Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
WG 22 Report, November 2008 During the year, Dr. Farman and Mr. Goyette (Co-Chairs of DICOM WG 22 – Dentistry) also attended various DICOM Working Groups to ensure the smooth passage of DICOM Supplement 123 – Structured Display. Harry Solomon was instrumental in editing the document. This supplement required interaction with DICOM WG 11 (Display Function Standard) and WG 6 (Base Standard). While the origins of the new supplement involved displaying full mouth radiographic series and similar series on the screen in a reproducible manner at the sender and recipient ends of a communication, this soon expanded to involve ophthalmology (DICOM WG 9), digital mammography (DICOM WG 15), clinical trials and education (DICOM WG 18) and cardiology (WG 1) among other disciplines. This Supplement passed through public comment, was readied for letter ballot at a DICOM WG 6 meeting attended by the ADA DICOM Alternate, Dr. Greg Zeller, It received approval through letter and was approved by DICOM WG 6. Final text will is anticipated before the end of 2008. As a Member of DICOM WG 24 (Surgery), Dr. Farman has been keeping an eye on three supplements originating from that group that affect Dentistry in that they affect all boneintegrated implants (orthopedic and dental). These are Draft Supplement 131 (Implant Templates), Draft Supplement 132 (Polygonal Segmentation Storage SOP Class) and Draft Supplement 134 (Implantation Plan SR Document). It is necessary for WG 22 to recruit more software vendors involved in dental implant planning to the task of ensuring the new Supplements when approved do adequately support the needs of Dentistry. Through ADA SCDI WG 12.1, that is used to interpret DICOM for dentists and to provide demonstrations, Technical Reports that are in advanced stages of development include ADA SCDI TR 1051 concerning DICOM use in larger dental clinics and institutions (public comment completed and now readied for letter ballot by ADA SCDI), ADA SCDI TR 1057 – guidelines for digital imaging and interoperability in dental practice (readied for public comment through ADA), and ADA SCDI TR 1059 – standardization in cephalometrics ( draft completed and approved by ADA SCDI WG 12.1 and awaiting further input from ADA SCDI WG 11.6 – orthodontic record – prior to forwarding for public comment). At the ADA Annual Session, the DICOM efforts at ADA SCDI were demonstrated by multiple users and vendors at a three booth wide “Interoperability” activity linked by a DICOM server (provided by Medicor/Lead Tools) to six active cone beam CT systems in the “Live Operatory” educational program. This interoperability activity continued throughout the three whole days of commercial exhibition. The concept of DICOM is also being addressed individually by DICOM WG 22 members through their roles as editors and authors. Support for SCDI activities has been made in an article and letter to the editor published in JADA in 2008 and also through other outlets including the widely accessed blog “Talking Pictures” in the DrBicuspid.com web page. A special session on DICOM and IHE was held at the Asian Congress on Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology in Nara, Japan in November 2008. DICOM was also discussed as part of a workshop on digital imaging delivered at the International Dental Federation (FDI) in Stockholm, September 2008. Allan G. Farman November 20, 2008