Download The Theory of Anti-Relativity, Chapter 1

The Theory of Anti-Relativity
Chapter 1
Back to Space, or Why One Over The Speed of Light Squared.
In order to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the dimensional relations of
the magnetic inductance, and the electro-static capacitance it is necessary to turn again to
the metrical dimension of space. It is, however, this dimension of space has become
warped, as expressed in a N.F.G. It is in what follows found that the Faraday
understanding is in direct conflict with the Einstein understanding, the latter
extinguishing the former. Lines of induction have given way to relativistic concepts, fact
has succumbed to phantasy. This condition has a direct influence upon the conceptual
understanding of the conditions and dimensions that give rise to electrical inductivity as
expressed by the co-efficients of magnetic and dielectric fields known as “the
inductance” and “the capacitance”.
The concept of space, as given by Albert Einstein, constitutes a serious impediment to the
understanding of this metrical dimension. The salient constituent of the Einstein “Theory
of Relativity” is the Minkowski “Four-Space”. To quote Einstein “With out it the
General Theory of Relativity, etc., would of perhaps got no farther than its long cloths,”
“Relativity” by Albert Einstein, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey.
Minkowski proposed a fourth co-ordinate be compounded upon the three co-ordinate
(cubic) set of Descartes, “Cartesian” third order space. Einstein here accordingly
represents this fourth order space in “Gaussian” rather that “Cartesian” co-ordinates.
The fourth co-ordinate, or length, of space is derived as
(1) Velocity – Time
Since it is dimensionally
(2) Velocity, or Space per Time
Substituting (2) into (1) gives
(3) Space – Time per Time or Space – Numeric
Here derived is a fictitious space co-ordinate, a length, this given as a light second.
Hence
(4) Centimeter – Second per Second, or Centimeter
And
(5) Second per Second, or Numeric
Minkowski affixes a versor operator, the square root of negative one, to this numeric. It
has been shown that this versor can possess two distinct values, and hence two distinct
versor positions in time. Taking the light second as ct, where c is the luminal velocity,
and t is the time period, the versor gives the pair
(A) Positive jct, Light – Seconds
(B) Negative jct, Light – Seconds
This quadrature form implies four distinct time frames, however, Einstein ignores the
versor positions, retaining only one, jct. Einstein – Minkowski represents this as an illconceived space versor.
Einstein remarks here “Time is robbed of its independence”. Now time is married to the
velocity of light. Minkowski goes on to say, “Hence forth space by itself and time by
itself are doomed”. All are relative to the velocity of light. This is “The Theory of
Relativity.”
Here any development of a mathematics of space comes to a standstill. Space now is just
a factor of the velocity of light. It is instructive to reflect here upon the history of one
over the speed of light square. The dimensional relation is,
(6) Constant, or Second Square per Centimeter Square
One over c square finds an origin in the work of James Clerk Maxwell, 1831 to 1879.
Maxwell was a Scottish born natural philosopher. His work follows the trail of Ben
Franklin and Michael Faraday, thru the mathematics of Newton – Liebnitz. Here arose
the “Faraday – Maxwell” theory of electricity, the foundation of electrical understanding.
But does anyone understand it? I think not.
Maxwell, in his studies, had determined the existence of a distinct factor of
proportionality, this factor expressing a ratio of mechanical force exerted upon physical
matter thru dielectric actions, to mechanical force exerted upon physical matter thru
magnetic actions. This of course relates directly to our principle question at hand for the
quantum mechanics; the condition of equal and opposite forces between dielectricity and
magnetism. No answer yet.
It may be noted that Maxwell’s determination of this “proportionality factor” gave rise to
a NUMERIC value of one over c square. It is a faulty inference to assume this factor is
an actual velocity, or is the dimensional relation of a velocity at all. Here given it is
numeric. In the comparisons of optics and electrodynamics it is found that a dielectric
has the following characteristics;
(1) Refractive Index
(2) Dielectric Inductivity
(3) Luminal Velocity
All three of these relations are exactly related to the velocity of light. But here again is
one over c square and actual velocity?
Maxwell’s discovery of a factor of proportionality between dielectricity and magnetism
led to his theory of conjugate pair of inductions, dielectric and magnetic, in union,
propagating at the velocity of light thru the “Luminiferous Aether”. Hence, electromagnetic waves in free space, unbounded by gross physical matter, mass free energy.
This propagation is within the dielectric, or aetheric, medium itself. It is free of so-called
“charge carriers” (electrons), a mass-less form of electricity. This concept had a very
powerful impact upon the scientific and philosophical thoughts of Maxwell’s era. So
here begins the notion of “wireless”, the transmission of electricity without wires or other
guiding structures.
Leading up to the work of Heinrich Hertz, 1857 to 1894, the wireless transmission of
electricity had found experimental verification by Joseph Henry, and Elihu Thompson. It
even was patented by M. Loomis. See “Secrets of Cold War Technology” by Jerry
Vasillatos. These examples however were no electro-magnetic, they were electro-static
(dielectric). Heinrich Hertz provided the first complete laboratory demonstration of the
transmission of electricity thru “free space”, (across the room). This was instantly
considered proof of the Maxwell theory of electro-magnetism, and electro-magnetic
waves. When Nikola Tesla engaged in the experiments of Hertz, he found these waves
not to be completely electro-magnetic. The early death of Hertz prevented any further
progress. However “the world view” kept hold of its belief that “Hertzian” waves are
only transverse E. M. waves, the two distinctions now synonymous.
When Nikola Tesla undertook the development of his unique transmission transformers,
he soon found the velocity of light had no relation here. In his “Colorado Springs Notes”
experiment and calculation demonstrate that the propagation on his “extra coil” tends
toward 180 percent luminal velocity. See “Theory of Wireless Power”, by E. P. Dollard.
It is found that the extra coil propagation is not even in the dimension of velocity at all.
See “Transmission and Reception of Telluric Electric Waves”, by E. P. Dollard. The one
over c square is not applicable to the efforts of Nikola Tesla. Tesla is not equal to one
over c square.
In the writings of J. J. Thompson it is found he considered dielectric propagation and
magnetic propagation can be independent. Also considered is that the magnetism is a
secondary response to dielectric forces. This is also found in the writings of C. P.
Steinmentz, “Transients in Space”, page 394 to 419, from “Theory and Calculation of
Transient Electric Phenomena”. Here considered is a “Hysteresis of the Aether”, given
as an alternative to the concept of electromagnetic radiation. In this chapter the velocity
of the dielectric induction and the velocity of magnetic induction are given as
independent variables. The factor one over c squared is here only a dimensional
transform between inductance and capacitance. See The International Tesla Society
lecture on the “Hysteresis of the Aether” by E. P. Dollard. Here again one over c squared
is only a proportionality factor, not a velocity.
Finally, it has been disclosed by insiders within the space program, N.A.S.A., of a
“certain complication”. It was found that when far outside the Earth’s field of influence
the stars and sun are NOT VISIBLE! However, the Earth and the Moon are plainly
visible. No direct light in outer space, only that made visible by gross physical matter.
This gives rise to an important question, does the “light” from the sun propagate with a
velocity at all, or is it simply a function of time. The “time delay” may be no more than a
hysteresis of the luminiferous aether.
It should be noted it is only by the time delay that we can consider velocity in many
situations. Otherwise also needed is the wavelength. Is it the primary luminal induction,
say from the Sun, a hysteresis in order to engender visible light on Earth? Now we are
dug in deep!
So, what meaning do we attribute to one over c square? It is a velocity, an index, a ratio,
a proportionality factor, and even a constituent of the Farad. It is in everything, and now
we hang Einstein’s Theory of Relativity on top of it all. Such is one over c square.
In order to make a determination on this matter of one over c square it is instructive to
enter the One Wing Parrot itself. We will take the position of Dorthey, who must
conquer the Wicked Witch of the West, (WWW). Now she must stand, with her poodle
and some unlikely friends from Lone Pine, before the great Wizard of Oz. Dorthey
simply wants to go back to Kansas, and so do we. Here we must meet face to face with
Einstein and the Theory of Relativity. In order to become better acquainted with the
development of Relativity refer to E. Whittaker, “History of the Theories of the Aether”.
Here follows only the salient features of Relativity as expressed by Albert Einstein. The
primary purpose here is how Relativity relates to Electrical Engineering thru the concepts
of Inductance and Capacitance.
Einstein’s theory finds its seed in a certain speed of light dilemma and the related
experiments of Fitzeau involving moving liquid dielectrics (10-C Oil). Consider a pair of
red lasers in a setup like the cubic experiments given earlier. Two red lasers, side by
side, distant from each other, again are utilized. Each individual beam is received by its
own individual target. Here the measurements are made. One laser is stationary, the
other laser is moving towards its target at 50 percent luminal velocity, c. It is of course
found that the beam sent by the stationary laser arrives at its target with a lag in time
(hysteresis) that co-responds to the delay involved in luminal propagation thru the span
between the laser and its target. The moving laser beam also arrives at its target with a
lag in time, but not that of 150 percent luminal velocity as given by the superposition of
velocities. It arrives with the same delay as that due to luminal velocity thru the span
between the laser and its target. Hence the law of superposition is now not applicable to
luminal velocity, no matter what the velocity of the moving laser, the velocity of the
beam is always c. This situation provides the cornerstone upon which lay the Einstein
concept of Relativity.
It is however that Einstein may have left out a few details. The stationary laser puts a red
spot on its target. It is a red laser, just like the moving laser. They are both red, big deal.
But wait Mr. Wizard, Look! Look! The spot on the moving lasers target is GREEN!
Break, more to follow,
DE N6KPH