* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Holistic Coupled Field and Circuit Simulation - Humboldt
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
History of electromagnetic theory wikipedia , lookup
National Electrical Code wikipedia , lookup
Electricity wikipedia , lookup
Scanning SQUID microscope wikipedia , lookup
Maxwell's equations wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Residual-current device wikipedia , lookup
Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup
High voltage wikipedia , lookup
Induction heater wikipedia , lookup
Faraday paradox wikipedia , lookup
Earthing system wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetic compatibility wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical descriptions of the electromagnetic field wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetic field wikipedia , lookup
Electromotive force wikipedia , lookup
Holistic Coupled Field and Circuit Simulation Peter Meuris1 , Wim Schoenmaker1 , Christian Strohm2 , Caren Tischendorf2 1 Magwel NV, Leuven, Belgium 2 Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Dept. of Math., Germany {peter.meuris,wim.schoenmaker}@magwel.com {strohmch,tischendorf}@math.hu-berlin.de Circuit simulators used in semiconductor industry are based on lumped element models described in form of net lists. In order to be able to incorporate the mutual electromagnetic influence of neighboring elements (e.g. cross talking), one needs refined models. Here, we present a holistic simulation approach for lumped circuit models including 3D electromagnetic field models for specific devices. The electromagnetic (EM) fields are described by the full-wave Maxwell’s equations in potential formulation, see e.g. [1] ~ = − %, ~ + ∂t (ε∇ϕ + εΠ) ~ = J~ (1) ∇ · (ε∇ϕ + εΠ) ∇ × (ν∇ × A) ~ as well as the pseudo-canonical momentum with the scalar potential ϕ and the vector potential A ~ = ∂t A ~ to avoid the second-order time derivative. Performing the modified nodal analysis, we get Π for the circuit part the equation system d ~ (2) A1 d q(A> e, t) + A1 g(A> e, t) + A2~i2 = 0, φ(i2 , t) + r(~i2 , t) − A> e = 0, 1~ 1~ 2~ dt dt having only the nodal potentials e and the currents i2 of the voltage controlling elements as variables, see [2]. Here, the incidence matrix A = (A1 , A2 ) is split with respect to the current and voltage controlling elements. The system is completed by the boundary conditions ~ · n⊥ = 0, ~ + ∇ϕ) · nk = 0. (3) (∇ × A) (Π Denoting by Γk the k-th contact of the EM field element we get the current through Γk as Z h i ~ · n⊥ dσ. ~ (4) ik = J~ − ε∂t (∇ϕ + Π) Γk In contrast to [3], where a co-simulation approach is presented, we consider a holistic simulation approach with an adaptive time step control for the whole coupled system. The spatial discretization can be seen as a generalized finite-integration technique. Thus, (1) results in Z Z 2~ ~ − ε(∇ϕ + Π) · d S = % d3 v ∂∆Vi ∆Vi I I Z (5) h i 1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ · d2 S. ~ ν A · dl · dli = J~ − ε∂t (∇ϕ + Π) ∆S i ∂∆Si ∆Si ∂∆Si The joined field and circuit DAE (5)-(2) with couplings (3)-(4) is solved by BDF methods. Simulation results are presented for a circuit coupled with a novel industrial prototype balun device. Keywords: holistic, field, circuit, coupled simulation, Maxwell, semiconductor, balun Acknowledgments: This work is supported by the EU funded FP7 ICT project nanoCOPS GA619166. R EFERENCES [1] P. Meuris, W. Schoenmaker, and W. Magnus, “Strategy for electromagnetic interconnect modeling,” Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 753–762, Jun 2001. [2] D. Estévez Schwarz and C. Tischendorf, “Structural analysis of electric circuits and consequences for mna,” Internat. J. Circ. Theor. Appl., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 131–162, 2000. [3] S. Schöps, H. De Gersem, and A. Bartel, “A cosimulation framework for multirate time integration of field/circuit coupled problems,” Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 3233–3236, 2010.