Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Peer-to-peer lending wikipedia , lookup
Present value wikipedia , lookup
Financialization wikipedia , lookup
Payday loan wikipedia , lookup
Yield spread premium wikipedia , lookup
Syndicated loan wikipedia , lookup
Interest rate ceiling wikipedia , lookup
Annual percentage rate wikipedia , lookup
Persuasion in Household Finance: New Evidence, New Applications Jonathan Zinman Department of Economics Dartmouth College Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Consumer Protection Week Conference March 29, 2006 Plan for the Talk • Two new pieces of evidence showing that persuasion has strong effects on consumer borrowing decisions • Practical implications of this type of evidence – Sprinkled with related findings on savings decisions Study #1: What Psychology Worth? By: Bertrand-Karlan-Mullainathan-Shafir-Zinman • Researchers worked with large consumer lender in South Africa to send direct mail: – To former, experienced clients – With randomized interest rates • Very expensive (200% APR), short-term (4-month) loans • Market looks like a cross between payday loans and old small loan/finance company personal loan market – With randomized presentations of substantively identical offers…. What Drives Consumer Financial Decision-Making? • Say you got this letter…. what might drive whether you take a loan or not? – Economics says: price – Psychology says: price and lots of “contextual” factors • Mood (emotions) • Complexity of decision (so some presentations more effective/salient than others) • Firms often refer to this as “value-based” features So How Test Importance of Psychology in an Economic Decision? 1. Design marketing “features” that are based on “what works” in lab experiments in psychology 2. Lender randomly assigns these marketing features in direct mail 3. Measure impact of marketing on loan demand (takeup decision) Marketing Features Tested • Table size (information overload) • Comparison to competitor (gain-loss) • Photo (cue) – Race (mis)match – Gender (mis)match • Promotional giveaway (“congruence” frame) • Suggestions – Priming call – Loan use Findings: Marketing Treatments • Some “worked” (increased takeup), some didn’t • When work, marketing effects very large • On average, marketing effects very large – Effective marketing increases loan demand as much as a 20-30% drop in the interest rate • Effective marketing dulled price sensitivity Study #2: “Fuzzy Math” • Stango & Zinman project studying a particular, prevalent cognitive bias and its impacts on financial decisions & markets • Motivation…. do you ever wonder why “monthly payments” marketing is so prevalent? Marketing Payments, not (loan) prices • The more things change the more they stay the same…. The Denver Post March 12, 1980 La Prensa de Minnesota March 31-April 6, 2005. Our Explanation for this: “Payment/Interest Bias” • Give consumers all other loan terms but NOT the interest rate, and they systematically and dramatically UNDERESTIMATE the interest rate associated with a loan (offer)…. 1000 0 500 Frequency 1500 Stated Interest Rate 0 20 40 60 Mean=17, Median=18 80 100 600 400 0 200 Frequency 800 1000 Implied APR from Total Payments 0 20 40 60 Mean=57, Median=43 80 100 400 0 200 Frequency 600 800 Difference between Implied APR and Stated Rate 0 100 200 Mean=38, Median=25 300 Payment-Interest Bias: Facts • First documented in 1960s and 1970s – Early finding impetus for Truth-in-Lending • But largely ignored by social scientists since early 1980s – So most recent data is 1983 • Stango & Zinman first to systematically explore possible impacts of this bias on decision-making, the functioning of financial markets Payment-Interest Bias: Findings • Conditional on a rich set of household characteristics and/or loan characteristics, biased consumers are: – – – – Less likely to comparison shop for loans More likely to shop on non-price terms More likely to have financed a recent large purchase More likely to borrow from nonbank lenders (finance companies, retailers) – More likely to pay higher interest rates when borrowing from nonbank lenders • Some evidence that consumers are less price sensitive when borrowing from nonbank lenders – Less likely to have saved in the past year – And they have much less wealth Related Policy Issues • Disclosure • “Predatory Lending” • Our findings echo stylized facts: – Violations (still) prevalent, and incredibly so in our sample period (Fortney 1986) – Non-bank lenders much more likely to be prosecuted (GAO 2004) – These lenders use marketing techniques that highlight monthly payments and obscure true borrowing costs Practical Implications What do in light of this type of evidence? 1. Problems with Traditional Approaches: – Education – Information – Prohibition 2. New Approaches Problems with (Financial) Education • “Education” = teaching problem-solving skills • Decisions are complex • Biases are prevalent, may be deep – Lack of numeracy • E.g., payment-interest bias incredibly widespread – Lack of comfort with numbers, finance even among numerate • Key decisions are often low-frequency– little opportunity for learning-by-doing, reinforcement – Examples: car purchase (with loan), retirement plan Problems with Information-Provision • “Information” = disclosure, teaching decision heuristics • Problems: – “Information overload” – Resistance Problems with Prohibition • The usual economic costs, plus: • Underground markets may be even more “high-touch”, able to exploit biases New Research Suggests and Develops New Approaches 1. Product Presentation 2. Social Marketing 3. Product Development New Approaches to Product Presentation • Not fancy marketing, but…. • “Optimizing defaults”: – switching 401k defaults from “don’t participate” to “participate” has huge impacts on savings, even when there is a clear opt-out (Madrian and Shea; Laibson and co-authors) – showing a different example loan maturity has huge effect on maturity chosen (Karlan & Zinman 2005) • Concise is nice: beware of information overload – BKMSZ on loans – Iyengar et al on savings • Mental accounting and goal-setting (Karlan, Mullainathan, and Zinman ongoing) New Approaches: Social Marketing • Use marketing to spur more deliberate (better?) decisions – What’s good for the (rapacious corporate?) goose is good for the (benevolent?) gander • Examples: – Punam Keller on mammograms: appeal to family rather than self – Karlan-Mullainathan-Shafir-Zinman: designing marketing approaches to encourage saving New Approaches: Product Development • Can we stop consumers from borrowing too much? Don’t know yet. • But we can help them save more…. • Economists have developed 2 successful “commitment savings” products motivated by evidence from psych and econ: – SMART: Thaler and Benartzi (2004) – SEED: Ashraf, Karlan, and Yin (2006) New Approaches Require Process Innovation • Psychologically-driven interventions inherently require continued testing and fine-tuning – Lack of general psych theory – Importance of particular contexts • Sophisticated firms (credit card companies, Amazon) have recognized this, built randomized-control evaluation of pricing and marketing strategies into their day-to-day operations • Academics are now working in partnership with smaller firms, NGOs, and public agencies to bring these tools to the masses Closing Thought • Evaluate: – is what you (or your grantees) are doing effective? – do a “gold-standard” (randomized-control) evaluation whenever possible – get outside (academic) help • Innovate – again, collaborations w/researchers can be productive • Disseminate A Virtuous Cycle Evaluate Innovate Disseminate