participation, socio-emotional orientation

Prof. Nick Burnett, ComS 103, Sec. 1118, ' 07
3 Styles of Group Leadership-Laissez-faire
Laissez-faire Leadership
advantage--utilizes the talents of the
group
disadvantage--potential for misdirection
 Communication behaviors--facilitates
group activity but not discussion, poor
feedback, provides info at the direction of
the group

Prof. Nick Burnett, ComS 103, Sec. 1118, ' 07
Types of Small Group Decisions
 Consensus
 Compromise
 Voting
 Railroading
 Coalitions/Handclasping
Prof. Nick Burnett, ComS 103, Sec. 1118, ' 07