Download Why ADO.NET - Shawn Wildermuth

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Database wikipedia , lookup

Tandem Computers wikipedia , lookup

Microsoft Access wikipedia , lookup

Entity–attribute–value model wikipedia , lookup

Btrieve wikipedia , lookup

Extensible Storage Engine wikipedia , lookup

Microsoft Jet Database Engine wikipedia , lookup

Relational model wikipedia , lookup

Team Foundation Server wikipedia , lookup

Database model wikipedia , lookup

Open Database Connectivity wikipedia , lookup

Clusterpoint wikipedia , lookup

SQL wikipedia , lookup

PL/SQL wikipedia , lookup

Microsoft SQL Server wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
CNUG Day of .NET: October 30th
SQL Server 2005:
A Developers Introduction
Shawn Wildermuth
Magenic Technologies, Inc.
Agenda
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Who Am I?
Database Engine Enhancements
CLR Integration
InProc Managed Provider
CLR Type System
XML Changes
XML Type System
Improved Tools
Service Broker
Changes to Managed Provider (Out of Proc)
Who Am I?
•
•
•
•
•
•
Shawn Wildermuth ([email protected])
Senior Consultant with Magenic Technologies
http://adoguy.com
C# MVP
INETA Speaker
Book Author
– “Pragmatic ADO.NET”;
– Co-author of “Programming SQL Server 2005”
• Editor of http://ONDotnet.com
• This Presentation can be found at:
– http://adoguy.com/presentations
Who is ESS Magenic
•
•
•
•
•
•
Company Background
– 175+ consultants
– 10 years in business
– Regional offices
• Boston, Atlanta, Minneapolis, San Francisco, Chicago
– Gold Certified in E-Business, Business Intelligence and Microsoft
Business Solutions
.NET Experts
Authored 40+ books on .NET
Working with .NET since alphas
Microsoft Server Products Experts: Sharepoint Portal, BizTalk, SQL
Server, Commerce Server, Content Management Server
Several development efforts for a variety of Microsoft’s divisions
SQL Server 2005
• New Version of SQL Server
–
–
–
–
Planned to be deliver in 2nd half of 2005 (with crossed fingers)
More than just .NET integration
All features noted here are valid in Beta 2
MS can pull/add features at any time though
• What didn’t make it
– No row-level security (boo…hiss)
– New temporal datatypes (Date, Time, UDT Time)
Engine Enhancements
• New DataTypes
– XML Datatype
– CLR DataTypes
Engine Enhancements (2)
• T-SQL Changes
– New Exception Handling (TRY…CATCH)
– Changes to TOP syntax
• Including calculated TOP numbers and use in UPDATE and DELETE
– Common Table Expressions (CTE)
• Clearer way to make local Temp Tables and recursive queries
– New APPLY clause
• Allows a table-valued function to be called on all rows of a table
– New Security Context
• E.g. CREATE PROC spRunMe WITH EXECUTE AS OWNER
– DDL Triggers
• Allows CREATE/ALTER/DROP commands
Engine Enhancements (3)
• Data Storage Changes
– Materialized Views
• Allows Custered Indexes on Views to pre-compute a view
–
–
–
–
Persisted Computed Columns
Unified Large Object Types (e.g. varchar(max) instead of text)
Added ALTER INDEX
Non-Key columns can be added to indexes (partially clustered)
Engine Enhancements (4)
• Full-Text Engine
– Now has DDL statements
• e.g. CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX …
–
–
–
–
Can backup and restore catalogs
Can include catalogs in attach/detaching of databases
Supports Internationalization
New Thesaurus support
Engine Enhancements (5)
• Other engine changes:
– MARS Support (multiple resultsets from a single connection)
– HTTP SOAP Access through new ENDPOINTS
• Like SQL XML but supported through DDL statements
– Database Mirroring
• Way to handle fail-over without clustering
– Support for Catalog Views
• Can now query TABLES, VIEWS, INDEXES, etc.
• Supports backward compatible sys.systables, but is depreciated
CLR Integration
• Consists of two pieces:
– Managed Code
– Managed Types
– Improved Hosting Environment
• Hosting was created for an ASP.NET environment
• SQL Server’s requirements are completely opposite
CLR Integration
• Managed Code
– Stored Procedures/Functions
class Foo {
public static void Method1() {
}
}
CREATE ASSEMBLY Utilities
FROM ‘C:\assemblies\utilities.dll’
CREATE PROCEDURE Method1
AS EXTERNAL NAME Utils:Foo::Method1
exec Utils:Foo::Method1
CLR Integration (2)
• Other Managed Code
– Managed Triggers
• Can be managed code like sprocs and functions
– Custom Aggregates
• Managed Code that aggregate rows in different ways
• Finally a way to write your own MAX, AVG, etc. aggregates
In Proc Managed Provider
• SQL Server Managed Provider for Managed Code
– Used inside the Server for access to data:
//using System.Data.SqlServer;
SqlConnection conn = SqlContext.GetConnection()
SqlCommand cmd = conn.CreateCommand();
cmd.CommandText = "SELECT * from authors";
SqlDataReader r = cmd.ExecuteReader();
while (r.Read()) {
Console.WriteLine("{0} ", r["au_lname"]);
}
r.Close();
CLR Datatypes
• Can store .NET Types in database tables
– Information can be indexed
– Lots of limitations
•
•
•
•
•
•
Must support the concept of NULL.
Must support conversion to and from a string representation.
Must define the mechanism with which its state is serialized.
Must have a default (parameterless) constructor.
Must conform to SQL Naming rules (128 character maximum).
Cannot be more than 8K in size.
XML Changes
• FOR XML Changes
– Now Supports XSD
– Can return new XML datatype
– More support for handling of nulls in XML creation
XML Changes (2)
• XML Datatype
– Allowed for local variables as well as column types
– Supports XPath/XQuery searches
– Supports in-line modification of XML documents
• No need to get entire document just to add/delete/modify an element
– Support multiple types of XML Indexes
• By Path, node name or property names
XML Changes (3)
• Supports Typed XML
– Supports specifying an XSD as an XML type
– Will validate XSD on storing XML data in tables
– Not as memory restrictive as CLR Types (can be over 8K)
Service Broker
• Reliable Messaging System inside the Database
– Built-in support for asynchronous operations
– Guaranteed delivery like MSMQ
– Endpoints do not have to exist on local machine
Service Broker (2)
• Service Broker Components
– Messages
• Bits of information that describe an operation
– Contracts
• An agreement to what a message will consist of
– Queues
• FIFO stores for messages
– Services
• Code that handles a message out of a Queue
Service Broker (3)
• Other Service Broker Services
–
–
–
–
Conversation Management (discussions between services)
Transactional Support
Orchestration of Multiple Conversations
Security
Questions?
Questions?