Download 4 Objectives and scientific priorities

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Utkast 03.05.2004
Norwegian research in the Antarctic:
Priorities for the period 2005-2009
Content
Preface ........................................................................................................................... 2
Executive summary ...................................................................................................... 2
1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 2
2 Vision.......................................................................................................................... 3
3 Rationale .................................................................................................................... 3
4 Objectives and scientific priorities .......................................................................... 5
4.1 Climate dynamics ................................................................................................. 5
4.1.1 Climatic models ................................................................................................. 5
4.1.2 Paleoclimate ....................................................................................................... 6
4.1.3 The Antarctic ice sheet....................................................................................... 6
4.1.4 Ocean circulation ............................................................................................... 7
4.2 Marine ecosystems ............................................................................................... 8
4.2.1 The carbon cycle ................................................................................................ 8
4.2.2 Ecosystem studies .............................................................................................. 9
4.3 Humans in the Antarctic .................................................................................... 11
4.4 Other research themes ....................................................................................... 11
4.4.1 Atmosphere ...................................................................................................... 11
4.4.2 Ecotoxicology .................................................................................................. 12
4.4.3 Psychology ....................................................................................................... 12
5 Surveys, thematic monitoring and prospecting.................................................... 13
5.1 Surveying............................................................................................................ 13
5.1.1 Topographical surveying ................................................................................. 13
5.1.2 Geological surveying ....................................................................................... 13
5.2 Monitoring ......................................................................................................... 13
5.2.1 Contaminants ................................................................................................... 13
5.2.2 Climate monitoring .......................................................................................... 14
5.2.3 Monitoring of marine living resources ............................................................ 14
5.3 Bioprospecting ................................................................................................... 15
6 Implementation ....................................................................................................... 15
6.1 National co-operation ........................................................................................ 15
6.2 International co-operation ................................................................................. 15
6.3 Recruitment ........................................................................................................ 16
6.4 Technology demands and development ............................................................. 16
6.5 Environmental monitoring ................................................................................. 17
6.6 Financial implications ....................................................................................... 17
6.7 Dissemination .................................................................................................... 18
1
Preface
Skrives senere
Executive summary
Skrives senere
1 Introduction
Norway has a long history of whaling, exploration, scientific activity and surveying in
the Antarctic. Such activities motivated Norway’s annexation of Bouvetøya in 1930,
Peter I Øy in 1931 and Dronning Maud Land in 1939. Paralleling these territorial
claims, Norway has played an important role in antarctic co-operation, through longterm research and active participation in the development of the international legal
framework concerning the management of Antarctica. Two of the post-war milestones
in Norway’s antarctic research were the Maudheim expedition (1949-1951), which
was a joint Norwegian-British-Swedish expedition that spent two winters in Dronning
Maud Land, and the establishment of the “Norway Station” in Dronning Maud Land.
This station was manned in the period 1956-1960 in support of the International
Geophysical Year (IGY).
Following a 15-year hiatus, during which Norwegian activity was restricted to
participation on expeditions organised by other nations, the first Norwegian Antarctic
Research Expedition (NARE) took place in the austral summer 1976/77. Three more
NAREs followed in 1978/1979, 1984/1985 and 1989/90. The Troll Station, erected at
Jutulsessen in Gjelsvikfjella in Dronning Maud Land in the austral summer 1989/90,
was the first Norwegian base established in Antarctica since the “Norway Station”.
The first Nordic Antarctic Expedition was organised in 1991/92 by Finland, following
an agreement between Norway, Sweden and Finland that committed each nation to
organise an expedition every third year. Nordic expeditions were subsequently
organised every year, with the exception of the austral summers 1994/95 and 1998/99.
Norway was in charge of the Nordic collaboration via expeditions in 1992/93,
1996/97 and 2000/01. Since then, the Nordic collaboration has benefited from
intercontinental flights between South Africa and Dronning Maud Land. Moreover,
the Nordic collaboration has been organised such that each country has the logistical
responsibility for two consecutive seasons.
In 1993, the Research Council of Norway established the Norwegian National
Committee on Polar Research as a direct result of Parliamentary Report No. 42
“Norsk Polarforskning” (“Norwegian Polar Research”). Under the auspices of the
Research Council of Norway, the National Committee on Polar Research develops
science plans for Norwegian polar research, both in the Arctic and in Antarctica. The
present plan, which covers the 5-year period 2005-2009, will replace the existing
strategic plan for Norwegian antarctic research.
2
In this plan antarctic research is defined as research conducted on material and
phenomena in the Antarctic or research of immediate relevance for the Antarctic.
Antarctic research is not a single discipline, but part of the research effort in the
respective scientific disciplines. In the present plan the Antarctic region is defined as
areas from the South Pole to the Antarctic Convergence, including the Norwegian
claim areas Dronning Maud Land, Bouvetøya and Peter I Øy.
This new plan follows several of the research priorities identified in the previous
national antarctic research plan. There are, however, two new major logistical
developments that will impact Norwegian research in Antarctica : (i) initiation of
intercontinental flights between South Africa and Dronning Maud Land, making the
logistics for terrestrial and marine research activities independent of each other. This
makes both the geographical flexibility for marine research and for terrestrial research
in Dronning Maud Land in terms of duration and timing, greater. Furthermore (ii),
upgrading of the Troll Station makes possible year-round research and monitoring at
the station and in its vicinity
2 Vision
Norway will make a significant contribution to antarctic research in the period
2005-2009 with special focus on understanding the fundamental processes in
antarctic environments in relation to environmental variability and human impact.
3 Rationale
Norway has as a claimant state played an important role in antarctic co-operation,
through long-term research and active participation in the development of the
international legal framework concerning the management of Antarctica. Norway has
signed a series of agreements that have been adopted under the Antarctic Treaty
regime. The Environmental Protocol, a supplement to the Antarctic Treaty, is an
instrument designed to protect the antarctic environment and dependent and
associated ecosystems. Under this Protocol, Antarctica will, in effect, be a nature
reserve devoted to peace and science indefinitely. These commitments have been and
will still be important framework for scientific activities in Norwegian antarctic
research.
Norway has, as a claimant state in the Antarctic, a responsibility for scientific based
management of the natural resources. Norwegian research activities will be the
fundament for the management of the natural resources in Norwegian antarctic
territories.
Norway is entering a new era in terms of logistics in Antarctica, through the
establishment of a blue-ice runway at the research station Troll in Dronning Maud
land, and through an upgrade of Troll to winter-activity status from 2005. This new
logistic facilities open for a decoupling of the former traditional joint marine and
3
terrestrial activities, which was characterised by rather strong logistic constraints on
the scientific programmes of previous expeditions.
This brings a number of advantages for terrestrial research, such as less travel time,
the potential for longer and more flexible research seasons (possibility of shorter field
periods and exchange of personnel in the course of the season) and lower costs. In the
long term, the runway might act as a gateway to Antarctica, enhancing the
international activity and scientific collaboration in this part of Dronning Maud Land.
The base creates the potential for year-round research and monitoring, and the
possibility for scientists and students to spend the austral winter in Antarctica for data
collection and analyses.
The logistic decoupling opens for more flexible solutions for the marine activities by
joining the increasing number of larger international expeditions in addition to
national and Nordic expeditions, as well as participating on various types of
commercial marine platforms (fishing and tourist vessels) in the region. A
consequence is less restrictions in choice of geographical research areas and more
time available for marine scientists
New generations of climate and ecosystem models and new advanced remote sensing
techniques has opened for a new approach to antarctic science with less dependence
on field activities. Models can be developed to integrate existing and new multidisciplinary knowledge and data from physics to upper trophic levels into a system for
assessing the present and future states of the marine ecosystem as a function of the
main driving forces on the system. Thus, important studies of the Antarctic natural
environment can be carried out remotely and antarctic research has to be considered
as an activity independent of regular field expeditions to the area
Traditionally, the Norwegian research in the Antarctic has been disciplinary
orientated towards biology, geology, oceanography and glaciology. In the future a
cross-coupling of these disciplines towards an enhanced and increased understanding
of the antarctic environment within a global context will be necessary. In the Arctic,
Norway has several world leading research groups within interdisciplinary work.
These groups have a potential for making significant contribution to antarctic science.
In this way a bipolar approach with strong emphasis on studies between the Arctic
and the Antarctic is an advantage for Norwegian antarctic research. Research on
biogeochemical cycles, habitats, biotic adaptations to extreme environments,
thermohaline circulation, sea-ice variability, palaeoclimatology, ozone/UV radiation
and cultural heritage all are examples of beneficial transfer of knowledge between
arctic and antarctic research. Consequently, the present plan recognises that
Norwegian polar expertise can be more fully utilised by carrying out bipolar
comparative studies.
Management and conservation of the antarctic environment and exploitation of
natural resources are important tasks for the international society. This requires basic
knowledge in a broad range of natural as well as social sciences. Legal and political
aspects regarding Norwegian commitments to the Antarctic Treaty also require
substantial contribution from the scientific community.
4
4 Objectives and scientific priorities
The Antarctic provides a broad range of natural scientific challenges, and many
fundamental processes are poorly known. Norway as a small nation, has not the
possibility to cover all research areas, but has to concentrate in areas where we can
make significant contribution to progress in antarctic science and providing reliable
information for management of Norwegian claimant areas.
On this basis, scientific priorities for the period 2005-2009 will focus on research on
climate dynamics –past, present and future, marine ecosystems and the human
dimension. In addition, increased focus will be given to surveys and long-term
monitoring.
4.1 Climate dynamics
The ocean, sea ice, land ice and the atmosphere of Antarctica, most likely play a
critical role in the global climate system. The specific role of each element has
changed through geological time. Basic information of each element and their
interactions in geological time are stored in ice and sediment records. Climate models
can be verified through analysing past records. For understanding climatic processes
and explaining the role of the Antarctic in the global climate system, it is necessary to
use rigorous modelling and cross-coupling between various disciplines. .
Within this context, emphasis is given to the following research topics: Climatic
models, paleoclimate, Antarctic ice sheets and ocean circulation.
4.1.1 Climatic models
Important research areas will be
 to focus on improving model parameterisation through validation studies,
especially aiming at improving Global Circulation Models (GCMs).
The interactions between the different components of the climate system are nonlinear. The resulting complexity and sensitivity to different climate forcings present a
major challenge to climatologists. Understanding the variability in Antarctic climate
requires the synthesis of many observations of the atmosphere, ocean and sea ice.
Essentially, the major physical processes and the coupling between the different
components should be understood in order to construct global and regional climate
models, which are important tools for predicting how the climate will evolve over the
next centuries. Global circulation models (GCMs) are considered important tools for
assessment of the impact of anthropogenic release of CO2 and other greenhouse gases.
In this context, modelling of the Southern Ocean is one of the major tasks. Because of
extremely low vertical stability of the water column, different models produce huge
differences in rates of vertical mixing and transport of nutrients as well as estimates of
exchange with the atmosphere of heat and gases such as CO2. In order to improve the
GCMs, more field observations are needed in the Southern Ocean. Norwegian
researchers should, in close collaboration with climate modellers, focus on improving
model parameterisation through validation studies, especially aiming at improving
GCMs.
5
The energy transfer between the atmosphere and the ocean is critically dependent on
the extent of the sea-ice cover. Both the radiation balance and the transfer of heat and
momentum are quite different in ice-covered regimes compared to the open ocean.
Changes in the extent of sea-ice are particularly important because they generate a
strong positive climate feedback by affecting the surface albedo. Thus, improving the
parameterisation of sea-ice albedo in GCMs should be given priority. Variation in
albedo can be studied using remote sensing from satellites. Even so, ground truth
measurements are essential for validation. Satellite radar and laser altimeter
technology could provide useful tools for estimating sea-ice thickness in the future. In
this field of research bi-polar studies are particularly relevant.
4.1.2 Paleoclimate
Important research areas will be:
 the long term variability of the antarctic ice sheet
 studies of synchrony and leads and lags between the Northern and Southern
Hemispheres during periods of climate change
The Antarctic ice sheet has fluctuated considerably during the past ~35 million years
and has been one of the major driving forces for changes in global sea levels and
climate throughout the Cenozoic era. Determination of the scale and rapidity of the
response of these large ice masses to climatic forcing is of vital importance, especially
how fluctuations in the size and thickness of the ice sheet have affected sedimentation
on the continental margin, the formation of antarctic deep bottom water, and the
circulation in the oceans. The thick sediment layers accumulated on the continental
margin and in sediments around Antarctica hold important climatic records and future
Norwegian activity should prioritize sampling (coring and drilling) and analysing this
climatic archive with special emphasis for the long term variability of the antarctic ice
sheet.
Within the European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica (EPICA), ice that is almost
one million years old has been retrieved from Dome Concordia. In Dronning Maud
Land (DML), where the ice is less thick and the accumulation rates higher, the goal is
to retrieve ice that reaches back through the last (Eemian) interglacial period. A
crucial issue is to determine inter-hemispheric coupling, for example whether
Southern Ocean climate regimes have experienced the same type of rapid, frequent
changes as the Northern Hemisphere. Essential is also studies of synchrony and leads
and lags between the Northern and Southern Hemispheres during periods of climate
change. An ice core from the EPICA DML provides an essential source of
information for this type of studies. Additional important information about the interhemispheric climatic coupling is also to be found in the marine sedimentary archive.
Future Norwegian research should primarily explore the combined information from
ice and marine sediment cores. Focus should be given to glacial/interglacial
fluctuations. Special focus should also be given to the later part of the Holocene (<
2000 years).
4.1.3 The Antarctic ice sheet
Important research areas will be
6

to understand how the ice sheet, ice streams and ice shelves respond to climate
variability
Historically, research has focused largely on analysis of ice cores to explore past
climate changes. In the future, studies of change in mass balance and ice dynamics
have to be emphasised in order to predict the future evolution of the antarctic ice
sheet. Jutulstraumen is one of the largest antarctic ice streams. Interdisciplinary
research (glaciology, oceanography) should be conducted with a focus on melt/freeze
processes underneath the Fimbulisen ice shelf. Understanding how the interactions
between the ice shelf and the ocean modify water masses in the Antarctic Coastal
Current is essential for understanding global change.
It is generally accepted that the antarctic ice sheet consists largely of accumulation
zones, thus its mass balance is positive. In some areas near the margin, however, blueice areas exist that are characterised by negative mass balance and possible meltrelated features. Recent changes on the Antarctic Peninsula demonstrate that melting
at the surface can be an important trigger for larger changes, such as the disintegration
of ice shelves. It is therefore important to study surface and sub-surface melting in
Dronning Maud Land using in situ and satellite data as well as model simulation. This
work should be continued in order to understand the consequences of increased
melting at the surface on the energy balance, both at regional and continental scales.
4.1.4 Ocean circulation
Important research areas will be to
 understand the thermohaline circulation and its role in climate contexts
 increase the general knowledge of the Southern Ocean circulation and related
processes
The thermohaline circulation (THC) is a global ocean circulation. It is driven by
differences in the density of the sea water produced by temperature (thermal) and
salinity (haline) effects. The driving force for the THC is water mass formation.
Formation of sea ice over shallow continental shelves in the southern Weddell Sea
releases high-salinity brine, and this cold, saline water contributes directly to deepwater formation. An important challenge for antarctic science will be to understand
the sub ice-shelf circulation and the fate of the super-cooled and brine enriched watermasses. This is important, because it is uncertain how the antarctic ice shelves will
respond to the predicted warmer climates of the future. Thus, processes on the
continental shelf as well as below the floating glacier should be studied further, both
by means of field measurements and modelling. Monitoring super-cooled water is
particularly important.
The Antarctic Circumpolar Current is by far the world’s largest current, by a factor of
3-4 in terms of volume transport compared to the North Atlantic Current (Gulf
Stream). It effectively isolates the Southern Ocean from the rest of the world ocean.
Being circumpolar, it provides the link between the deep basins of the Atlantic, Indian
and Pacific oceans. Key transects for long-term monitoring of ocean properties
should be considered. However, such transects are very resource-demanding, thus
international co-operation should be stimulated. The importance of long-term timeseries is emphasised by climatologists working with global climate models. The
7
Southern Ocean can provide baseline values for radioactive isotopes due to (what are
assumed to be) limited amounts of atmospheric fallout and transport by the ocean. Their distribution might reveal water transport routes and hence, studies of radioactive
isotopes in the Southern Ocean should be established.
The release of brine that accompanies formation of sea ice is important with respect to
deep-water production, deep-sea oxygenation, uptake of anthropogenic CO2 by the
ocean, and the impact on seawater biogeochemistry, in polar regions. Comparative bipolar studies are particularly important because freezing in the Southern Ocean and
the arctic seas often occurs in different climatic regimes.
At times, polynyas develop in ice-covered areas; the Weddell Sea Polynya is a wellknown example. It occurred in the 1970s near the Maud Rise, where it produced a
major climate signal in Weddell Sea Deep Water. Such polynyas can be identified
using remote sensing. Carefully designed experiments including both in situ
measurements and modelling are required in order to describe the structure of
polynyas and to understand the physics that underlies their formation.
4.2 Marine ecosystems
4.2.1 The carbon cycle
Important research areas will be
 to study of the role of iron and other trace metals for understanding the
interaction between DOC and metals
 to study the deep water production and vertical export of carbon
 comparative studies of the regulations of algae, zooplankton and microheterotroph production in the Southern Ocean and the high-arctic seas
The oceanic carbon cycle is comprised of a physical pump, a biological pump and an
alkalinity or anion pump. The physical pump is driven by physical and chemical
processes, while the biological pump is driven by primary production, consuming
dissolved CO2 through photosynthesis and producing particulate organic carbon
(POC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The alkalinity pump is related to the
removal of carbon by calcification in the upper layer and the release of carbon when
calcium carbonate is dissolved at depth.
Changes in dense water production and the thermohaline circulation will impact the
ocean carbon reservoir. The global ocean stores roughly fifty times as much carbon as
the atmosphere, mostly in the deep waters of the Pacific Ocean because of its volume
and long residence time. Slowing or stopping the THC would make the Atlantic
Circulation more like that of the Pacific, increasing its carbon storage and thus
weakening the greenhouse effect and cooling the atmosphere – a negative feedback.
The balance of greenhouse gases, their sources and sinks has a well-known impact on
climate yet little is known about the antarctic reservoir. This is made all the more
important through positive feedback mechanisms. Carbon can be sequestered by both
physical and biological processes, and can be released by ocean mixing events; these
8
rates and reservoir sizes require better estimates for incorporation into coupled global
circulation models (GCMs).
Like the atlantic sub-arctic and the arctic seas, the Southern Ocean is an important
carbon sink. Yet biological pumping in the Southern Ocean is small judged from the
ambient concentrations of nitrate, phosphate, and silicate, which are the highest
anywhere in the upper levels of the world ocean. This is a consequence of low levels
of primary production in the ice-free parts of the Southern Ocean. This seems to be a
consequence of strong iron and grazing control or, in periods, light limitation (socalled HNLC or High-Nitrate-Low Chlorophyll water), as first suggested by
Norwegian scientists in 1929-1935 and verified through field experiments since 1989.
Norwegian carbon cycle research should be co-ordinated with studies of deep-water
production and vertical export of carbon and otherwise focus on the upward transport
of nutrients and the regulation of primary production and production of microheterotrophs by physics, sea-ice, nutrients and grazing. Studies of the role of iron and
other trace metals are essential for understanding the interaction between DOC and
metals, which makes the latter more bio-available while at the same time producing
free radicals and superoxides that, in combination with natural UV radiation, can be
harmful. The regulation of algae, zooplankton and micro-heterotrophs associated with
sea ice and ice-filled water in the Southern Ocean and the high-arctic seas should be
compared with the regulation of the corresponding communities in HNLC waters.
This will increase the understanding of “ordinary” nutrient limitation (nitrate,
phosphate; silicate in the case of diatoms) in ice-filled waters as opposed to iron
control in HNLC waters.
Norway has an advantage by possessing top expertise in modelling and the physical,
chemical and biological aspects of oceanography that deal with carbon pumping and
the ecology and adaptations of marine life to global change. Considering that in this
context, crucial ecological processes are little known, Norwegian researchers, in
addition to biological and chemical sampling of the upper ocean layer, should carry
out shipboard and laboratory experiments on the regulation of primary and secondary
production, and the dynamics of the micro-heterotrophs. The results should be input
to ecosystem studies and models of the impact of global change on cold-water
organisms.
4.2.2 Ecosystem studies
Important research areas will be
 to understand the physical, chemical and biological processes in the marine
ecosystem
 to understand and quantify human impact on the marine ecosystem, including
the living marine resources
 to quantify the biomass of marine resources and understand population
controlling mechanisms
 Comparative studies of ecosystem behaviour in the Southern Ocean and the
high-arctic seas
 to develop ecosystem modelling for better understanding of key processes
9
Norway has significant expertise in abundance estimation, physiological studies of
adaptation and general marine ecology and modelling. This largely arctic-based
expertise could be usefully applied to scientific studies of marine fauna in southern
polar regions.
So far, most of the biological research has focussed on seabirds and marine mammals.
Population dynamics, physiological and eco-toxicological research in order to
improve our understanding of how natural and anthropogenic changes in the
environment effect abundance and both spatial and temporal distribution of organisms
should be continued. Norway should focus on and participate in relevant research
with methodological expertise, for instance in acoustics and quantification of the
interactions between important predator and prey stocks. Research involving state-ofthe-art methods can link and quantify changes in the distribution, life history strategy,
demography, and population dynamics of seabirds, penguins and seals to climate
variability.
A research and monitoring programme should build upon the fact that seabirds and
marine mammals are excellent sentinels of environmental change in marine systems.
The system concentrates on key ecosystem elements that are broadly geographically
distributed and logistically feasible to work with, so that value gained by comparative
studies around Antarctic are maximized.
Rather little is known about the krill and particularly fish resources in the waters
surrounding Bouvetøya and the sea off Dronning Maud Land. CCAMLR has
encouraged and asked for investigations of these resources. Norway has for the first
time participated in the fishery for toothfish in January-March 2004. There is an
increasing interest from Norwegian vessels to participate in this highly profitable
fishery. Management of fisheries should be made on a scientific basis.. Norway
should therefore more actively take part in research related to quantifying the biomass
of marine resources and understand population controlling mechanisms, and to
increase basic knowledge about ecosystem interactions and species adaptations.
Comparative studies between the marine ecosystem in the Southern Ocean and the
arctic ecosystem should be emphasized.
Norwegian-South African expeditions have conducted monitoring activities and
scientific research on fur seals, penguins and a variety of other seabird species
resident on the Bouvetøya during the last 2 decades. This sub-antarctic island is
extremely interesting for a variety of reasons - it is distant from other land, is located
just south of the convergence and it has recently undergone significant changes in its
fauna. The fur seal population has increased dramatically over the past few decades,
and it appears that elephant seals may have recently started breeding on the island.
A goal for antarctic ecosystem modelling should be to improve our understanding of
the ecosystem dynamics and to apply this in an ecological approach towards future
demands to management advice based on precautionary principles. Through national
and international cooperation, a model based system for describing and quantifying
the various levels and interactions of ecosystem related to commercially exploitable
stocks of krill and fish stocks should be developed. This includes further development
10
of methodology and technology to measure the state variables in the ecosystem and to
estimate the standing and future stock size and distribution.
4.3 Humans in the Antarctic
Important research areas will be:
 Contributing research to the national governance of Dronning Maud Land and
to Norway’s international commitments and opportunities
 Tourism
 Cultural heritage research
The principal legal and the social science issues that concern Norway are related to
the evolution of the Antarctic Treaty System. The Protocol for Environmental
Protection (1991) is seen as particularly important. The establishment of a permanent
secretariat in 2004 for the Antarctic Treaty System may generate additional research
needs and priorities. Research related to the definition of extent of the continental
shelves associated with the Norwegian territories is needed. There are also research
challenges related to multinational management of antarctic resources. Ownership to
genetic resources may be an important future issue related to bioprospecting.
With increasing tourism, recently also involving Norwegian tour operators, it is
important to analyse trends in the regulations that govern antarctic tourism, the rules
for liability in the case of environmental damage, and the methods that are used for
analysis of environmental impact, and cumulative impacts.
Norwegian cultural artefacts in the Antarctic are mainly relics from the era of whaling
and geographical exploration. Most of them are situated on the sub-Antarctic islands
(South Georgia in particular) and on the Antarctic Peninsula, that is, far from
Dronning Maud Land. Thus, cultural history investigations and the establishment of
effective regulations for the protection and management of Norway’s cultural heritage
should primarily be based on international co-operation and by supporting Norwegian
participation in the expeditions of other countries.
4.4 Other research themes
Other research themes of relevance for Norwegian Research in the Antarctic are listed
below.
4.4.1 Atmosphere
Important research areas will be:
 Ozone layer depletion and the effects of solar ultraviolet radiation in the
Antarctic
 (Bi-polar comparative studies of the upper atmosphere?)
It is now widely accepted that a reduction in stratospheric ozone is linked to increases
in solar ultraviolet B radiation (UVB). The most striking example of this is the large
ozone hole that appears annually over the Southern Polar Region. However, available
11
data indicate that, over the past 10-15 years, UVB levels have increased significantly
at mid-latitudes in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Thus, ozone layer
depletion, and concomitant increases in UVB, are world-wide phenomena that are
inextricably linked to global climatic change. Following from this, intense scientific
research on both ozone layer depletion, and on the biological and ecosystem-level
impacts of UV radiation, is warranted.
Even at current levels, UVB radiation is harmful to aquatic organisms and may reduce
the productivity of marine ecosystems. Most UVB radiation research examines direct
effects on specific organisms. The few studies that have investigated indirect effects
demonstrate that UVB-induced changes in food-chain interactions can be far more
significant than direct effects on individual organisms at any single trophic level.
Norwegian research on UV radiation impacts in the Antarctic should focus on areas
for which our knowledge remains inadequate; that is, indirect (ecosystem-level)
effects. Specifically, the possibility that a UV-induced alteration in the nutritional
quality of the food base is transmitted up through the food web to herbivorous
zooplankton and fish larvae, and that this effect is temperature dependent, should be
evaluated.
4.4.2 Ecotoxicology
Important research areas will be:
 Bipolar studies of environmental contaminants in biota
Ecotoxicology is not given high priority as a research topic in the present plan, but
here would be interesting opportunities for bipolar studies in this field. The levels of
contaminants in antarctic biota is generally low, but some substances, such as Mirex,
are found in higher concentrations in antarctic top predators than in the Arctic.
Concentrations in organisms of different contaminants are often correlated, and it is
difficult to determine what substances are the most toxic. Thus, because of different
compositions of environmental contaminants in arctic and antarctic biota, bipolar
studies would be particularly useful to determine the most toxic components.
Because of the low level of most contaminants in Antarctica, the main focus of the
Norwegian activity should rather be on monitoring than research on effects of
contaminants.
4.4.3 Psychology
Research on health-based selection of crew for long-term stays on the Antarctic
Continent is being conducted by several nations. Norwegian over-wintering personnel
are too few in number to form a sound statistical base for behavioural or physiological
analyses and thus Norway should continue to participate in the international research
that has already begun, with follow-up of over-wintering personnel.
12
5 Surveys, thematic monitoring and prospecting
5.1 Surveying
Norway recognises the inadequate basic knowledge of topographical and thematic
data in Antarctica, and has a responsibility for surveying in the Norwegian claimant
areas. This work has to be coordinated with other nations surveying activities.
5.1.1 Topographical surveying
Norway has a commitment both to topographic and thematic surveying of Dronning
Maud Land, for which the Norwegian Polar Institute is the national mapping
authority. Topographical and geological mapping should continue in close
collaboration with the other countries that carry out research and monitoring in
Dronning Maud Land (e.g. Germany, Japan, and South Africa). Determination of the
geoid is of crucial importance for navigation.
5.1.2 Geological surveying
Basic geological surveying should focus on covering those areas of Dronning Maud
Land that are not surveyed by other countries. In addition, basic geological
investigations of the mountain range in Dronning Maud Land should be performed so
as to reveal the geological history of that area. The geological research in Dronning
Maud Land should also focus on geochronology and petrology as well as structural
studies.
5.2 Monitoring
Antarctica is still considered as a pristine continent and therefore gives a unique
opportunity to monitor contaminant levels of atmosphere, terrestrial and ocean
compartments. Monitoring of climate variables is important for study of the role of
Antarctica in the global climate system context.
The new Troll Station offers great potential for establishing atmospheric monitoring
programmes that could enable comparisons between Arctic and Antarctica.
5.2.1 Contaminants
Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and heavy metals in atmosphere and ice are
monitored in Norwegian arctic areas. Similar contaminant measurements could be
established at the Troll Station. In addition, measurements of climate-related gases,
and particles would be of interest. Moreover, measurements of ozone and UVradiation at the Troll Station would contribute a valuable supplement to measurements
carried out at other stations. It is advisable that establishment of future Norwegian
monitoring programmes is co-ordinated with ongoing international programs.
13
A concern during the last decades has been the accumulation of man-made harmful
chemical compounds in virtually all ecosystems. An important group of pollutants in
Antarctica are POPs which because of their large affinity to lipids, accumulate in the
fatty tissue of living organisms and are concentrated upwards in the food web,
reaching maximum concentration in the fatty tissue of top predators. However, levels
of contaminants in Antarctic biota are generally low compared to other parts of the
world.
5.2.2 Climate monitoring
Initiation of standard meteorological measurements at Troll will add significantly to
the coverage of the existing rather broad-scale regional distribution of sites for longterm meteorological observations.
A number of long-term glaciological measurements could be established on the Troll
area to study mass balance, superimposed ice formation, sub-surface melt water
production, palaeoclimatology (ice coring), surface energy balance and glacier
dynamics. These data should be related to information obtained by remote sensing.
A few key locations have been identified as extremely useful for assessing long-term
variability of ocean circulation under the ice shelf and formation of bottom water and
are considered to be useful as sites for continuous monitoring. Strategic placed
hydrographic sections should be established for ocean climate monitoring.
A permanent manned station at Troll opens up the possibilities of establishing a High
Resolution Picture Transmission (HRPT) station there for reception of satellite data
from meteorological polar orbiting satellites. Such as facility is expected to attract
considerable international interest, particularly to the meteorological service and other
relevant entities in South Africa. A HRPT-station would also offer new opportunities
for carrying out research projects and experiments in Antarctica.
Reception of all satellite images covering the area would improve the monitoring of
local weather conditions. Monitoring and collection of data from research stations and
platforms equipped with Argos transmitters would also be facilitated. A HRPT station
would also provide possibilities for reception of Advanced TIROS Operational
Vertical Sounder (ATOVS) data from the South Atlantic Ocean, which would also be
of interest for the international meteorological community. The establishment of
advanced data communication facilities at Troll will make it possible to transmit
relevant data to users in Norway and in other parts of the world.
5.2.3 Monitoring of marine living resources
Norway has a commitment to the Committee on Conservation of Antarctic Marine
Living Resources (CCAMLR), especially its Environmental Monitoring Programme
(CEMP). This programme focuses on identifying significant changes occurring in the
Southern Ocean ecosystem and on distinguishing changes due to the harvesting of
natural resources from those that can be ascribed to natural causes. The access of top
predators to krill is of particular interest to CEMP, and several species of seabirds and
marine mammals have been identified and are subject to monitoring with this respect.
14
Norway participates in CEMP by monitoring of fur seal and penguin colonies at
Bouvetøya. The Bouvetøya station bridges a significant gap in the global research
community’s co-operative monitoring of the sub-antarctic islands. Although the
establishment of an airstrip and the upgrade of the Troll Station in Dronning Maud
Land open the possibility for monitoring of its avifauna, research rather than
monitoring should be emphasised under the present science plan.
5.3 Bioprospecting
Bioprospecting in the Antarctic may be of potential commercial importance. Antarctic
organisms are adapted to cold environments and possess genetic and biochemical
features that might be exploited commercially by the development of products such as
industrial chemicals, drugs and genetic components. Internationally, there is now a
considerable focus on mapping of genetic resources of polar organisms. In
comparison with other countries, Norway’s research effort in bioprospecting is
limited, but in the last few years there has been an increased focus in this field. An
effort in bioprospecting in Antarctica may result in significant value creation for
Norwegian industry.
6 Implementation
This chapter focuses on national and international cooperation, recdruitment,
technology development, financing and dissemination.
6.1 National co-operation
The increased logistic flexibility onshore as well as offshore requires stronger national
co-ordination in order to achieve the strategic goals. The Norwegian Polar Institute
jointly with the Research Council of Norway should have the responsibility for this
co-ordination.
In order to realise this plan it is necessary to develop integrated national research
programmes. Improved logistic facilities open for a more regular activity and long
term funding. An important issue of the national co-ordination is to ensure a good
balance between efforts related to data acquisition and data processing.
6.2 International co-operation
The large challenges of antarctic research, both logistic and scientific, requires strong
international co-operation. This calls for increased co-operation between Norway and
other nations. The successful Nordic logistic co-operation should be further
developed. The Troll station represents a unique potential and opportunity for
increased scientific collaboration with the Nordic countries as well as other nations.
Research in the Arctic and the Antarctic are important areas of future cooperation
within the bilateral research cooperation between Norway and South-Africa. This
15
issue will include exchange of students and researchers between these two countries
utilising research facilities in Svalbard and Antarctica.
As a claimant state Norway should play a more active role in coordinating research in
the Dronning Maud Land and adjacent sea areas. Norway should also be more
proactive in development and steering of international antarctic research programmes
and should contribute more significantly in research activities in programmes of high
relevance for Norwegian research.
The Research Council Recommend that:
 Norway should play an active role in participation and development of
international research programmes.
 Norwegian scientist should be encouraged to coordinate and lead international
research activities.
6.3 Recruitment
There is a general need for recruitment within polar research. Following a period
during which soft money for young scientists working on Norwegian projects in
Antarctica has dwindled, adequate replacement must be ensured and, because of
expanded future activity, improved access to qualified scientific personnel. To cover
both immediate and future research needs in the next few years, during which many
scientists will retire, project grants should be allocated both for experienced and
young scientists; that is, for covering salaries and running expenses for researchers,
post-docs and doctoral students. To ensure future recruitment at the highest levels, it
is important to facilitate or stimulate to Master and PhD education in polar related
research. Training in antarctic research may give a broader scope for recruits to polar
research.
Norway offers opportunities for arctic education, research training and research at the
University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS). An active use of this resource for recruitment
to research in the Antarctic will give a good utilization of skilled expertise and may
also serve to strengthen bipolar research perspectives.
The Norwegian Polar Institute and the research training at The Bjerknes Centre for
Climate Research, a national Centre of Excellence with emphasis on climate change
in arctic regions, should be made use of for recruitment to projects in the Antarctica.
The same goes for institutes at the four Norwegian universities with engagement in
polar research.
Thus, the Research Council will contribute to:

Increased recruitment of Antarctic scientists both in the short and long-term
(from junior to senior levels)
6.4 Technology demands and development
16
Observations from satellites and ocean- and earth-based measuring instruments
integrated in model systems, act as the basis for state-of-the-art process studies and
environmental and climate monitoring. There is a demand for further development of
measuring technology for atmospheric, terrestrial and marine studies specially
adapted to polar regions. This type of new technology would potentially have a large
international commercial market. .
The Research Council will:
 Stimulate the application and development of new measurement technology
for use in the Antarctic
6.5 Environmental monitoring
The upgrade of Troll to an all-year station in Dronning Maud Land improves the
infrastructure basis for monitoring programmes related to climate change and
environmental pollution.
Long time-series are important for studies of climate end environmental changes, and
for the predictions of future changes. Implementation of long-term monitoring is often
difficult with regard to funding as this activity usually has been given low priority in
relevant research programmes etc.
The Research Council will:
 Contribute to establishment, maintenance and funding of long-term
monitoring series of physical, chemical and biological environmental data
as a fundament for monitoring and research of the environment and living
resources in the Antarctic.
6.6 Financial implications
We note that:

Norway must ensure recruitment to the polar sciences

The quality of antarctic marine research should be improved by ensuring
coherence between the different projects participating on Norwegian cruises,
thus ensuring maximal synergistic effects. Participation from other nations
should be welcomed when scientifically appropriate.

Terrestrial research in Antarctica should become more efficient and improved
by the new infrastructure that facilitates more flexible timing and duration of
expeditionary work; also the quality of research will be improved

Year-round presence at Troll Station enables the establishment of long-term
measurement programmes for crucial climate variables
17

Surveying and long-term environmental and biological monitoring are
important background activities for management of claimant territories.

Bi-polar research will significantly improve the cost/benefit ratio for
Norwegian polar science

Norway is now in the position to contribute significantly to international
multidisciplinary projects and networks
To take full advantage of these potentials, it is recommended that:

Funding for research projects should not be limited to today’s earmarked
NARE-funding from the Ministry of Environment. The Research Council of
Norway (RCN), for instance, should be prepared to fund antarctic research
though support from relevant Ministries. Additionally, RCN should stimulate
to increased international financial support.

Financial periods for research projects should be increased to up to 4 years.
Funding of post-expedition data analysis and modelling has to be
strengthened.

Funding for surveying and long-term monitoring activities should be secured
and be separated from funding of research projects.

The annual budget of Norwegian antarctic research, monitoring and logistics
need be substantially raised to fulfil the intentions of increased activities.
6.7 Dissemination
Continuous dissemination of results from the research activities to the scientific
community, authorities as well as the general public is a core objective of the
Research Council. Research projects with public funding should therefore include
plans for dissemination of their results. One challenge is to increase the public
awareness of Antarctica. Another is to implement scientific results in management
decisions for this region.
Recommendations:

Research projects and monitoring programmes should publish scientific results
in peer-reviewed journals. Projects fulfilling this criterion should be favoured
in the next call for proposals.

Project results should be made available to all stakeholders. Dedicated
dissemination should be made visible through a wide variety of channels, such
as newspapers, popular-science journals, radio, television, the Internet, and the
educational system (from elementary to university level), exhibitions,
newsletters etc.
18

Relevant scientific results should be communicated to authorities in order to
ensure an appropriate science-based management of the Antarctic.

A centralised Internet home page and database should be established for all
Norwegian antarctic activities and should be established and maintained, for
instance by The Norwegian Polar Institute (NPI). Principal investigators
should be required to provide updated regularly information to the database.
19