Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
Lymphopoiesis wikipedia , lookup
Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Hospital-acquired infection wikipedia , lookup
Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup
Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup
Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup
Sjögren syndrome wikipedia , lookup
2016 DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE RESEARCH DAY Title of Poster: Evidence of Immunologic Dysfunction in Older Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Presenter: Joanna Schaenman Division: Infectious Diseases ☒ Faculty ☐ Fellow ☐ Resident ☐ Post-doc Research Fellow ☐ Graduate Student ☐ Medical Student ☐Other Principal Investigator/Mentor: Joanna Schaenman Co-Investigators: Emily Liang, Yael Korin, Tiffany Sidwell, Victoria Groysberg, Maura Rossetti, Gabriel Danovitch, Suphamai Bunnapradist, Phuong-Thu Pham, Edward Hunag, Erik Lum, Arun Karlamangla, Elaine Reed Thematic Poster Category: Atherosclerosis Infections, Injury and Repair, Inflammation, Host Defense, Immunology, Hemostasis and Abstract Background: The numbers of older patients with end stage organ disease requiring organ transplantation continues to grow as the population ages. However, older transplant recipients experience increased rates of infection and death as compared with younger patients. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from 20 older (≥age 60) and 34 matched younger (ages 30-59) kidney transplant recipients 3 months post-transplantation. Immunophenotyping was performed by multiparameter flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was by Kruskal-Wallis test (Jmp Pro 11); single asterisk indicates p<0.05, triple asterisk, p<0.001. Results: Older kidney transplant recipients had a lower frequency of naive CD4+ (19.1% versus 37.0% in younger patients, p=0.002) and naive CD8+ T cells (12.7% versus 38.3%, p<0.001). Older recipients demonstrated an increased frequency of effector memory (EM) CD8+ (33.3% versus 20.4%, p<0.001) and terminally differentiated CD8+ T cells (48.7% versus 29.1%, p=0.005). Strikingly, older recipients also displayed increased frequency of exhausted and senescent T cells, with increased frequency of CD57+ (30.1% versus 19.4%, p=0.02) and KLRG1+ CD8+ T cells (63.7% versus 36.3%, p<0.001) (see Figure). In terms of innate immunity, older patients displayed increased frequency of M1 classically activated monocytes (29.9% versus 17.8%, p=0.01) and fewer M2 alternatively activated monocytes (69.1% versus 81.0%, p=0.01). Conclusion: Compared to younger recipients, older kidney transplant recipients displayed decreased frequency of naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and increased frequency of EM, terminally differentiated, exhausted, and senescent CD8+ T cells, and pro-inflammatory M1 monocytes, suggesting a possible mechanism for increased vulnerability to infection in the older transplant recipient. Further studies will may lead to noninvasive techniques for patient monitoring, customization of immune suppression, and candidate selection based on better understanding of biologic, rather than chronologic, age.