Download Separation Axioms Via Kernel Set in Topological Spaces

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Geometrization conjecture wikipedia , lookup

Michael Atiyah wikipedia , lookup

Grothendieck topology wikipedia , lookup

Covering space wikipedia , lookup

General topology wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental group wikipedia , lookup

Brouwer fixed-point theorem wikipedia , lookup

3-manifold wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Archives Des Sciences
Vol 65, No. 7;Jul 2012
Separation Axioms Via
Kernel Set in Topological Spaces
Luay A. Al-Swidi
Mathematics Department, College of Education For Pure Sciences
University of Babylon
E-mail:[email protected]
Basim Mohammed M.
Mathematics Department, College of Education For Pure Sciences
University of Babylon
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
In this paper deals with the relation between the separation axioms Ti-space , i= 0,1,…,4 and Rispace i= 0,1,2,3 throughout kernel set associated with the closed set . Then we prove some theorems
related to them.
Keywords: separation axioms, Kernel set and weak separation axioms.
1. INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARIES
In1943, N.A.Shainin [4] offered a new weak separation axiom called R0 to the world of the
general topology. In 1961, A.S.Davis [1] rediscovered this axiom and he gave several interesting
characterizations of it. He defined R0, R1 and R2 entirely. He did not submit clear definition of R3space but stated it throughout this note:
( But the usual definition of β€œnormality” must be modified
slightly if R3 is to be the axiom for normal spaces.)
The present study presents the definition of R3-spaces as follows:(A topological space is
called an R3-space iff it is normal space and R1-space). This definition of R3-space satisfied with: Every
R3 is an R2-spaces. On the other hand (X, T) is aT 4-space if and only if it is an R3 -space and π‘‡π‘˜ βˆ’1 space, π‘˜ = 0, 1, 2, 3,4.
We proved Ri-spaces, 𝑖 = 0,1,2,3, by using kernel set[2,5] associated with the closed set.
We prove the topological space is aT0-space if and only if either 𝑦 βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} or π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker⁑
{𝑦} for
each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 .and a topological space (X,T) is a T 1-space if and only if for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ,then
π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker⁑
{𝑦} and 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}, also (X,T) is a T1-spacce iff π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} = {π‘₯}, and by using kernel set, we
states the relation between Ti-spaces 𝑖 = 0,1,2,3,4 and Ri-spaces 𝑖 = 0,1,2,3.
Definition 1.1.[2]
The intersection of all open subset of (X,T) containing A is called the kernel of A (briefly
ker(A) ), this means ker(A)=β‹‚{G∈T:AβŠ†G}
Definition 1.2.[1,2]
A topological space (X,T) is called
π‘ˆ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘› 𝑐𝑙{π‘₯} βŠ† 𝑋 .
an R0-space if for each open set U
and π‘₯ ∈
Definition 1.3.[1,2]
A topological space (X,T) is called an R1- space if for each two distinct point x , y of X
with 𝑐𝑙{𝑐} β‰  𝑐𝑙{𝑦} , there exist disjoint open sets U,V such that 𝑐𝑙 𝑐 βŠ† π‘ˆπ‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑐𝑙 𝑐 βŠ† 𝑉..
Corollary 1.4.[2]
Let (𝑋, 𝑇)be a topological space. Then (X,T) is R0-space if and only if, 𝑐𝑙 π‘₯ = ker⁑
{π‘₯},
for each π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋.
41
ISSN 1661-464X
Archives Des Sciences
Vol 65, No. 7;Jul 2012
Definition 1.5 [1]
A topological space (X, T) is called an R 2-space are those which are property regular
space.
Remark 1.6 [1]
The usual definition of β€œnormality” must be modified slightly if R 3 is to be the axiom
for normal spaces
Remark 1.7 [1]
Each separation axiom is defined as the conjunction of two weaker axioms: Tk-space
=Rk-1-space and Tk-1-space = R k-1-space and T0-space
Remark 1.8 [1]
Every Rk-space is an Rk-1-space.
Theorem 1.9 [3]
Every compact Hausdorf space is aT3-space (and consequently regular).
Theorem 1.10 [3]
Every compact Hausdorf space is a normal space (T4-space).
π‘³π’†π’Žπ’Žπ’‚ 𝟏. 𝟏𝟏 [𝟐]
Let (X, T) be topological space then π‘₯ ∈ 𝑐𝑙 𝑦 𝑖𝑓𝑓 𝑦 ∈ ker π‘₯ . for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋
𝟐. π‘Ήπ’Š -Spaces, π’Š = 𝟎, 𝟏, 𝟐, πŸ‘
Theorem 2.1
A topological space (X, T) is an R0-space if and only if for each F closed set and π‘₯ ∈ 𝐹
then π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ {π‘₯} βŠ† 𝐹.
Proof
Let a topological space (X,T) be a R 0-space and F be a closed set and π‘₯ ∈ 𝐹.Then for each
𝑦 βˆ‰ 𝐹 implies 𝑦 ∈ 𝐹 𝑐 is open set ,then 𝑐𝑙{𝑦} βŠ† 𝐹 𝑐 [ since (X,T) is R0-space ], so π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝑐𝑙{𝑦}. Hence by
theorem 1.11, 𝑦 βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} . Thus ker⁑
{π‘₯} βŠ† 𝐹
Conversely
Let for each F closed set and π‘₯ ∈ 𝐹 then π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ {π‘₯} βŠ† 𝐹and let π‘ˆ ∈ 𝑇 , π‘₯ ∈ π‘ˆ then for each
𝑦 βˆ‰ π‘ˆ implies 𝑦 ∈ π‘ˆ 𝑐 is a closed set implies ker⁑
{𝑦} βŠ† π‘ˆ 𝑐 . Therefore π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker⁑{𝑦} and 𝑦 βˆ‰ 𝑐𝑙{π‘₯}
[By theorem 1.11]. So 𝑐𝑙{π‘₯} βŠ† π‘ˆ . Thus (X, T) is an R0-space.
Corollary 2.2
A topological space (X, T) is an R0-space if and only if for each U open set and π‘₯ ∈ π‘ˆ
then 𝑐𝑙(π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ ) βŠ† π‘ˆ.
Theorem 2.3
A topological space (X, T) is an R1-space if and only if for eachπ‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 with
π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ β‰  π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑦 then there exist closed sets F1, F2 such that ker π‘₯ βŠ† 𝐹1 , ker π‘₯ ⋂𝐹2 =
βˆ…π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ ker 𝑦 βŠ† 𝐹2 , ker 𝑦 ⋂𝐹1 = βˆ…π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘πΉ1 ⋃𝐹2 = 𝑋
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇
Let a topological space (X, T) be an R1-space. Then for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 with π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ β‰ 
π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑦 . Since every 𝑅1 βˆ’ π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘π‘’ 𝑖𝑠 π‘Žπ‘› π‘…π‘œ _π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘π‘’ [by remark 1.8, hence by theorem 1.4,
𝑐𝑙{π‘₯} β‰  𝑐𝑙{𝑦}, then there exist open sets G1, G2 such that 𝑐𝑙 π‘₯ βŠ† 𝐺1 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑐𝑙 𝑦 βŠ† 𝐺2 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐺1 ⋂𝐺2 =
βˆ… [Since (X, T) is R1-space], then 𝐺1𝑐 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐺2𝑐 are closed sets such that𝐺1𝑐 ⋃𝐺2𝑐 = 𝑋. Put 𝐹1 =
𝐺1𝑐 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘πΉ2 = 𝐺2𝑐 Thus x ∈ 𝐺1 βŠ† 𝐹2 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐺2 βŠ† 𝐹1 so that ker⁑{π‘₯} βŠ† 𝐺1 βŠ† 𝐹2 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} βŠ† 𝐺2 βŠ†
𝐹1 .
Conversely
Let for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 with π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ β‰  π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑦 , there exist closed sets F1, F2 such that
ker π‘₯ βŠ† 𝐹1 , ker π‘₯ ⋂𝐹2 = βˆ…π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ ker 𝑦 βŠ† 𝐹2 , ker 𝑦 ⋂𝐹1 = βˆ…π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘πΉ1 ⋃𝐹2 = 𝑋 , then 𝐹1𝑐 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐹2𝑐 are
42
ISSN 1661-464X
Archives Des Sciences
Vol 65, No. 7;Jul 2012
open sets such that 𝐹1𝑐 ⋂𝐹2𝑐 = βˆ… . Put 𝐹1𝑐 = 𝐺2 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐹2𝑐 = 𝐺1 . Thus ker⁑
{π‘₯} βŠ† 𝐺1 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} βŠ† 𝐺2
and 𝐺1 ⋂𝐺2 = βˆ… , so that π‘₯ ∈ 𝐺1 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐺2 implies π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝑐𝑙{𝑦} π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 βˆ‰ 𝑐𝑙{π‘₯} , then cl⁑
{π‘₯} βŠ†
𝐺1 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑐𝑙{𝑦} βŠ† 𝐺2 . Thus (𝑋, 𝑇) is an R1-space.
Corollary 2.4
A topological space (X, T) is an R1-space if and only if for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 with
𝑐𝑙 π‘₯ β‰  𝑐𝑙 𝑦 then there exist disjoint open sets U, V such that 𝑐𝑙 π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ βŠ† π‘ˆ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑐𝑙(π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑦 ) βŠ†
𝑉
Proof
Let (X, T) be an R1-space and let π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 with 𝑐𝑙 π‘₯ β‰  𝑐𝑙 𝑦 , then there exist disjoint
open sets U, V such that 𝑐𝑙{π‘₯} βŠ† π‘ˆ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑐𝑙{𝑦} βŠ† 𝑉.
Also (𝑋, 𝑇) is R0-spece [by remark 1.8] implies for each π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋, then 𝑐𝑙 π‘₯ = ker⁑
{π‘₯} [By theorem
1.4], but 𝑐𝑙 π‘₯ = 𝑐𝑙 𝑐𝑙 π‘₯ = cl(ker π‘₯ ). Thus 𝑐𝑙 π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ βŠ† π‘ˆ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑐𝑙(π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑦 ) βŠ† 𝑉
Conversely
Let for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 with 𝑐𝑙 π‘₯ β‰  𝑐𝑙 𝑦 then there exist disjoint open sets U, V such
that 𝑐𝑙 π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ βŠ† π‘ˆ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑐𝑙(π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑦 ) βŠ† 𝑉 . Since {π‘₯} βŠ† ker⁑{π‘₯} π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘› 𝑐𝑙{π‘₯} βŠ† 𝑐𝑙(ker π‘₯ ) for
each π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋 So we get 𝑐𝑙{π‘₯} βŠ† π‘ˆ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑐𝑙{
Theorem 2.5
A topological space (X,T) is a regular space(R2-space) if and only if for each closed
subset G of X and π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝐺 with ker⁑
(𝐺) β‰  π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ then there exist closed sets F1 , F2 such that
ker(𝐺) βŠ† 𝐹1 , ker(𝐺) ⋂𝐹2 = βˆ…π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ ker π‘₯ βŠ† 𝐹2 , ker π‘₯ ⋂𝐹1 = βˆ…π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐹1 ⋃𝐹2 = 𝑋
Proof
Let a topological space (X,T) be a regular space(R2-space) and let G be a closed set,
π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝐺 ,then there exist open sets U , V such that𝐺 βŠ† π‘ˆ , π‘₯ ∈ 𝑉 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘ˆβ‹‚π‘‰ = βˆ… , then π‘ˆ 𝑐 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑉 𝑐
are closed sets such that π‘ˆ 𝑐 ⋃𝑉 𝑐 = 𝑋 .Put 𝐹2 = π‘ˆ 𝑐 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐹1=𝑉 𝑐 , so we get ker(𝐺) βŠ† π‘ˆ βŠ†
𝐹1 , ker(𝐺) ⋂𝐹2 = βˆ… π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ ker π‘₯ βŠ† 𝑉 βŠ† 𝐹2 , ker π‘₯ ⋂𝐹1 = βˆ… π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐹1 ⋃𝐹2 = 𝑋.
Conversely
Let for each closed subset G of X and π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝐺 with ker⁑(𝐺) β‰  π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ then there exist
closed sets F1 , F2 such that ker(𝐺) βŠ† 𝐹1 , ker(𝐺) ⋂𝐹2 = βˆ… π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ ker⁑
{π‘₯} βŠ† 𝐹2 , ker π‘₯ ⋂𝐹1 =
βˆ… π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐹1 ⋃𝐹2 = 𝑋 .Then 𝐹1𝑐 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐹2𝑐 are open sets such that 𝐹1𝑐 ⋂𝐹2𝑐 = βˆ… and ker⁑
(𝐺)⋂𝐹1𝑐 =
𝑐
𝑐
𝑐
βˆ… , ker⁑
{π‘₯} ⋂𝐹2 = βˆ… ,so that 𝐺 βŠ† 𝐹2 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘₯ ∈ 𝐹1 . Thus (X, T) is a regular space (R2-space).
π‘³π’†π’Žπ’Žπ’‚ 𝟐. πŸ”
Let (𝑋, 𝑇) be a regular space and 𝐹 be a closed set. Then ker 𝐹 = 𝑐𝑙 𝐹 = 𝐹.
Proof
Let (X,T) be a regular space and 𝐹 be a closed set. Then for each π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝐹,there exist disjoint
open sets π‘ˆ, 𝑉 such that 𝐹 βŠ† π‘ˆ and π‘₯ ∈ 𝑉 . Since ker⁑
(𝐹) βŠ† π‘ˆ ,implies ker 𝐹 ⋂𝑉 = βˆ… ,thus
π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝑐𝑙(ker 𝐹 ). We showing that if π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝐹 implies π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝑐𝑙(ker 𝐹 ), therefore 𝑐𝑙(ker 𝐹 βŠ† 𝑐𝑙 𝐹 =
𝐹. As 𝑐𝑙 𝐹 = 𝐹 βŠ† ker⁑(𝐹)[By definition 1.1]. Thus ker 𝐹 = 𝑐𝑙 𝐹 = 𝐹.
Theorem 2.7
A topological space (X,T) is a regular space (R2-space) if and only if for each closed
subset F of X and π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝐹 with cl(ker 𝐹 ) β‰  𝑐𝑙(π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ ) then there exist disjoint open sets U, V
such that 𝑐𝑙(ker 𝐹 ) βŠ† π‘ˆ and 𝑐𝑙(π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ ) βŠ† 𝑉 .
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇
Let a topological space (X,T) be a regular space (R2-space)and let F be a closed set, π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝐹
. Then there exist disjoint open set π‘ˆ, 𝑉 such that 𝐹 βŠ† π‘ˆ and π‘₯ ∈ 𝑉. By lemma 2.6, cl ker 𝐹 =
𝑐𝑙 𝐹 = 𝐹 .in the other hand (X,T) is an R0-space [By remark 1.8]. Hence, by theorem
1.4, cl π‘₯ = ker⁑
{π‘₯} for each π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋 . Thus 𝑐𝑙(ker 𝐹 ) βŠ† π‘ˆ and 𝑐𝑙(π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ ) βŠ† 𝑉 .
Conversely
43
ISSN 1661-464X
Archives Des Sciences
Vol 65, No. 7;Jul 2012
Let for each closed set F and π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝐹 with cl(ker 𝐹 ) β‰  𝑐𝑙(π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ ) then there exist disjoint
open sets U, V such that 𝑐𝑙(ker 𝐹 ) βŠ† π‘ˆ and 𝑐𝑙(π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ ) βŠ† 𝑉 .Then 𝐹 βŠ† π‘ˆ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘₯ ∈ 𝑉 . Thus (𝑋, 𝑇)
a regular space(R2-space).
Definition 2.8
A topological space (X,T) is an R3-space if and only if (X, T) is a normal and R1-space.
Theorem 2.9
Every 𝑅3 -space is a regular space(R2-space).
Proof
Let F be a closed and π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝐹 . Then π‘₯ ∈ 𝐹 𝑐 is an open set implies
for each 𝑦 ∈ 𝐹,
𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}, therefore ker⁑
{π‘₯} β‰  ker⁑{𝑦}. Then there exist closed sets Gy , Hy such that π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑦 βŠ†
𝐺𝑦 , π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿβ‘
{𝑦} ∩ 𝐻𝑦 = βˆ… and π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} βŠ† 𝐻𝑦 , πΎπ‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯}β‹‚ 𝐺𝑦 = βˆ…[ Since(X,T) is R1-space by assumption
and by theorem 2.3], let 𝛽 = β‹‚{𝐻𝑦 ∢ π‘₯ ∈ 𝐻𝑦 }, is a closed set such that 𝛽⋂𝐹 = βˆ…. Hence (𝑋, 𝑇) is a
normal space then there exist disjoint open sets π‘ˆ, 𝑉 such that FβŠ†U and 𝛽 βŠ† 𝑉, so that π‘₯ ∈ 𝑉.
Thus (𝑋, 𝑇) is a regular space.
3. π‘»π’Š -Spaces, π’Š = 𝟎, 𝟏, . . . , πŸ’
Theorem 3.1
A topological space (X,T) is a T0-space if and only if either 𝑦 βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} or π‘₯ βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} ,
for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋.
Proof
Let (X, T) is a T0-space then for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋, there exists an open set G such
that π‘₯ ∈ 𝐺, 𝑦 βˆ‰ 𝐺 π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝐺, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐺. Thus either π‘₯ ∈ 𝐺, 𝑦 βˆ‰ 𝐺 implies 𝑦 βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} or π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝐺, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐺
implies π‘₯ βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦}.
Conversely
Let either 𝑦 βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} or π‘₯ βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} , for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋. Then there exists an open set G
such that x ∈ 𝐺 , 𝑦 βˆ‰ 𝐺 π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝐺, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐺. Thus (X, T) is a T0 space.
Theorem 3.2
A topological space (X, T) is a T1-space if and only if for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋. 𝑦 βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} and
π‘₯ βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦}
Proof
Let (X, T) is a T1-space then for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋, there exists an open sets π‘ˆ, 𝑉 such
that π‘₯ ∈ π‘ˆ, 𝑦 βˆ‰ π‘ˆ π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉, π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝑉 . Implies 𝑦 βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} and π‘₯ βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} .
Conversely
Let 𝑦 βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} and π‘₯ βˆ‰ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} , for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 . Then there exists an open sets π‘ˆ, 𝑉
such that π‘₯ ∈ π‘ˆ, 𝑦 βˆ‰ π‘ˆ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉, π‘₯ βˆ‰ 𝑉. Thus (X, T) is a T1- space.
Theorem 3.3
A topological space (X, T) is a T1-space if and only if for each π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋 then π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} = {π‘₯}.
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇
Let (X, T) is aT1-space and let π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} β‰  {π‘₯}, then π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} contains anther point distinct
from x say y. So 𝑦 ∈ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯}. Hence by theorem 3.2, (X, T) is not a T1-space this is contradiction.
Thus π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} = {π‘₯}
Conversely
Let π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} = {π‘₯} , for each π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋 and let (𝑋, 𝑇) is not a T1-space. Then
𝑦 ∈ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯}
(say)[By theorem 3.2], implies π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} β‰  {π‘₯} , this is contradiction . Thus (X, T) is a T1-space.
Theorem 3.4
A topological space (X, T) is a T1-space if and only if for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋
implies ker x β‹‚ker 𝑦 = βˆ….
44
ISSN 1661-464X
Archives Des Sciences
Vol 65, No. 7;Jul 2012
Proof
Let a topological space (X, T) be a T1-space.Then π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} = {π‘₯} and π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} = 𝑦 [By
theorem 3.3]. Thus ker x β‹‚ker 𝑦 = βˆ….
Conversely
Let for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 implies ker x β‹‚ker 𝑦 = βˆ…and let (X,T) is not T1-space Then
for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 implies 𝑦 ∈ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ or π‘₯ ∈ π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} , The ker x β‹‚ker 𝑦 β‰  βˆ… . This is
contradiction. Thus (X, T) is a T1-space.
Corollary 3.5
A topological an T0-space is a T2-space if and only if for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 with
π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ β‰  π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑦 then there exist closed sets F1, F2 such that ker π‘₯ βŠ† 𝐹1 , ker π‘₯ ⋂𝐹2 =
βˆ…π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ ker 𝑦 βŠ† 𝐹2 , ker 𝑦 ⋂𝐹1 = βˆ…π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘πΉ1 ⋃𝐹2 = 𝑋
Proof
By theorem 2.3 and remark 1.7.
π‘ͺπ’π’“π’π’π’π’‚π’“π’š πŸ‘. πŸ”
A topological T1-space is a T2-space if and only if one of the following conditions holds:
1) For each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 with 𝑐𝑙 π‘₯ β‰  𝑐𝑙 𝑦 then there exist open sets U, V such
that 𝑐𝑙 π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯
βŠ† π‘ˆ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑐𝑙(π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑦 ) βŠ† 𝑉
2) for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 with π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ β‰  π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑦 then there exist closed sets F1, F2 such that
ker π‘₯ βŠ† 𝐹1 , ker π‘₯ ⋂𝐹2 = βˆ…π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ ker 𝑦 βŠ† 𝐹2 , ker 𝑦 ⋂𝐹1 = βˆ…π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘πΉ1 ⋃𝐹2 = 𝑋.
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇 (𝟏)
By corollary 2.4 and remark 1.7.
Proof (2)
By theorem 2.3 and remark 1.7.
Theorem 3.7
A topological R1-space is a T2-space if and only if one of the following conditions holds:
1) πΉπ‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋, π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} = {π‘₯}.
2) For each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋,ker⁑{π‘₯} β‰  ker⁑
{𝑦}implies ker π‘₯ β‹‚π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} = βˆ…
.
3) For each for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋, π‘’π‘–π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}
4) For each for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 then π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑{π‘₯} .
Proof (1)
Let (X, T) be a T2-space .Then (X, T) is a T1-space and R1-space [By remark 1.7]. Hence by
theorem 3.3, ker{x} ={x} for each π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋.
Conversely
Let for each π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋, ker{x} ={x}, then by theorem 3.3, (X, T) is a T1-space. Also (X, T) is an
R1-space by assumption. Hence by remark1.7, (X, T) is aT2- space.
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇 (𝟐)
Let (X, T) be a T2-space .Then (X, T) is a T1-space. Hence by theorem 3.4,
ker π‘₯ β‹‚π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} = βˆ… for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋.
Conversely
Assume that for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 , ker⁑
{π‘₯} β‰  ker⁑
{𝑦} implies ker π‘₯ β‹‚π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} = βˆ…, so by
theorem 3.4, the topological space (X, T) is a T1-space, also (X, T) is an R1-space by assumption.
Hence by remark 1.7, (𝑋, 𝑇) is a T2-space.
Proof (3)
Let (X, T) be a T2-space .Then (X, T) is a T0-space. Hence by theorem 23.1, π‘’π‘–π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ βˆ‰
ker 𝑦 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑{π‘₯} for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋.
45
ISSN 1661-464X
Archives Des Sciences
Vol 65, No. 7;Jul 2012
Conversely
Assume that for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋, π‘’π‘–π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋.
, so by theorem 3.1, (X, T) is a T0-space also (X, T) is an R1-space by assumption. Thus (X, T) is a
T2-space [By remark 1.7].
Proof (4)
Let (X, T) be a T2-space.Then (X,T) is a T1-space and an R1-space [By remark 1.7]. Hence
by theorem 3.2, π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}.
Conversely
Let for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 then π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}. Then by theorem 3.2, (X, T)
is a T1-space. Also (X, T) is an R1-space by assumption. Hence by remark 1.7, (X, T) is a T2-space.
Theorem 3.8
A topological space (X,T) is a normal space if and only if for each disjoint closed sets G ,
H with π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝐺 β‰  π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝐻 then there exist closed sets F1 , F2 such that ker(𝐺) βŠ† 𝐹1 , ker(𝐺) ⋂𝐹2 =
βˆ…π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ ker(𝐻) βŠ† 𝐹2 , ker(𝐻) ⋂𝐹_1 = βˆ…π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐹_1⋃𝐹_2 = 𝑋.
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇
Let (X,T) be a normal topological space and let for each disjoint closed sets G , H with
𝑐𝑙 𝐺 β‰  𝑐𝑙 𝐻 then there exist disjoint open sets U , V such that𝐺 βŠ† π‘ˆ , 𝐻 βŠ† 𝑉 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘ˆβ‹‚π‘‰ = βˆ…,
then π‘ˆ 𝑐 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑉 𝑐 are closed sets such that π‘ˆ 𝑐 ⋃𝑉 𝑐 = 𝑋 and ker(𝐺)β‹‚π‘ˆ 𝑐 = βˆ… , π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ(𝐻)⋂𝑉 𝑐 = βˆ….
Put
𝐹2 = π‘ˆ 𝑐 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐹1=𝑉 𝑐
.Thus
ker(𝐺) βŠ† π‘ˆ βŠ† 𝐹1 , ker(𝐺) ⋂𝐹2 = βˆ… π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ ker(𝐻) βŠ† 𝑉 βŠ†
𝐹2 , ker(𝐻) ⋂𝐹1 = βˆ… π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐹1 ⋃𝐹2 = 𝑋.
Conversely
Let for each disjoint closed sets G, H with π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝐺 β‰  π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝐻 , there exist closed sets F1 ,
F2 such that ker(𝐺) βŠ† 𝐹1 , ker(𝐺) ⋂𝐹2 = βˆ… π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ ker(𝐻) βŠ† 𝐹2 , ker(𝐻) ⋂𝐹1 = βˆ… π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐹1 ⋃𝐹2 = 𝑋 ,
implies 𝐹1𝑐 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐹2𝑐 are open sets such that 𝐹1𝑐 ⋂𝐹2𝑐 = βˆ… and ker⁑(𝐺)⋂𝐹1𝑐 = βˆ… , ker⁑
(𝐻) ⋂𝐹2𝑐 = βˆ…
𝑐
𝑐
,so that 𝐺 βŠ† 𝐹2 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐻 βŠ† 𝐹1 . Thus (X,T) is a normal space.
Theorem 3.9
A topological compact an R1-space is a T3-space if and only if one of the following
conditions holds:
1)π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋, ker π‘₯ = {π‘₯}
2)π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋, ker π‘₯ β‹‚π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑦 = βˆ….
3)π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘› π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}
4)π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 π‘’π‘–π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑{π‘₯}
Proof (1)
Let (X, T) be a T3-space .Then (X,T) is a T1-space , by theorem 3.3, π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ ∈
𝑋, ker π‘₯ = {π‘₯}
Conversely
Let for each π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋, π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} = {π‘₯}, then by theorem 3.3. (X, T) is a T1-space. Also (X, T) is
a compact R1-space by assumption. So by remark1.7, we get (X, T) is a compact T2- space .Hence
by theorem 1.9, (X, T) is a T3-space
Proof (2)
Let (X, T) be a T3-space .Then (X, T) is a T1-space. Hence by theorem 3.4, π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰ 
𝑦 ∈ 𝑋, ker π‘₯ β‹‚π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} = βˆ…
Conversely
Assume that π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋, ker π‘₯ β‹‚π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} = βˆ…, so by theorem 3.4, the topological
space (X, T) is a T1- space, also (X,T) is a compact R1-space by assumption. So by remark1.7, (X,T)
is a compact T2-space. Hence by theorem 1.9, (X, T) is a T3- space.
46
ISSN 1661-464X
Archives Des Sciences
Vol 65, No. 7;Jul 2012
Proof (3)
Let (X, T) be a T3-space .Then (X, T) is a T1-space. Hence by theorem 3.3, then
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘› π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}
Conversely
Assume thatπ‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘› π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}, then by theorem 3.3,
(X, T) is a T1-space also(X, T) is a Compact R1-space by assumption. Thus (X, T) is a compact T2space [By remark 1.7]. Hence by theorem 1.9, (X, T) is a T3-space.
Proof (4)
Let (X, T) be a T3-space.Then (X,T) is
ker 𝑦 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑{π‘₯}, for each π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋
a T0-space. So by theorem 3.1, π‘’π‘–π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ βˆ‰
Conversely
Let π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 π‘’π‘–π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}. Then by theorem 3.1, (X, T)
is a T1-space. Also (X, T) is a compact R1-space by assumption . Hence by remark 1.7, (X, T) is a
compact T2-space. Henceby theorem1.9, (X,T) is a T3-space.
Theorem 3.11
A topological compact an R1-space is a T4-space if and only if one of the following
conditions holds:
a) π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋, ker π‘₯ = {π‘₯}
b)π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋, ker π‘₯ β‹‚π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} = βˆ…
c)π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘› π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}
d)π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 π‘’π‘–π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}
Proof (1)
Let (X, T) be a T4-space .Then (X, T) is a T1-space, by theorem 3.3, π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} = {π‘₯} for each
π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋.
Conversely
Let for each x οƒŽ X , π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{π‘₯} = {π‘₯}, then by theorem 3.3. (𝑋, 𝑇) is a T1-space. Also (𝑋, 𝑇)
is a compact R1-space by assumption. So by remark1.7, we get (X, T) is a compact T2- space .Hence
by theorem1.10, (X, T) is a T4-space
Proof (2)
Let (X, T) be a T4-space .Then (X,T) is a T1-space. Hence by theorem 3.4, π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰ 
𝑦 ∈ 𝑋, ker π‘₯ β‹‚π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} = βˆ…
π‘ͺπ’π’π’—π’†π’“π’”π’†π’π’š
Assume that π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋, ker π‘₯ β‹‚π‘˜π‘’π‘Ÿ{𝑦} = βˆ… so by theorem 3.4, the topological
space (X, T) is a T1-space, also (X, T) is a compact R1-space by assumption. So by remark1.7, (X, T)
is a compact T2-space. Hence by theorem 1.10, (X, T) is a T4-space .
Proof (3)
Let (X, T) be a T4-space .Then (X, T) is a T1-space. Hence by theorem 3.2, then
π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘› π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}
Conversely
Assume that π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘› π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑{π‘₯} , then by theorem 3.2,
(X, T) is a T1-space also(X, T) is a compact R1-space by assumption. Thus (X,T) is a compact T2space [By remark 1.7]. Hence by theorem 1.10, (X,T) is a T4-space
Proof (4)
Let (X, T) be a T4-space.Then (X, T) is a T0-space. So by theorem 3.1, π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈
𝑋 π‘’π‘–π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯}
Conversely
47
ISSN 1661-464X
Archives Des Sciences
Vol 65, No. 7;Jul 2012
Let π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘β„Ž π‘₯ β‰  𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 π‘’π‘–π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿ π‘₯ βˆ‰ ker 𝑦 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝑦 βˆ‰ ker⁑
{π‘₯} Then by Theorem 3.1, (X, T)
is a T0-space. Also (X, T) is a compact R1-space by assumption. Hence by remark 1.7, (X, T) is a
compact T2-space. Hence by theorem1.9,(X,T) is a T4-space.
REFERENCES
[1] A.S.Davis.(1961). Indexed system of Neighborhood for general Topology Amer. Math. Soc. (9)
68, 886-893, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2311686
[2] Bishwambhar Roy and M.N.Mukherjee. (2010). A unified theory for R0, R1. Bol. Soc. Paran.
Mat. (3s) v.28.2, http://www.spm.uem.br/bspm/pdf/vol28-2/Art2.pdf
[3] J.N.Sharma. (1977). β€œgeneral topology" Krishna Prakashan, Meerut(U.P).
[4] N. A. Shanin.(1943), On separation in topological spaces, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 38, 110-113.
48
ISSN 1661-464X