* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 2.5 Spin polarization principle 2.6 The commutator
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Quantum decoherence wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Hilbert space wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Self-adjoint operator wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Spin (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Compact operator on Hilbert space wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
2.5 Spin polarization principle An interesting feature about the physics of spins is the following statement. Any normalized vector | ai in C2 is an eigenstate of some spin operator sn = s · n̂. In other words, for an arbitrary spin state of a system we can find an orientation n̂ of the measurement apparatus that will give an experimental outcome of h̄/2 with 100% certainty. Recall that ✓ ◆ ✓ ◆ ✓ ◆ h̄ 0 nx 0 ny i nz 0 sn = + + nx 0 iny 0 0 nz 2 ✓ ◆ h̄ nz n x iny = n x + iny nz 2 Now, sn is Hermitian, so it must have an orthonormal basis. So clearly if | ai is one of those eigenvectors then with 100% certainty a measurement of sn will give the corresponding eigenvalue. One can show that the eigenvalues of sn are ± h̄/2. 2.6 The commutator When we started talking about operators that act on vectors in vector spaces we saw that the order at which operators are applied mattered and that generally we have ABv 6= BAv where A,B are two linear operators and v is a vector in some vector space. We discussed this using the example of a rotation by 90 in R2 and a projection onto the x-axis. We might ask, what is the condition for hermitian operators in C2 for this to be actually equal. Well let’s assume that both operators have identical eigenspaces A=  an |ni hn| and n B=  bn | n i h n | n where an and bn are eigenvalues of A and B respectively. In this case AB = =  a n | n i h n |  bm | m i h m | n m   a n bm | n i h n | m i h m | n = m  a n bn | n i h n | n = BA This means if two operators have the same eigenvalues the order at which they are applied is the same. Another useful way of saying this is [ A, B] = 0 46 where [ A, B] = AB BA is known as the commutator. Physically this means that the two observables that correspond to µA and B can be measured simulateneously. We say with the Stern Gerlach experiments that this isn’t the case for the different components of spin. In fact all operators si had different eigenspaces. When we look at the spin operators Sx = h̄sx /2,Sy = h̄sy /2,Sz = h̄sz /2, with the Pauli matrices ✓ ◆ ✓ ◆ ✓ ◆ 0 1 0 i 1 0 sx = , sy = sz = 1 0 i 0 0 1 We can compute the commutator ✓✓ ◆✓ h̄2 h̄2 0 1 0 [ S x , Sy ] = [sx , sy ] = 1 0 i 4 4 ◆ ✓ ◆◆ 2 ✓✓ h̄ i 0 i 0 = 0 i 0 i 4 ✓ ◆ h̄2 i 0 = 0 i 2 = ih̄Sz 0 i ◆ ✓ 0 i 0 i ◆✓ 0 1 1 0 ◆◆ Likewise we can show that [Sy , Sz ] = ih̄Sx [Sz , Sx ] = ih̄Sy so indeed the components of spin cannot be measured simultaneously. 2.7 Spinor Here’s another important viewpoint of a quantum mechanical spin. Remember that any spin state can be written as a superposition of any basis | s i = a1 | v1 i + a2 | v2 i where e.g. the basis vectors |vi i could be the pair |ui and |di or the pair |l i and |r i or any orthonormal set of basis vectors. When written this way we have | s i = a1 | v1 i + a2 | v2 i = (hv1 |si) |v1 i + (hv2 |si) |v2 i 2 =  | vi i h vi | s i i =1 and the quantities h vi | s i 47 were called probability amplitudes, because the probability of preparing a system in state |vi i when an observable is measured for which this vector is an eigenstate is given by Pi = | hs|vi i |2 Let’s think of the vectors |vi i as fixed then the state of the spin is specified by the amplitudes ( a1 , a2 ) so a pair of complex numbers that fullfill the condition  ai? ai = 1 i If we think of the basis vectors as fixed and set in stone then every quantum spin, is specified by the above pair, which is called a spinor. Note though that the actual numbers are determined by the choice of basis vectors this is wky we say that • The state of the quantum spin is DEFINED bz the vector |si • but it is represented by the spinor (a1 , a2 ) in the basis |vi i 2.8 Time passes Everything we have said so far is about states that are static, apart from what happens during a measurement. We will learn soon that generally states evolve over time. For a spin state this means that |si = |s(t)i what this means is that if we express the state as a superposition of basis vectors that we consider static, the time dependence must be in the coefficients. |s(t)i = a1 (t) |v1 i + a2 (t) |v2 i Later on, we will see what physical laws govern the time evolution of these coefficients and thus the time evolution of a quantum mechanical state. In fact we will derive an ODE for the time evolution that looks like this ih̄∂t |s(t)i = H |s(t)i where H is an operator that corresponds to the obervable energy of a system. When we look at this equation we see that the change in time is equivalent to applying the operator H to system ih̄∂t $ H This is a very fundamental connection between energy and time. A similar one we will learn about later, the connection between space and momentum ih̄∂ x $ p x ih̄∂y $ py ih̄∂z $ pz 48 or together ih̄r $ P Let’s say the above equation is true, what does this imply for the mean value of measurements of a general spin observable S? Remember that hSi (t) = hs(t)|S|s(t)i What’s the ODE for that quantity? ∂t hSi (t) = (∂t hs(t)|) S |s(t)i + hs(t)| S∂t |s(t)i H H† = hs(t)| i S |s(t)i + hs(t)| Si |s(t)i h̄ h̄ i = hs(t)| ( HS SH ) |s(t)i h̄ i ∂t hSi = h[ H, S]i h̄ This is also a very important relation which we will come back to. 2.9 Summary So, we have learned the following 1. The quantum mechanical state of a spin is defined by a two dimensional complex vector |si which is an element of C2 . 2. The state vector |si does not describe any physical properties of the system. 3. Instead, the state vector |si describes the way a system behaves when a physical property such as sx , sy , sz of generally sn is measured with an experimental apparatus. 4. The state vector |si determines the probability of measuring a value of the observable. 5. When a measurement is performed, the system ends up in one of two states | ai , |bi which are orthonormal vectors in C2 . If the state of the system is |si before the measurement, the probability that it will end up in | ai is given by |hs| ai|2 = hs| ai h a|si = hs| Pa |si 6. The physical, observable, properties of a spin are described by operators that act on the state vector. Which operators these are is determined by the measurement apparatus, for instance the orientation of the Stern Gerlach setup. Generally such an observable has the form s · n̂ 49 7. Physical observables are hermitian operators. Their eigenspaces are orthogonal and their spectrum is real. 8. Any spin observable with eigenvectors | ai and |bi and eigenvalues l a and lb can be written as A = l a Pa + lb Pb 9. The expectation (average) value of measuring A is given by h Ai = hs| A|si if the system is initially in state |si. 50 3 Particles What we said above about spins can be generalized to any quantum mechanical system. Let’s do this and then apply the principles to particles that have mass, position and momentum 1. The quantum mechanical state of a system is defined by a complex vector |yi which is an element of Hilbert space H. This space can have finite dimension of infinite dimension. H is a generalization of C2 to higher dimensions. 2. The state vector |yi does not describe any physical properties of the system. 3. Instead, the state vector |yi describes the way a system behaves when a physical property A with an experimental apparatus. 4. The state vector |yi determines the probability of measuring a possible value a of the observable A. 5. When a measurement is performed, the system ends up in one of many potential states |ni that all form an orthonormal basis of H. If the state of the system is |yi before the measurement, the probability that it will end up in |ni is given by |hn|yi|2 = hy|ni hn|yi = hy| Pn |yi 6. The physical, observable, properties of a system are described by operators A that act on the state vector. Which operators these are is determined by the measurement apparatus. 7. Physical observables are defined hermitian operators. Their eigenspaces are orthogonal and their spectrum is real. 8. Any observable with eigenvectors |ni and eigenvalues ln , n = 1, 2, ... can we spectrally decomposed A = =  ln Pn n  ln |ni hn| n 51 9. The expectation (average) value of measuring A is given by h Ai = hy| A|yi = hy|  ln |ni hn| n  ln |hn|yi| = ! |yi 2 n if the system is initially in state |yi. 3.1 Infinitely dimensional Hilbert-spaces All of the above is straightforward when we have a Hilbert space that is infinitely dimensional and we are dealing with a countable basis |ni n = 1, 2, 3, 4, ..... And when operators have a spectral decomposition A = =  ln Pn n  ln |ni hn| n this means that we can “count” the different measurement outcomes, in other words the observables that these operators correspond to are quantized. However, there are obervables that generate measurement values that are continuous, for example the position or momentum of a free particle. When we deal with such situations and corresponding Hilbert spaces we must be able to also have bases that depend on a continuous index. so |ni n = 1, 2, 3, 4, ... $ | x i x 2 R When we have a state |yi and a discrete basis and hence |yi = =  yn |ni n Â(hn|yi) |ni n =  |ni hn|yi n where the probability amplitudes yn = hn|yi . The decomposition of a vector in a continuous basis becomes ˆ dx | x i h x |yi |yi = ˆ = dx (h x |yi) | x i 52 In analogy to the above we can write y( x ) = h x |yi So this is a probability ampliute that depends on the continuous label x. We can also see that in the discrete version we have a “Zerlegung der Eins” 1=  |ni hn| n Likewise for a continous basis we have 1= ˆ dx | x i h x | So all we really have to formally remember is replacing sums by integrals ˆ  $ dx n How about the scalar product of two vectors? in a discrete system we have ! hy|fi = hy|  |ni hn| |fi n =  yn? fn n In the continous case this becomes ✓ˆ ◆ dx | x i h x | |fi hy|fi = hy| ˆ = dxy? ( x )f( x ) We can even think of the complex function y( x ) as the vectors themselves and the above integral as a dot product between two different vectors. But remember that the functions y( x ) depends on the choices of basis vectors | x i Hence they only represent the state. • The state of the system is defined by a vector |yi • it is represented by the amplitude function y( x ) (in the provided basis) This is much like a point in a plane x may have some representation ( x, y) in one coordinate system and ( x 0 , y0 ) in another coordinate system. Additng to the above, in a discrete system the normalization condition on a state vector is given by  | h n | y i |2 n 53