Download Document

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Childhood immunizations in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Common cold wikipedia , lookup

Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Rheumatic fever wikipedia , lookup

Sinusitis wikipedia , lookup

Gastroenteritis wikipedia , lookup

Infection wikipedia , lookup

Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae wikipedia , lookup

Urinary tract infection wikipedia , lookup

Infection control wikipedia , lookup

Clostridium difficile infection wikipedia , lookup

Staphylococcus aureus wikipedia , lookup

Traveler's diarrhea wikipedia , lookup

Neonatal infection wikipedia , lookup

Hospital-acquired infection wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Prophylactic Antibiotics in
Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
John Meehan, Amir A. Jamali and Hien Nguyen
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2480-2490. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01219
Introduction
 Prophylactic antibiotics:
achieve serum and tissue drug levels,
for the duration of the operation,
the minimum inhibitory concentration
 Broad-spectrum antibiotics
multi-drug-resistant organisms
Current Infection Rates Associated with Elective
Primary THA and TKA
 Primary THA is associated with a 90day deep-infection rate of 0.24%
--United States Medicare population 2003
 Overall infection rate of 2.23% in
association with primary THA
(within one year)
0.23% rate of deep incisional infection
0.18% rate of deep joint involvement
--Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Service in Britain
 Primary TKA reveal a 90-day deepinfection rate of 0.4%, 2% at one year
--Medicare
 Average rate of deep infection at one
year
THA: 0.25% ~ 1.0%
TKA: 0.4% ~ 2%
Historical Perspective: Investigations of the Role
of Prophylactic Antibiotics in General and
Orthopaedic Surgery
 1957 Tachdjian and Compere
a more than twofold increase in the rate
of infections in patients treated with
perioperative antibiotics
 1961 Burke
Staphylococcus aureus had a maximal
susceptibility to an antibiotic when the
antibiotic was present within the tissue
before the bacteria were introduced
 1970 Fogelberg
mold arthroplasties and spinal fusions
prophylactically with penicillin
5 days postoperatively: 1.7% vs. 8.9%
Penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus in all major orthopaedic
wound infections
10% in the first year  31% in the
second year  60% in the third year
Other Measures to Reduce Infection Rates
 1972 Sir John Charnley
clean air technology (laminar flow),
reinforcement of surgical gowns, and
double gloves.
7% in 1960  0.5% in 1970
 1982 Lidwell
ultraclean-air: 0.6% vs. control: 1.5%
Common Causes of Surgical Site Infections
in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
 Gram-positive organisms are the
most common:
Staphylococcus aureus,
Staphylococcus epidermidis,
Enterococcus, Streptococcus
 Gram-negative organisms less
common:
Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas
species, and Klebsiella species
 Bacterial biofilms: produced by
Staphylococcus aureus and
Staphylococcus epidermidis
 more difficult to treat, restricted
penetration of antimicrobials
 1999 Ritter
the quantity of people in the
operating room as a source of
increased bacterial counts
Properties of a Prophylactic Antibiotic
 Bacteriostatic agents inhibit the growth and
reproduction of bacteria without killing
them.
 Bactericidal antibiotics kill the bacteria.
 Most of the prophylactic antibiotics used in
orthopaedic surgery are categorized as
bactericidal:
penicillins, the cephalosporins, vancomycin,
and the aminoglycosides
 Most important consideration:
spectrum of action
 Other factors: half-life, therapeutic
tissue concentrations, the costs of
drug monitoring, administration,
repeat doses, adverse effects, and
failure of prophylaxis (wound
infection sequelae)
Prophylactic Antibiotics in Institutions
with Low Bacterial Resistance
 The cephalosporins (specifically, cefazolin
and cefuroxime)
both the prophylaxis and the treatment of
orthopaedic infections:
- favorable activity against gram-positive
organisms
- excellent distribution profiles in bone,
synovium, muscle, and hematomas
- minimum bactericidal concentrations
achieved rapidly
 Anaphylactic reactions to cephalosporins
are rare:
skin rash (1%~5%), eosinophilia
(3%~10%), diarrhea (1%~10%),
pseudomembranous colitis (<1%)
 Clindamycin is currently the preferred
alternative antibiotic
adverse effect: Clostridium difficileassociated diarrhea (the most frequent
cause of pseudomembranous colitis), rash,
abdominal pain, cramps, and in high doses
a metallic taste in the mouth
Dosage of Parenteral Antibiotic
Prophylaxis
dose
readministered
cefazolin
<80 kg: 1.0 g
>80 kg: 2.0 g
every two to
five hours
cefuroxime
1.5 g
every three to
four hours
clindamycin
600 to 900 mg every three to
six hours
Timing of Parenteral Antibiotic Prophylaxis
 1994 Classen
the rate of infection was lowest for patients who had
received an antibiotic from 0 to 2 hours before the
incision.
 1988 Bannister
proximal tourniquet is used in knee replacement
surgery, the entire dose should be administered prior
to inflation of the tourniquet
 Both the American Academy of Orthopaedic
Surgeons(AAOS) and the Surgical Care Improvement
Project(SCIP) recommend that prophylactic antibiotics
be completely infused within one hour before the
surgical incision
Duration of Parenteral Antibiotic
Prophylaxis
 1984 Williams and Gustilo
3-day vs. 1-day course
 no difference in the deep-infection
rate (2 g of cefazolin)
 1986 Heydemann and Nelson
24-hour regimen vs.7-day regimen
 no difference (nafcillin or cefazolin)
 1994 Mauerhan
1-day regimen vs. 3-day regimen
 no significant difference
(prospective, doubleblind, multicenter
study of 1354 patients, cefuroxime)
 Postoperative administration of
prophylactic antibiotics should not
exceed twenty-four hours regardless
of the use of catheters or drains
Thanks for Your Attentions