* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Ethics in Administration
Kantian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Virtue ethics wikipedia , lookup
Cosmopolitanism wikipedia , lookup
Alasdair MacIntyre wikipedia , lookup
Secular morality wikipedia , lookup
J. Baird Callicott wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of eating meat wikipedia , lookup
Morality and religion wikipedia , lookup
APA Ethics Code wikipedia , lookup
Sexual ethics wikipedia , lookup
Aristotelian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Ethical intuitionism wikipedia , lookup
Compliance and ethics program wikipedia , lookup
Thomas Hill Green wikipedia , lookup
Clare Palmer wikipedia , lookup
Marketing ethics wikipedia , lookup
Declaration of Helsinki wikipedia , lookup
Primary care ethics wikipedia , lookup
Accounting ethics wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Medical ethics wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of technology wikipedia , lookup
Arthur Schafer wikipedia , lookup
Jewish ethics wikipedia , lookup
Social dilemma wikipedia , lookup
Ethics in Administration Program Description Whether in the public, corporate or nonprofit sector, individuals in administrative and leadership positions face unique challenges as they strive to balance competing demands, values, and constituencies. With such responsibilities also come great powers. It is easy to identify leaders who have used their positions to improve communities and create healthy and effective workplaces. Unfortunately, it is perhaps easier to identify administrators whose decisions were personally ruinous as well as destructive to employees and customers. This session will examine the competing values that create ethical dilemmas in leadership, describe a process for resolving dilemmas and discuss the resources administrators can draw on for inspiration and action in difficult situations. Participants will have the opportunity to apply these insights to ethical dilemmas drawn from various administrative roles and settings. Learning Objectives At the conclusion of the session participants will: 1. Understand ethical dilemmas arising from competing interests; 2. Possess a framework for classifying dilemmas; 3. Understand a six-step strategy for resolving ethical dilemmas; 4. Understand the principles of moral courage and the barriers to acting with courage; 5. Be able to apply these concepts to at least one dilemma arising in leadership or administrative positions; 6. Be knowledgeable about inspirational and educational resources for ethical action by administrators. Target Audience Clinicians, case managers, social workers, counselors, psychiatrists, psychologists, educators, advocates, health and human service practitioners Contact Hours 2.0 – 6.0 hours Program Agenda Available upon request. Faculty Kim Strom-Gottfried, Ph.D., received her BSW from the University of Maine, her MSW from Adelphi University, and her Ph.D. from Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland. She is the Smith P. Theimann Jr. Distinguished Professor of Ethics and Professional Practice at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, where she teaches in the areas of direct practice, education, and human resource management. Kim's practice focus is in suicide prevention, intervention, and bereavement. Her scholarly interests are in the areas of ethics, education and social work practice. She has written over 60 articles, monographs and chapters on the ethics of practice. She is the author of Straight Talk about Professional Ethics and The Ethics of Practice with Minors: High Stakes and Hard Choices and the forthcoming text Cultivating Courage. Dr. Strom-Gottfried is also the co-author of the texts Best of Boards, Direct Social Work Practice and Teaching Social Work Values and Ethics: A Curriculum Resource. Kim is formerly Associate Dean at UNC and served for 18 months as the School’s Interim Dean. She is the former chair of the National Association of Social Workers’ National Committee on Inquiry and is active in training, consultation and research on ethical practice and ethical action. In 2015 she was the recipient of an Excellence in Ethics award by the National Association of Social Workers for definitive research on ethics violations.