Download Shane Burgess

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
AgBase
Shane Burgess, Fiona McCarthy
Mississippi State University
1. Who we are
• Ontology users:
– Experimentalists: model our own functional genomics data sets
– Tool developers: develop ontology-based tools for functional
modeling
– Ontology training: train researchers in the use of ontologybased tools
• Ontology developers:
– Burgess: involved in development of GO immune function
– McCarthy: involved in development of GO viral process terms…
– AgBase biocurators: GO & PO new term requests and changes
during biocuration
• Ontology contributors:
– funded to provide GO annotations for chicken, agricultural
animals, maize, cotton…
– funded to provide PO annotations for maize & cotton…
2. Why we use ontologies?
• Structure: ability to organize data
• Ability to capture data as information sources
grow.
• Tools: ability to model high throughput data
sets
– summarizing function
– functional enrichment analysis
– hypothesis-testing
• Comparative biology: use of ontological data
to understand differences between species
3. Ontology Tools we are using at
AgBase
• None
• Ontology contributors:
– Initially used excel!
– Developed in house biocuration interface for
annotation
• Ontology developers:
– Mostly minor development so we only use online
ontology browser tools (e.g., QuickGO, AmiGO)
4. Roadblocks
• How to annotate increasing number of sequences from
new sequencing technologies?
–
–
–
–
No literature
Short sequences – similarity/motif finding not effective
Noncoding RNAs
Move to tissue/phenotype ontologies to capture data?
• Visualization
– How to view functional data from multiple ontologies
– Expression data, functional data and genome browser?
– How to link gene products to pathways and phenotypes?
5. Vision
• Need to employ multiple ontologies to get
comprehensive functional modeling
– cross-ontology queries
– rapidly populating other functional ontologies (where
is the “IEA pipeline” equivalent?)
– enrichment analysis tools that handle multiple
ontologies
• Manual biocuration
– more effective at targeting manual effort towards
“high importance” genes
– moving annotation data to new species (pathogens,
fungus, plants, marine invertebrates…)
6. Collaborators?
• Type of person or resource who could help?
• Where are the people driving the need?