Download Ethiopia`s Development Experience

NS4301
Summer Term 2015
Ethiopia’s Development Experience
Overview
• IMF, “Ethiopia’s Development Experience and
Comparative Analysis with Asian Peers, September 2014
• Ethiopia’s public sector led development strategy has
delivered strong results over the past decade
• However, facing significant challenges in recent years
• Analysis of the country’s investment program indicates
that despite positive long-run growth effects, the strategy
not sustainable
• Transition challenges and macroeconomic trade-offs are
associated with different financing strategies
• Case illustrates
• Links to theories earlier in the class
• Comparisons with East Asia countries
• Idea of diminishing returns to development strategies
2
Overview II
• Comparing Ethiopia's development experience with that
of selected Asian countries – especially in terms of
structural transformation and competitiveness Indicates
differences
• Point to possible adjustments in Ethiopia’s development
approach
• For Ethiopia to continue sustaining robust growth -- leveraging
the transformation of the private sector, especially entrepreneurs
is essential
3
Development Strategy I
• Ethiopia pursuing a development strategy focused on
promoting growth through high public investment
• Strategy involves
• Concentrating government expenditures on human capital and
social sectors and
• A dominant role for public enterprises in undertaking critical
infrastructure investments
• Authorities adopted a 5 year Growth and Transforming
Plan (GTP) in November 2010 which aimed at
• Average annual GDP growth of over 11 percent and
• Achieving the Millennium Development goals (MDGs)
• Among its pillars are
• Raising agricultural output and productivity
• Promoting industrialization, and
• Investing heavily in infrastructure.
4
Development Strategy II
• Economic growth averaging double-digits since 2004
• Initially led by agriculture
• Growth has been broad based
• A rising contribution from the services sector and
• Some degree of export diversification
• Ethiopia’s development approach influenced by the
recent successful transformations in East Asia between
the 1960s and 1980s
• These countries underwent rapid economic growth and
socio-economic change over period of 30 years
• With supportive public policies these countries went from
• being agrarian societies in 1960s to
• producers of high technology and high valued added goods by
the 1990s.
5
Development Strategy III
6
Development Strategy IV
7
Development Strategy V
• While Ethiopia has achieved some success over the past
decade, sustaining the ambitious economic strategy is
becoming increasingly difficult
• The macroeconomic picture is mixed
• Robust economic growth and inflation in single digits coexisting
with
• Negative short term interest rates
• An overvalued exchange rate and
• Low reserve cover in months of imports
8
Comparison with Asia Tigers I
• IMF wants to compare the experience of Ethiopia to that
of the Asian countries and highlight their key differences
• Analysis covers for each country a for a ten year period
characterized by
• high growth and
• implementation of various reforms
• Countries chosen because Ethiopia's development
approach has been influenced by their recent successful
transformations -- considered as models for Ethiopia
• China, 1982-91
• South Korea, 1968-77
• Thailand, 1970-79
• Vietnam, 2000-09 and
• Ethiopia, 2004-13
9
Comparison With the Asia Tigers II
• Structural Change, shifting resources – especially labor
from agriculture to industry important aspect of
economic development
• Experience shows that manufacturing as a share of GDP
typically climbs from about 20 percent in the low phase of
development to about 40% in the middle phase
• The employment contribution from the industrial sector
increases in importance for countries as they shift from
low income to emerging economies
• Asian countries broadly follow this pattern
• A structural sift in successful Asian countries towards
manufacturing with substantially diminished share of agriculture
• The pattern in Ethiopia shows only some shift from agriculture
toward service sector
• Share of manufacturing relatively stable and low
10
Comparison With the Asia Tigers III
11
Comparison With the Asia Tigers IV
12
Comparison With the Asia Tigers V
13
Comparison With the Asia Tigers VI
14
Comparison With the Asia Tigers VII
• Industrialization is a key strategic pillar of the GTP
• Plan envisages an increase in the share of the industrial
sector from 13 to 19% in the plan period (2010/11-2014/15)
• Implies average annual growth in the sector of 20%
• Actual performance in this sector is falling considerably
short of the plan objectives, and in marked contrast to
the Asian Countries
15
Comparison With the Asia Tigers VIII
16
Comparison With the Asia Tigers IX
17
Comparison With the Asia Tigers X
18
Comparison With the Asia Tigers XI
• Achieving and maintaining the high growth rates set out
in the GTP requires substantial capital formation and
associated resource mobilization
• With binding external financing constraints, critical
investments need to be financed from domestic sources
• Requires high levels of domestic savings
• Relatively low GDP per capita limits the potential for
domestic savings in the short run which
• Would be encouraged by offering attractive interest rate
for savers
• Ethiopia’s record in mobilizing resources compares
unfavorably with the Asian countries with domestic credit
to the private sector and gross capital formation
• While domestic resources have been crucial in financing
investment in Asia – Ethiopia less room on that front.
19
Comparison With the Asia Tigers XII
20
Comparison With the Asia Tigers XIII
21
Comparison With the Asia Tigers XIV
• Both import substitution and export promotion are key
elements in Ethiopia’s development strategy
• Export earnings provide the foreign exchange needed for
some investments that require capital goods imorts
• However the exports sector in Ethiopia has not been as
dynamic as the Asian economies while
• Import requirements have remained high relative to the
Asian countreis with the exception ov Vietnam.
22
Comparison With the Asia Tigers XV
23
Comparison With the Asia Tigers XVI
• It appears that Ethiopia’s performance has been lagging
considerably behind that of Asian competitors.
• Beyond the differences in initial conditions, this raises
the question of why Ethiopia so far has not been able to
replicate the performance of the successful Asian
countries
24
Ethiopia’s Export Competitiveness I
• Ethiopia's export competitiveness is hampered by an
overvalued exchange rate and lagging export
productivity
• Key factor in export productivity is trade costs
• Assessed using the World Bank’s Logistic Performance
Index (LPI)
• Overall LPI score measures the efficacy of a country’s
logistic based on
• Efficiency of customs clearance process
• Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure
• Ease of arranging competitive shipments in terms of price,
quality of logistics services and
• Frequency with which shipments reach destination on time
• Scores range from 1 to 5 with a higher score representing
better performance
25
• Ethiopia ranks at the bottom
Ethiopia’s Export Competitiveness II
26
Ethiopia’s Export Competitiveness III
• Ethiopia’s poor logistics raises costs for local industries
and hamper the country’s competitiveness in global
markets
• Ethiopia is a landlocked country and trade and border
logistics are critical for it to develop a thriving and
diverse export sector
• According to the World Bank (2012) it costs US$2,600 to
import a container to Ethiopia (and US $1,760 to export)
compared with US$545 in China and US$670 in Vietnam
• Thus poor trade logistics is a key contributing factor to
Ethiopia’s poor performance compared to the Asian
countries
• Ethiopian authorizes have identified logistic systems a
key priority and have tried to improve the system
• Progress has been very slow – have begun opening many
operations to private companies
27
Investment Financing Strategies I
• The high economic growth envisaged in the GTP is in line
with the country’s objectives of reaching middle income
status by 2025
• The GTP requires a large public sector borrowing and
domestic resource mobilization to finance the high levels
of investment needed to meet plan targets
• The current levels of domestic saving is insufficient to
finance the high investment (particularly public) thus
opening up a large resource gap.
• There is a risk that the investment levels envisaged under
the plan would not materialize and may outstrip the
absorptive capacity of the economy.
28
Investment Financing Strategies II
• In addition achieving the GTP’s growth objectives
requires a significant scaling up-of investment
• Plan characterized by substantial up front financing with
a significant part undertaken by public enterprises
• Financing plan in the GTP envisages borrowing levels
that average 15% GDP annually, of which some two
thirds is to be borrowed externally
• Given that external financing at appropriate terms is
constrained puts greater pressure on domestic financing
• Developments in the first three years of the GTP suggest
that the investment dive in the priority projects through
directed domestic credit is squeezing the availability of
credit and foreign exchange for the rest of the economy
29
Investment Financing Strategies III
30
Investment Financing Strategies IV
31
IMF Assessment I
• IMF analysis suggests that careful consideration needs
to be given to Ethiopia’s investment program especially
in terms of:
• Its financing options
• The impact on the private sector
• Despite positive long-run growth effects, transition
challenges and macroeconomic trade offs are associated
with the different financing options
• Heavy reliance on domestic bank borrowing may require
substantial fiscal and macroeconomic adjustments
• As well as entail sharp increase in inflation
• External commercial borrowing may ease these adjustment's but
at cost of significant increases in debt to GDP ratio
32
IMF Assessment II
• While Ethiopia’s state led development strategy has so
far generated good results in terms of economic growth
and improving social indicators
• Structural transformation towards manufacturing and
export oriented activities has not materialized as in the
successful Asian countries
• Factors hampering progress include:
• Environment hampering entrepreneurship
• Inadequate leveraging of the private sector
• Weak business climate and
• Weak incentives for domestic savings – negative interest rates,
limited financial instruments and an underdeveloped financial
system.
33
IMF: Way Forward I
• Strategy should be oriented towards the private sector
• Ethiopia's development strategy has favored heavy
investment in capital and labor
• However despite their importance capital and labor would
not be enough for high and sustained growth to take
place
• There is a need for entrepreneurship to connect them
• Entrepreneurship has played a key role in Asian
countries success
• Experience with authorities early incentives to improve
the country’s competitiveness through improvements in
the logistic system which forced them to open up to
private operators, underscores need for private sector
involvement in the country’s development process
34
The Way Forward II
• The relationship between entrepreneurship and economic
development exhibits an S-shape form depending on the
stage of development
• Different phases of development can be grouped into
three broad stages:
• Factor driven stage;
• An efficiency driven stage; and
• An innovation driven stage
35
The Way Forward III
36
The Way Forward IV
• Ethiopia appears to be in the factor driven state
• Most of the Asian comparator countries are in the
efficiency driven stage or innovation driven stage with
the exception of Vietnam
• Although Vietnam still in factor driven stage, its
performance in the WEF Global Competitiveness Index
(CGI) is much better than Ethiopia
• Vietnam ranks 70 out of 148 countries while Ethiopia
ranks 127
37
The Way Forward V
38
The Way Forward VI
39
The Way Forward VII
40
The Way Forward VIII
• Ethiopia’s policies to promote entrepreneurship –
necessary to transition out of the factor driven stage
need strengthening
• The country’s score in the 2014 Global Entrepreneurship
and Development Index (GEDI) which captures contextual
features of entrepreneurship across individual and
institutional variables is 19.8 out of 100
• Ranks 111 out of 121 countries
• Korea ranks 33, China 47
• Ethiopia’s very low score is an indication of major
obstacles for entrepreneurship
• By comparison, despite its state-led development
strategy with a strong political regime, China provides
and environment that is markedly more conducive to
entrepreneurship than Ethiopia
41
The Way Forward IX
42
The Way Forward X
• Ethiopia's aim to reach middle income levels by 2025
implies moving to the efficiency driven stage which
would necessitate a greater entrepreneurship role
• Given the importance of entrepreneurship in the
efficiency and innovation stages, it is important that the
authorities better leverage the private sector, especially
entrepreneurs
• One option – developing a proper legal framework for
public-private partnerships (PPP)
• Would incentivize private investor’s participation while
allowing the government to still have stake in ventures in
strategic sectors
43