Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
“There is nothing either good or bad: but thinking makes it so.” Shakespeare 1564 – 1616 THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE Lesson 1 – What are ethics? ETHICS Area of Knowledge: Ethics “When people talk of knowledge, they often consider only 'factual' knowledge, like the knowledge we have discussed so far, of scientific or mathematical truths. However, I would also want to say that I know that murdering someone is wrong: I do not just feel or strongly believe this, I know it.” Kai Arste A True Story… Read the following story – one slide at a time. At the end of each slide make a decision about what should be done in the given situation. Also state what extra information you would need in order to make a good decision. A True Story… Brandishing a meat cleaver, Trisha Marshall burst into the apartment of a disabled man in his early sixties. She demanded money but the man, both of whose legs had been amputated, had been robbed before. Now he was prepared. He pulled out a gun and shot Marshall in the head. Then he called the police. …what should be done in the given situation? A True Story… This incident took place on the night of 19th April 1993 in North Oakland, across the bay from San Francisco. …what should be done in the given situation? A True Story… Two days later, Trisha Marshall, now in intensive care unit at Highland General Hospital, was declared brain dead. She was twenty-eight years old, and the mother of four children, all of them being cared for by other people. Berkeley police said that she was under investigation for several other robberies. She had cocaine and alcohol in her blood. She was also seventeen weeks pregnant. …what should be done in the given situation? A True Story… Although Marshall was brain dead, a respirator maintained her breathing, her heart was beating, her body was warm and her bodily functions were continuing. Her parents and her boyfriend came to the hospital. Her boyfriend said he was the father of the child. Both he and Marshall’s parents wanted the hospital to do everything possible to allow the baby to be born. …what should be done in the given situation? A True Story… Trisha Marshall’s treatment was discussed extensively by the ethics committee at Highlands Hospital. The committee tried to establish what she would have wanted, and it also tried to do what it thought to be in the best interest of the fetus. …what should be done in the given situation? A True Story… What it deliberately did not consider were the circumstances in which Marshall died, the fact that she had either not wanted to or had been able to care for her existing children and the cost of the intensive care required. …what should be done in the given situation? A True Story… The ethics committee agreed with the doctors that Marshall’s bodily functions should be maintained as long as possible, so that the fetus could have a chance of developing to a stage at which it could be born. …what should be done in the given situation? A True Story… When the decision became known, Highland General Hospital was criticized for what it was trying to do. The critics pointed out that, like most American public hospitals in run-down urban areas, Highland Hospital tries to care for the victims of crime, mental illness, AIDS, drug addiction and malnutrition, on a budget which is simply not adequate to the task. …what should be done in the given situation? A True Story… Maintaining Trisha Marshall’s pregnancy was estimated to cost $200,000, with at least an additional $200,000 needed for the care of the baby, who would be born prematurely. …what should be done in the given situation? A True Story… Dashka Slater, as journalist who covered the story, later wrote: “Nearly every telephone receptionist, desk clerk, cop or librarian who learned what I was working on had an opinion about the Marshall case, and that opinion could usually be summed up in one blunt statement: ‘What a waste of money!’” …what should be done in the given situation? Your Response… Your response to this and other such dilemmas will depend upon your values or moral principles you feel are important. These include: Integrity/honesty Loyalty Compassion Empathy Justice Generosity Ethical Theory Moral principles upon which decisions are made and actions taken. The Self-Interest Theory (Ethical Egoism) “Above all, look after yourself.” Altruism “The interests of others are more important than my interests.” Moral Duty “A man’s gotta do what a man’s gotta do.” Utilitarianism “The greatest happiness to the greatest number.” The Universal Theory “Do as you would be done by.” Another true story… Only four men survived the ship wreck Mignonette in 1884, floating for three weeks in the Atlantic in a life boat. On the 19th day, the captain Thomas Dudley suggested they draw lots to decide who would be killed and eaten, but one man objected. On the 20th day, Dudley told the others to look away, offered a prayer and cut the throat of the cabin boy, aged 17, who was sick from drinking seawater. They ate his body. Four days later they were rescued by another ship and the three survivors were charged with murder in the case The Queen vs. Dudley and Stephens. The Queen vs. Dudley and Stephens Examine this case from the different ethical perspectives/theories. What was the alternative if they acted in one of these ways? “There is no such thing as ‘right’, the very concept needs to be replaced with ‘progressively less wrong’.” Paul Grobstein Ethics & Reason In some senses, ethics are a lot like the arts; “it is just a matter of personal taste” It is also like the social sciences; “it is hard to experiment” However, there are some courses of action that are “morally better”, and in some cases our organisation or country needs to determine a course of action based on ethical principles This is where we need to use reason Ethics & Reason We need to ask the questions – Is there any evidence we can collect? Can our argument be supported/refuted by empirical enquiry? Are there any general principles that make our position morally repellent? Are there any general principles that make our position inconsistent with our other beliefs? Are all our premises sound? Exercise 1a – Which argument is better? Counselors should keep confidentiality… …Otherwise no one would go to them for help …Because it is a matter of people’s privacy Exercise 1b – Which argument is better? We should tax the wealthy more than the poor… …Because they are better able to afford it. …Because it is the best way of generating substantial government revenue. Exercise 1c – Which argument is better? Euthanasia should not be allowed… …Because families will pressure elderly or inconvenient relatives to opt for it when they would rather not. …Because the taking of a life is wrong, even if it is your own. Exercise 1d – Which argument is better? Euthanasia should be allowed… …Because we have the right to do what ever we want with our own bodies. …Because it is better to die than to live in misery. Exercise 1e – Which argument is better? Genetic engineering is immoral… …Because we aren’t meant to tamper with the basic machinery of life. …Because we would save far more lives by spending the billions currently spent on research on saving starving children in Africa. Exercise 1f – Which argument is better? Genetic engineering is moral… …Because God put us here to understand and marvel at his creation. …Because we can increase the quality of billions of lives in the future. Sterilisation Plans Read the BBC article ‘Charity offers UK drug addicts £200 to be sterilised’ about a project to encourage socially undesirable individuals to be sterilized. What are the ethical considerations of this plan? Is the way to improve society? Do you agree or disagree with this plan? Why? Next Lesson… Conventions vs. Moral Standards Ethics & Culture – The Golden Rule