Download ThE ROLE OF RIVERS ON ThE REGIONAL CARBON

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Global warming wikipedia , lookup

Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup

Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup

General circulation model wikipedia , lookup

Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup

Climate governance wikipedia , lookup

Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup

Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup

Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup

Carbon pricing in Australia wikipedia , lookup

Climate-friendly gardening wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup

Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup

Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup

Reforestation wikipedia , lookup

Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup

Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup

Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Biosequestration wikipedia , lookup

Blue carbon wikipedia , lookup

Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup

Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
FAPESP RESEARCH PROGRAM on
GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE
THE ROLE OF RIVERS ON THE REGIONAL CARBON CYCLE
Reynaldo Luiz Victoria
Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture (Cena), University of São Paulo (USP)
FAPESP Process 2008/58089-9
Term: Jun 2009 to May 2013
Contact: Av. Centenario, 303, CEP 13416-000, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
+55-19-3429-4078
[email protected]
Collaborating institutions: Embrapa Pantanal, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa); Emilio Goeldi Museum, PA;
Federal University of Acre (Ufac), AC; Federal University of Amazon (Ufam), AM; Federal University of Rondônia (Unir), RO; Minas
Gerais State University (UEMG), MG; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), France; Institute of Astronomy, Geophysics
and Atmospheric Science (IAG), USP; Institute of Geosciences (IG), USP; Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL), USA; National Institute of
Amazonian Research (Inpa), AM; University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada; University of Washington (UW), USA.
SCIENCE QUESTIONS AND OBJECTIVES
We hypothesize that: H1. Hydrology is the main
driver of the biogeochemistry of carbon (and other
nutrients) in rivers of the Amazon and Pantanal.
Hence, different amounts of rain (and runoff ) will
set new functional levels in these systems; H2. There
are common set of drivers controlling carbon (and
nutrients) biogeochemistry in tropical rivers of the
Amazon and Pantanal. Our current inability to model
adequately these systems across all scales results from
the lack of intercomparable long-time records, instead
of the inadequacy of the models; H3. Rivers are active
players in the overall carbon balance of these basins.
Climatic changes affecting these systems will also
change their role in feedbacks with the atmosphere and
the regional carbon cycle. The outcome of this project
will be fundamental to the development of the Brazilian
climatic model, helping to create a unique design in
which not only biosphere but also fluvial feedbacks
are considered in the regional carbon cycle. Our main
objective is to produce enough scientific information
about the functioning of these fluvial systems to be
able to develop basin-scale heuristic models linked
to regional carbon cycle and allowing to predict their
responses to global climate change. The specific goals
are:
Goal 1. Obtain detailed information on carbon and
associated nutrients distribution and processing along
the different spatial and temporal scales necessary
to define common sets of drivers in the functioning
of rivers under pristine and impacted environmental
conditions.
Figure 1. The Beija-Rio Network sampling sites
Goal 2. Reduce the uncertainties in CO2 evasive
fluxes (hence on the role of rivers in the regional
C cycle) by increasing the frequency of direct flux
measurements with stationary chambers and through
specific campaigns using all applicable methods
(chambers, gradients, eddy covariance etc.) at endmember conditions (streams vs. large rivers, windy vs.
calm conditions, high vs. low pCO2 rivers, day vs. night
fluxes etc.) to define the respective associated errors.
Goal 3. Adjust and validate hydrobiogeochemical
models across different space an time scales, in order
to test the responses of river systems to changes in
their different biogeochemical drivers caused by global
climatic changes.
www.fapesp.br/mcg
CURRENT RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES
related publications
Our recent results on the controls of the
biogeochemistry (and ultimately the fate) of carbon
in fluvial systems show that, regardless of any scale
or basin characteristic, the distribution of biogenic
species show the same seasonal patterns, tightly
connected to the hydrograph (Figure 2, Richey et
al., 2010). A small scale basins, with pronounced dry
season, instream processes parallel those in adjacent
terrestrial systems (Neu et al., in press). This is extremely
important to develop adequate models to describe
C cycle in these systems: a common seasonal pattern
tied to the hydrograph might simplify significantly the
up-scaling. Looking at altered systems as proxies for
expected future responses can be an important source
of information. Both land cover changes and recent
extreme climate events have offered us opportunities
to look at some of these responses. For example, our
analysis of the 2004 - 2007 data from the Madeira river
showed that, although a severe drought that occurred
in southern Amazon in 2005 affected total annual
discharge both in 2005 and 2006, it was only when
a 25% reduction was reached in 2005 that changes
in distribution of sediments and dissolved inorganic
carbon were significant (Figure 2, Leite et al., in press).
Therefore, acquiring long-term data as we propose in
this project will allow us to establish these types of
thresholds essentials to modeling.
Germer S, Neill C, Vetter T, Chaves J, Krusche AV, Elsenbeer
H. 2009. Implications of long-term land-use change for
the hydrology and solute budgets of small catchments in
Amazonia. Journal of Hydrology. 364: 349-363.
Madeira
Silveira JM, Barlow J, Krusche AV, Orwin KH, Balch JK. 2009.
Effects of experimental fires on litter decomposition in a
seasonally dry Amazonian forest. Journal of Tropical Ecololgy.
25: 657-663.
Richey JE, Krusche AV, Johnson M, Cunha HB, Ballester MV.
2009. The role of rivers in the regional carbon balance.
Amazonia and Climate Change. In: Keller M, Bustamante M,
Gash J, Dias P (eds.) LBA Synthesis Volume - Amazonia and
Global Change. AGU Press.
Krusche AV, Ballester MVR, Leite NK. 2011. Hydrology and
biogeochemistry of lowland tropical forests. In: Carlyle-Moses
DE, Tanaka T. (Eds.). Forest hydrology and biogeochemistry:
synthesis of past research and future directions. Ecological
Studies Series, n. 216, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany:
In press.
Leite NK, Krusche AV, Ballester MVR, Victoria RL, Richey JE, &
Gomes BM. In press. Intra and interannual variability in the
Madeira river water chemistry and sediment load.
Ji-Paraná
pCO2 (103)
Q (103 m3/s)
Solimões
Germer S, Neill C, Krusche AV, Elsenbeer H. 2010. Influence
of land-use change on near-surface hydrological processes:
Undisturbed forest to pasture. Journal of Hydrology. 380:
473-480.
pH
co-pi’s and associates
Discharge (m3, s-1)
Discharge (m3, s-1)
Figure 2. 2004 - 2007 discharge (Q) and chemistry (DOC, PH, susp.
sed. and pCO2) at the Solimões, Madeira and Ji-Paraná rivers
Coarse Suspended Sediment (mg.L-1) Dissolved Organic Carbon (µM)
Discharge (m3, s-1)
Alex Vladimir Krusche, Cena/USP
Fine Suspended Sediment (mg.L-1) Total Suspended Sediment (mg.L-1)
Discharge (m3, s-1)
DOC (mg/l)
Maria Victoria Ramos Ballester, Cena/USP
Associated Researchers
Hillandia Brandão, Inpa, AM
Maria Emilia da Cruz Sales, MPEG, PA
Ivan Bergier Tavares de Lima, Embrapa Pantanal
Cleber Ibraim Salimon, Federal University of Acre
Alan Cavalcanti da Cunha, Federal University of Amapá
Jeffrey Edward Richey, University of Washington (EUA)
Christopher Neill, Marine Biology Laboratory (EUA)