Download 9/25 - SMU Physics

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Propagator wikipedia , lookup

Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

Wheeler's delayed choice experiment wikipedia , lookup

Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup

Tight binding wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Identical particles wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Erwin Schrödinger wikipedia , lookup

Coherent states wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup

Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup

Max Born wikipedia , lookup

Wave function wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup

Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Bohr model wikipedia , lookup

Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup

Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Matter wave wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Particles (matter) behave as waves
and the Schrödinger Equation
1.
2.
Comments on quiz 9.11 and 9.23.
Topics in particles behave as waves:





today

3.
4.
The (most powerful) experiment to prove a wave: interference.
Properties of matter waves.
The free-particle Schrödinger Equation.
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
The not-unseen observer (self study).
The Bohr Model of the hydrogen atom.
The second of the many topics for our class projects.
Material and example about how to prepare and make a
presentation (ref. Prof. Kehoe)
Review: properties of matter waves





The de Broglie wavelength of a particle:   h p
The frequency: f  E h
The h-bar constant:  h 2
The connection between particle and wave:
 p k
 E 
Wave number and angular frequency:
k  2 
  2 T  2 f
The free-particle Schrödinger Equation

The matter waves:


2
2m
 2 Ψ  x,t 
x 2
i
Ψ  x,t 
t
The interpretation of the matter wave function:
probability density = Ψ  x,t 

2
The plane wave solution and verification:
Ψ  x,t   Aei kx t 
2
k

 2 Aei kx t 
p2
2
i  kx t 
i  kx t 
i  kx t 



ik
Ae

Ae

Ae


2m
x 2
2m
2m
2m
2
2
Aei kx t 
i
i
t
Erwin
Schrödinger,
1887-1961,
Austrian physicist,
shared 1933
Nobel Prize for
new formulations
of the atomic
theory.
 i  Aei kx t  
 Aei kx t 
2
p2
 2 Aei kx t 
Aei kx t 
 E   , 
i
2
2m
2m
x
t
Quantum but classical account
for energy E, not relativistic
Understand this plane wave


How many of you reviewed the discussions
about waves in mechanics?
Complex exponential:
Ψ  x,t   Aei kx t   Acos  kx  t   iAsin  kx  t 
ReΨ  Acos  kx  t   Asin  kx  t   2
ImΨ  Asin  kx  t 

Probability to find the particle:
probability density = Ψ  x,t   Ψ*  x,t  Ψ  x,t 
2
= Aei kxt  Aei kxt   A2
Equal probability to find the particle anywhere
 the location of this particle is uncertain, although the
momentum of this particle is certain. Why? p  k
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

Particle-wave duality  uncertainties

Plane wave of free electron:
Ψ  x,t   Aei kx t 
Momentum p  k is certain.
 Location (where to find the particle)
is not certain (equal probability).
so  p x  0    ?


On the detection screen:
Location is known (measured).
 Momentum ( p x ) is not certain.


Uncertainty? Review standard deviation:
p 
i  pi  p  ni
i ni
with p 
i pi ni
i ni
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

Because of a particle’s wave nature, it is theoretically
impossible to know precisely both its position along
on axis and its momentum component along that
axis; Δx and cannot be zero simultaneously. There is
a strict theoretical lower limit on their product:
 px  x 

2
This is called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle
(Nobel Prize 1932).
Show example 4.4 and 4.5 (student work).
Solar system
Atom model analogous
to the solar system is
wrong
Electron waves
in an atom
Werner Heisenberg
(1901 – 1976),
German physicist.
Nobel Prize in 1932
for the creation of
quantum mechanics.
Example 4.6, an application of
the uncertainty principle

Find the ground state of a
hydrogen atom (student work).

The classical mechanics approach.
Eclassical  

rmost probable
8 0 r
The quantum mechanics approach.
Ematter wave 

e2
2
2mr 2

e2
4 0 r
The ground state, the minimum
mechanical energy for the electron.
2
dE
e2
 3 
0
2
dr
mr
4 0 r
4 0 2
 5.3 1011 m  0.053nm
r
2
me
 Emin  
me4
32 
2
2
0
2
 2.2 1018 J  13.6eV
Emin
The energy-Time Uncertainty Principle and
the discussions in section 4.5

The energy-time uncertainty Principle:
 E t 

In particle physics, we estimate some particle’s lifetime by measuring its
energy (mass) uncertainty.
example: the particle π0 has a mass of 134.98 MeV, decays into two
photons. Its mean lifetime τ = 8.4×10-17 sec, derived from its width of
0.0006 MeV in its mass measurement.
Et
t


2
 6.6 1022 MeV  s
0.0006MeV 111017 s
By measuring the energy spread (uncertainty) of an emitted photon, we
estimate the time an atom stays at a certain excited state.
The Not-Unseen Observer: please read section 4.5 after the class.
Discuss with me in office hours if you have questions about this
section.
The Bohr Model of the hydrogen atom

The classical approach:
2
1 2
e
e2
v2
KE

mv


m

2
8 0 r
4 0 r 2
r
1
E  U  KE  

E can take any value,
8 0 r for r is continuous.
e2
Bohr postulates: the electron’s angular momentum L
may only take the values:
Ln
where n  1, 2,3...
Because L  mvr We have mvr  n
e2
v2
m
Coulomb force hold the electron in place:
2
4

r
r
0
2
 4 0  n 2
 r
me 2
4 0  2

 0.0529 nm
For n = 1, the Bohr radius a0 
me 2
1
The energy E  
e2
8 0 r

me4
2  4 0 
2
2
1
1


13
.
6
 eV 
n2
n2
Niels Henrik David
Bohr (1885 – 1962),
Danish physicist.
Nobel Prize in 1922
for work on atomic
structure.
The Bohr Model of the hydrogen atom
Hydrogen spectrum
n
E  
E
n3
2 c
e2
8 0 r


n2
, c  197 MeV  fm
me4
2  4 0 
2
2
1
1


13
.
6
 eV 
n2
n2
1 1 
 R  2  2  R  1.0972 107 m 1

1 n 
1
n2
Review questions



If a particle is confined inside a boundary of
finite size, can you be certain about the particle’s
velocity at any given time?
Why the Bohr’s hydrogen model is flawed?
If you have problem in understanding example
4.6, you need to see me in my office hour.
Preview for the next class

Text to be read:

In chapter 5:





Section 5.1
Section 5.2
Section 5.3
Section 5.4
Questions:



How would you generalize the Schrödinger equation we have
discussed in chapter 4 to include conservative forces?
Give an example of a classical bound state.
If a particle falls into a potential well (a quantum well), how
do you determine whether it is bounded?


Class project topic, 2 and
how to prepare for a presentation
Quantum physics in renewable energy.
How to prepare for a presentation:

Reference:
http://www.physics.smu.edu/kehoe/3305F07/3305Present.pdf
http://www.physics.smu.edu/kehoe/hep/WhyMass.pdf
Homework 6, due by 10/2
1.
2.
3.
4.
Problem 13 on page 134.
Problem 16 on page 134.
Problem 43 on page 137.
Problem 54 on page 138.