Download Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Gasex Syrup in Functional

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Polysubstance dependence wikipedia , lookup

Clinical trial wikipedia , lookup

Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Theralizumab wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Bad Pharma wikipedia , lookup

Bilastine wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Clinical
study
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety
of Gasex Syrup in Functional
Dyspepsia
MG Shekar Kumar*, SR Prasad**, SK Mitra†
*Laparoscopic Surgeon and Consultant Urologist, Shree Sai Hospitals, Choolaimedu, Chennai, India.
**Medical Advisor,
†
Executive Director, R&D Center, The Himalaya Drug Company, Bangalore, India.
Address for correspondence:
Dr SR Prasad,
R&D Center, The Himalaya Drug Company, Bangalore.
Email: [email protected]
A significant reduction in the mean symptoms score of upper abdominal pain,
heartburn, abdominal bloating, belching and fullness of stomach after meals
were observed after 28 days of treatment with Gasex syrup.
Abstract
The present study was planned
to evaluate the clinical efficacy and
safety of Gasex syrup in functional
dyspepsia. Dyspepsia is a symptom
complex of epigastric pain or
discomfort believed to originate
in the upper gastrointestinal
(GI) tract. The pathogenesis of
functional
dyspepsia
remains
uncertain. However, symptomatic
improvement of patients with
functional
dyspepsia
with
current drug therapy is left
with many unmet needs. This is
because functional dyspepsia is
a heterogeneous disease and a
uniform response to drug treatment
can therefore not be achieved.
The present study was an open
clinical trial, conducted as per the
ethical guidelines of Declaration of
Helsinki. All patients suffering from
pain or discomfort centered in the
upper abdomen with associated
bloating, belching, vomiting and
heartburn were included in the
study and patients having severe
vomiting and diarrhea, and those
suffering with gastric or duodenal
ulcer, cancer or varices disease
were excluded from the study.
A thorough history, symptomatic
evaluation and clinical examination
was done for all patients before
treatment and during follow-up
visits every week till the end of
treatment on day 28 along with
recording the occurrence of any
adverse event/s. The predefined
primary end-points were rapid
symptomatic relief from upper
abdominal pain, heartburn and
bloating. The predefined secondary
end-points were short- and longterm safety, and overall compliance
to the drug treatment.
A total of 25 patients were
enrolled for the trial and all
patients completed the study. A
significant reduction (p < 0.0001)
in the mean symptoms score of
upper abdominal pain, heartburn,
abdominal bloating, belching and
fullness of stomach after meals
were observed after 28 days of
treatment with Gasex syrup. There
were no clinically significant
adverse events, either reported
or observed, during the entire
study period. Therefore, it may
be concluded that Gasex syrup
is clinically safe and effective in
the management of functional
dyspepsia.
Introduction
Functional
dyspepsia
is
defined as persistent or recurrent
abdominal pain or abdominal
discomfort
centered
in
the
upper abdomen which cannot
be explained by structural or
biological abnormalities1,2.
Discomfort refers to unpleasant
sensations that the subject does
not interpret as pain and may be
Indian Journal of Clinical Practice | Vol. 18 | No. 6 | Novemberber 2007
29
Clinical
study
characterized by upper abdominal
fullness, early satiety, bloating,
belching or nausea. It is estimated
that the annual prevalence of
recurrent
upper
abdominal
discomfort in the United States
and other Western countries is
approximately 25%; about 2-5% of
all primary care consultations are
related to dyspeptic symptoms3.
For many patients, the symptoms
are of short duration or mild
severity4.
Functional dyspepsia is a
highly prevalent symptom complex
and a heterogenous disorder.
Recent studies showed potential
associations
between
specific
pathophysiologic disturbances and
dyspeptic
symptoms.
Delayed
gastric emptying reported in about
30% of patients with functional
dyspepsia is associated with
symptoms of postprandial fullness,
nausea and vomiting. Impaired
gastric accommodation present
in 40% of functional dyspepsia
patients is found to be associated
with early satiety. Hypersensitivity
to gastric distension is observed
in 37% of functional dyspepsia
patients and is associated with
symptoms
of
postprandial
pain, belching and weight loss.
Psychosocial factors and altered
response to duodenal lipids or
acid have also been identified as
pathophysiologic
mechanisms.
Therapeutic options are still limited
but targeted therapy directed at
the underlying pathophysiology
seems desirable5.
Symptomatic improvement of
patients with functional dyspepsia
with current drug therapy is left
with many unmet needs. This is
because functional dyspepsia is
a heterogeneous disease and a
uniform response to drug treatment
can therefore not be achieved.
30
Pharmacological
treatment
for
patients with functional dyspepsia
remains unsatisfactory.
Gasex syrup is a polyherbal
formulation containing extracts
of Cuminum cyminum, Mentha
arvensis, Foeniculum vulgare, Elettaria
cardamomum, Apium graveolens,
Coriandrum sativum, Curcuma longa
and Trikatu, all of which are
recommended for the management
of dyspepsia. This study was
planned to evaluate the clinical
efficacy and safety of Gasex syrup
in the management of functional
dyspepsia.
Patients and methods
Inclusion criteria
All patients aged between
18 - 55 years, suffering from pain
centered in the upper abdomen
with associated bloating, heartburn,
belching and vomiting were
included in the study.
Exclusion criteria
Patients having severe vomiting
and diarrhea, irritable bowel
syndrome, diabetes mellitus, those
suffering with gastric or duodenal
ulcer, cancer or variceal disease;
and patients with history of gastric
surgery or NSAIDs intake were
excluded from the study.
Study procedure
The study was an open, nonrandomized and non-comparative,
prospective, phase III clinical trial,
conducted at Shree Sai Hospitals,
Choolaimedu,
Chennai,
India
from January 2007 to March 2007,
as per the ethical guidelines of
Declaration of Helsinki. The study
protocol, case report forms (CRFs),
regulatory clearance documents,
product-related
information,
and informed consent forms (in
Indian Journal of Clinical Practice | Vol. 18 | No. 6 | November 2007
English, Hindi and Tamil) were
submitted to the institutional ethics
committee and were approved by
the same.
The patients who attended
the OPD general surgical unit of
Shree Sai Hospitals, Choolaimedu,
Chennai, India were informed
about the study drug, its effects,
duration of the trial, and overall
plan of the study. The patients
were included in the clinical
study only after written informed
consent was obtained from them,
and a witness, independent of the
clinical trial, signed the informed
consent form.
The
history
was
noted
by
interviewing
the
patient.
Thorough
clinical
examination
and symptomatic evaluation was
carried out and the details were
noted down in the CRF. Patients
were advised to take the drug at
a dose of 2 teaspoonfuls twice a
day after meals for 28 days.
All patients were followed-up
every week till the end of treatment
on day 28 and symptomatic
evaluation and clinical examination
was done, along with recording the
occurrence of any adverse event/s
(either reported or observed).
Primary and secondary
end-points
The predefined primary endpoints were rapid symptomatic
relief from upper abdominal pain,
heartburn, bloating and fullness
after
meals.
The
predefined
secondary end-points were shortand long-term safety, and overall
compliance to the drug treatment.
Adverse events
All adverse events, either
reported or observed, were recorded
in the CRF with information
about severity, onset, duration
Clinical
study
Table 1: Reduction in Mean Symptom Score of Upper Abdominal Pain, Heartburn, Bloating,
Belching, and Fullness after Meals with Gasex Syrup Treatment
Parameter
(symptom score)
Day 0
Day 7
Day 14
Day 21
Day 28
Friedman statistic (FS)
and significance
Upper abdominal
pain
1.960
± 0.1869
1.480
± 0.1645
0.9600
± 0.1222
0.8400
± 0.1108
0.8000
± 0.1155
FS: 68.84; p < 0.0001,
significant
Heartburn
0.8800
± 0.2026
0.7200
± 0.1583
0.2000
± 0.0817
0.1200
± 0.0663
0.0800
± 0.0554
FS: 49.46; p < 0.0001,
significant
Bloating
1.640
± 0.1904
1.440
± 0.1536
1.000
± 0.1633
0.7600
± 0.1194
0.6400
± 0.1275
FS: 57.52; p < 0.0001,
significant
Belching
0.8400
± 0.1600
0.6800
± 0.1381
0.2400
± 0.0872
0.1600
± 0.0748
0.1600
± 0.0748
FS: 55.45; p < 0.0001,
significant
Fullness after meals
1.560
± 0.1833
1.320
± 0.1497
0.6800
± 0.1381
0.6000
± 0.1291
0.5600
± 0.1013
FS: 61.90; p < 0.0001,
significant
and action taken regarding the
study drug. Relation of adverse
events to the study medication
was predefined as “unrelated”
(a reaction that does not follow
a reasonable temporal sequence
from the time of administration
of the drug), “possible” (follows
a known response pattern to the
suspected drug, but could have
been produced by the patient’s
clinical state or other modes
of therapy administered to the
patient) and “probable” (follows
a known response pattern to the
suspected drug that could not be
reasonably explained by the known
characteristics of the patient’s
clinical state).
Patients
were
allowed
to
voluntarily withdraw from the
study, if they experienced serious
discomfort during the study or
sustained serious clinical events
requiring
specific
treatment.
For patients withdrawing from
the study, efforts were made to
ascertain the reason for dropout.
Non-compliance (defined as failure
to take < 80% of the medication)
was not regarded as treatment
failure, and reasons for noncompliance were noted.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was done
according
to
intention-to-treat
principles. The changes in various
*p < 0.001 as compared with day 0 value
parameters
from
pretreatment
values to posttreatment values
were analyzed by “Friedman’s
test” followed by “Dunn’s Multiple
Comparison test analysis”. The
minimum level of significance was
fixed at 95% confidence limit and
a two-sided p value of <0.05 was
considered significant.
Results
A total of 25 patients suffering
from functional dyspepsia were
included in the clinical trial and
all patients completed the study.
The study group had 15 male and
10 female patients. Mean age of
the patients was 37.48 years. Brief
*p < 0.05 as compared with day 0 value
Indian Journal of Clinical Practice | Vol. 18 | No. 6 | Novemberber 2007
31
Clinical
study
history and clinical examination
showed that out of 25 patients, all
of them were suffering from upper
abdominal pain and 13 patients
had heartburn, 21 patients had
bloating, 15 patients had belching,
21 patients had fullness after
meals, eight had nausea and one
patient had vomiting.
A
significant
reduction
(p < 0.0001) in mean symptoms
score of upper abdominal pain,
heartburn, abdominal bloating,
belching and fullness of stomach
after
meals,
were
observed
after 28 days of treatment with
Gasex syrup. The reduction in
these symptoms started appearing
on the 7th day of treatment itself
(Table 1; Fig. 1 - 5).
Nausea and vomiting was
present only in eight patients
and one patient, respectively
32
and was completely relieved by
day 7 itself.
Patient’s
global
assessment
revealed that 24% showed marked
improvement, 44% had moderate
improvement and 32% had slight
improvement after 28 days of
therapy with Gasex syrup (Fig. 6).
Investigator’s global assessment
revealed that 28% of patients had
marked improvement, 56% of
them had moderate and 16% of
them had slight improvement at
the end of treatment with Gasex
syrup (Fig. 7).
There
were
no
clinically
significant adverse events, either
reported or observed, during the
entire study period.
Discussion
Functional dyspepsia is a
common chronic disorder with
Indian Journal of Clinical Practice | Vol. 18 | No. 6 | November 2007
non-specific
upper
abdominal
symptoms
which
cannot
be
explained by organic or biochemical
abnormalities. Functional dyspepsia
is far more common than dyspepsia
due to organic disease, both in the
community and general practice.
The dyspeptic symptoms are very
compromising and bothersome and
result in a substantial reduction
of quality-of-life. The substantial
direct and indirect medical and
economical costs induce a high
socioeconomic interest in the
pathogenesis and the treatment
options of this disease.
Unlike peptic ulcer disease,
where treatment is pharmacological
and
usually
straightforward,
the management of non-ulcer
dyspepsia (as with all functional GI
disorders) is more challenging and
requires a careful dialogue between
Clinical
physician and patient. Underlying
pathophysiological disturbances are
not fully understood, but include
impaired gastric accommodation
(upto 40% of patients), delayed
gastric emptying (25-40%) and
visceral hypersensitivity (33%).
Pharmacological
treatments
are
often
disappointing
and
a significant placebo response
(20–60%) is usually seen as in
other functional GI disorders. Most
experts advocate a trial of proton
pump inhibitor and/or Helicobacter
pylori eradication, if present6,7.
Other
treatments
include
prokinetic drugs (mainly cisapride,
subsequently withdrawn in many
countries) and these may benefit
some. There are also limited
data suggesting benefit from
bismuth, misoprostol, sucralfate,
pirenzepine (antimuscarinic) and
antidepressants.
Psychological
studies have been performed using
psychotherapy, cognitive therapy
and hypnotherapy with reported
improvements in dyspepsia scores.
The present clinical study
observed a significant relief in
the symptoms of dyspepsia like
upper abdominal pain, heartburn,
abdominal bloating, abdominal
belching, fullness of stomach
after meals, nausea and vomiting
after 28 days of treatment with
Gasex syrup.
The reduction
in
these
symptoms
s t a r t e d
appearing
on 7th day
of
treatment
itself
and
complete relief
was observed
by 28 days.
There
were
no
clinically
significant adverse events, either
reported or observed, during the
entire study period.
Earlier research works on the
extracts of individual ingredients
of Cuminum cyminum, Mentha
arvensis, Foeniculum vulgare, Elettaria
cardamomum, Apium graveolens,
Coriandrum sativum, Curcuma longa,
and Trikatu were credited for
their carminative, antispasmodic,
analgesic, anti-inflammatory and
antioxidant activities.
Cuminum cyminum, belonging
to the family Apiaceae, is widely
used in Ayurvedic medicine for the
treatment of dyspepsia, diarrhea
and jaundice8.
All the herbs tested increased
acid secretion in the following
declining order: Fennel, omum,
cardamom,
cumin,
coriander.
These herbs increased gastric acid
secretion, in some by a cholinergic
mechanism
but
by
other
mechanism(s) as well9. Cumin may
protect the colon by decreasing
the activity of b-glucuronidase and
mucinase10.
“Trikatu” is an Ayurvedic
preparation
containing
black
pepper, long pepper and ginger,
which is prescribed routinely
for a variety of diseases as
part of multidrug prescriptions.
These herbs along with piperine
study
(alkaloid
of
peppers)
have
been shown to possess diverse
biological activities in mammalian
systems11.
Peppers and ginger have been
commonly used in conjunction
in folklore medicines. Modern
research, mostly European, has
documented the ability of ginger
to
stimulate
gastric
motility
(efficiency of moving food through
the digestive tract), to relieve
indigestions, and to promote
digestion. The main reason that
this herbal trio is part of so
many Ayurvedic formulations is
its proven ability to enhance GI
absorption of nutrients. Many
groups of scientific investigators
attribute
this
bioenhancing
property of pepper to its main
alkaloid, piperine12.
Mentha arvensis plant has
antispasmodic,
carminative,
cholagogic
and
antimicrobial
properties. The oil contains 95%
of menthol and offers cytotoxic
properties. The fruit of Foeniculum
vulgare
has
anti-inflammatory,
analgesic
and
antioxidant
13
activities . Elettaria cardamomum has
shown gastroprotective property in
rats14. Extract of Apium graveolens
contains apiin as the major
constituent and exerted significant
anti-inflammatory
property
in
in vivo model15. The antioxidant
activity of the aqueous extracts
of three umbelliferous fruits coriander (Coriandrum sativum),
cumin (Cuminum cyminum) and
fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) has
been demonstrated16.
Curcuma
longa
has
been
commonly used as a traditional
remedy for a variety of symptoms
such as inflammation, gastritis
and gastric ulcer. When Curcuma
longa extract was administered
per os to pylori-ligated rat
Indian Journal of Clinical Practice | Vol. 18 | No. 6 | Novemberber 2007
33
Clinical
study
stomachs, it reduced gastric acid
secretion and protected against
the formation of gastric mucosal
lesions. Therefore, it was tested
whether Curcuma longa extract
inhibits gastric ulcers by blocking
the H2 histamine receptor. These
findings suggest that the extract
from Curcuma longa specifically
inhibits gastric acid secretion by
blocking H2 histamine receptors in
a competitive manner17.
Therefore, the observed clinical
benefits of Gasex syrup might be
due to the synergistic actions of its
ingredients.
Conclusion
Functional dyspepsia is a
commonly encountered syndrome
in medical practice. Being a
multifactorial syndrome complex,
many therapeutic interventions
have been studied. However,
there is no clinically effective
and safe medication that can be
recommended in the management
of functional dyspepsia. This study
was conducted to evaluate the
clinical efficacy and safety of Gasex
syrup in functional dyspepsia.
This
study
observed
a
significant symptomatic relief from
upper abdominal pain, heartburn,
abdominal bloating, belching and
fullness of stomach after meals.
Symptomatic relief was evident
in 14 days of study in majority
of the patients, while almost all
were relieved within 28 days of
treatment. There were no clinically
significant adverse events, either
reported or observed, during the
entire study period. Therefore,
it may be concluded that Gasex
syrup is clinically safe and effective
in the management of functional
dyspepsia.
references
1. Talley NJ, Stanghellini V, Heading RC, Koch KL, Malagelada JR and Tytgat GN. Functional gastroduodenal disorders.
Gut 1999;45(Suppl. 2):II37- II42.
2. Tack J, Bisschops R and Sarnelli G. Pathophysiology and treatment of functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterol. 2004;127:
1239-1255.
3. Knill-Jones RP. Geographical differences in the prevalence of dyspepsia. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1991;182:17-24.
4. Johannessen T, Petersen H, Kristensen P, Kleveland PM, Dybdahl J, Sandvik AK, et al. The intensity and variability of symptoms
in dyspepsia. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care 1993;11:50-55.
5. Tack J and Lee KJ. Pathophysiology and treatment of functional dyspepsia. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2005;39(5, Suppl.):
S211-S216.
6. Moayyedi SS, Deeks J, Delaney B, Innes M and Forman D. Pharmacological interventions for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Cochrane
Database Syst. Rev. 2006;4:CD001960.
7. Moayyedi P, Soo S, Deeks J, et al. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.
2006;2:CD002096.
8. Dhandapani S, Subramanian VR, Rajagopal S and Namasivayam N. Hypolipidemic effect of Cuminum cyminum L. on alloxaninduced diabetic rats. Pharmacol. Res. 2002;46(3):251-255.
9. Vasudevan K, Vembar S, Veeraraghavan K and Haranath PS. Influence of intragastric perfusion of aqueous spice extracts on
acid secretion in anesthetized albino rats. Indian J. Gastroenterol. 2000;19(2):53-56.
10. Nalini N, Sabitha K, Viswanathan P and Menon VP. Influence of spices on the bacterial (enzyme) activity in experimental colon
cancer. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1998;62(1):15-24.
11. Johri RK and Zutshi U. An Ayurvedic formulation ‘Trikatu’ and its constituents. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1992;37(2):85-91.
12. James JG. Ancient art of balancing digestion, nutrient absorption and metabolism. Better Nutrition 1996; July.
13. Choi EM and Hwang JK. Anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antioxidant activities of the fruit of Foeniculum vulgare. Fitoterapia
2004;75(6):557-565.
14. Jamal A, Javed K, Aslam M and Jafri MA. Gastroprotective effect of cardamom, Elettaria cardamomum Maton. fruits in rats.
J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006;103(2):149-153.
15. Mencherini T, Cau A, Bianco G, Della Loggia R, Aquino RP and Autore G. An extract of Apium graveolens var. dulce leaves:
Structure of the major constituent, apiin, and its anti-inflammatory properties. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2007;59(6):891-897.
16. Satyanarayana S, Sushruta K, Sarma GS, Srinivas N and Subba Raju GV. Antioxidant activity of the aqueous extracts of spicy
food additives--evaluation and comparison with ascorbic acid in in-vitro systems. J. Herb. Pharmacother. 2004;4(2):1-10.
17. Kim DC, Kim SH, Choi BH, Baek NI, Kim D, Kim MJ and Kim KT. Curcuma longa extract protects against gastric ulcers by blocking
H2 histamine receptors. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005;28(12):2220-2224.
34
Indian Journal of Clinical Practice | Vol. 18 | No. 6 | November 2007