Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup
Monoclonal antibody wikipedia , lookup
Lymphopoiesis wikipedia , lookup
Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup
Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup
Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup
Update from Erica Schenhals, February 2013: This semester began by trying to identify any response to oxytocin in Jurkat T cells. Previous experiments showed inconclusive results, so new experiments were conducted to answer several hypotheses. First, I starved the Jurkat cells, which sensitizes the cells to a response that might not normally be observed. I then treated these cells with varying concentrations of oxytocin purchased from 3 different companies. The cells were then analyzed by Western blot using a PKC antibody that will show a general, nonspecific increase in activation of intracellular proteins. This antibody does not identify which proteins are being activated, but it will show if any activation is occurring. Analysis showed no change in activation. Next, I used this new PKC antibody to test proteins isolated from previous experiments conducted in Fall 2011. This antibody confirmed that oxytocin was not inducing activation in the Jurkat cells. Next, I utilized a new protocol to induce activation in the Jurkat cells. Certain intracellular proteins will only become activated when the cells are first adhered. Utilizing poly-D-lysine will simulate physiological adherence in the cells. Treatment with poly-D-lysine and then with oxytocin showed no activation of PKC, MEK, p38, ERK, or JNK. Next, I utilized flow cytometry to identify any apoptosis in the Jurkat cells. Initial experiments conducted in Spring 2011 indicated that oxytocin was inducing apoptosis in Jurkat cells. Flow cytometry analysis showed no increase in apoptosis compared to the control, suggesting that oxytocin does not induce apoptosis. Finally, I utilized a new protocol for immunofluorescence to identify the oxytocin receptor in the Jurkat cells. I used an anti-OTR antibody, which resulted in non-specific binding, and therefore inconclusive results. My previous experiments have shown that the Jurkat cells have the mRNA for the oxytocin receptor, but I have not had a successful method for determining expression of the receptor. Because I had not seen a significant, consistent response to oxytocin in the Jurkat cells, we decided to purchase a cell line known to respond to oxytocin. A breast cancer cell line, Hs578T, was used to determine if the oxytocin I have been using is effective. The Hs578T cells were treated with oxytocin at varying concentrations and time. I received positive results for these experiments that not only confirmed that the oxytocin is effective, but also provided novel results that allowed me to submit an abstract to attend the American Society for Cell Biology conference in San Francisco. My results indicated that exposure to oxytocin for 5 minutes induces a dose-dependent increase in PKC and ERK activation. I also showed that 50 nM of oxytocin induces a transient increase in PKC, ERK, and p38 activation. Lastly, results indicated that 100 nM of oxytocin significantly increases ERK activation and induces a 10-fold increase in ERK activation after 1 minute. I submitted these results in the abstract, and presented the results at the ASCB conference in December. After receiving positive results in the Hs578T breast cancer cells, we decided to continue with this cell line. Moving on from the short-term experiments, I treated the cells for 12, 24, and 48 hours with oxytocin, dexamethasone, and a combination of both. Dexamethasone induces apoptosis and is used as both a control and to determine if oxytocin could have a protective effect. There was no significant change in PKC, ERK, or AKT activation. Oxytocin does not appear to be causing any change after long-term exposure. Returning to short-term experiments, I conducted an experiment treating the Hs578T cells with LiquidTrust. LiquidTrust is oxytocin that is sold online and publicly advertised. It is not regulated by the FDA and the side effects have not yet been determined. The results are currently inconclusive, but I will be continuing with this line of inquiry. Now that I have determined that the oxytocin is effective, we know that the results on the Jurkat cells are likely true negative results. In order to return to investigating the immune effects of oxytocin, we obtained a mouse thymus from UNC to isolate thymocytes. Thymocytes are immature T cells and are more sensitive to environmental changes and therefore intracellular responses. We isolated the thymocytes and tested them for viability after treatment with oxytocin for 6 hours. These results are currently inconclusive, but will be repeated in the upcoming semester. Thymocytes were also treated with oxytocin for 1 minute or 5 minutes at either 100 nM or 10 uM. The limited number of thymocytes resulted in low concentrations of protein, which did not allow for conclusive Western blot analysis. New thymuses will be obtained and the experiment will be repeated.