Download THEORETICAL PROPERTIES OF THE WEIGHTED FELLER

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Statistics wikipedia , lookup

History of statistics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ASIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 2014, Article ID ama0173, 12 pages
ISSN 2307-7743
http://scienceasia.asia
THEORETICAL PROPERTIES OF THE WEIGHTED FELLER-PARETO
AND RELATED DISTRIBUTIONS
OLUSEYI ODUBOTE AND BRODERICK O. OLUYEDE
Abstract. In this paper, for the first time, a new six-parameter class of distributions called
weighted Feller-Pareto (WFP) and related family of distributions is proposed. This new class
of distributions contains several other Pareto-type distributions such as length-biased (LB)
Pareto, weighted Pareto (WP I, II, III, and IV), and Pareto (P I, II, III, and IV) distributions
as special cases. The pdf, cdf, hazard and reverse hazard functions, monotonicity properties,
moments, entropy measures including Renyi, Shannon and s-entropies are derived.
1. Introduction
Pareto distributions provide models for many applications in social, natural and physical
sciences and are related to many other families of distribution. A hierarchy of the Pareto
distributions has been established starting from the classical Pareto (I) to Pareto (IV) distributions with subsequent additional parameters related to location, shape and inequality. A
general version of this family of distributions is called the Pareto (IV) distribution. Pareto
distribution has applications in a wide variety of settings including clusters of Bose-Einstein
condensate near absolute zero, file size distribution of internet traffic that uses the TCP
protocol, values of oil reserves in oil fields, standardized price returns on individual stocks,
to mention a few areas.
Brazauskas (2002) determined the exact form of the Fisher information matrix for the
Feller-Pareto distribution. Rizzo (2009) developed a new approach to goodness of fit test
for Pareto distributions. Riabi et al. (2010) obtained entropy measures for the family of
weighted Pareto-type distributions with the the general weight function w(x; k, t, i, j) =
xk etx F i (x)F̄ j (x), where F (x) and F̄ (x) = 1 − F (x) are the cumulative distribution function
(cdf) and survival or reliability function, respectively.
1.1. Some Basic Utility Notions. Suppose the distribution of a continuous random variable X has the parameter set θ∗ = {θ1 , θ2 , · · · , θn }. Let the probability density function (pdf)
∗
of X be given
R x by f (x;∗ θ ). The cumulative distribution function (cdf) of X, is defined to be
∗
F (x; θ ) = −∞ f (t; θ ) dt. The hazard rate and reverse hazard rate functions are given by
∗)
f (x;θ∗ )
, and τ (x; θ∗ ) = Ff (x;θ
, respectively, where F̄ (x; θ∗ ) is the survival or relih(x; θ∗ ) = 1−F
(x;θ∗ )
(x;θ∗ )
ability function. The following useful
R ∞ functions are applied in subsequent sections. The gamma function is given by Γ(x) = 0 tx−1 e−t dt. The first and the second derivative of the gamR∞
R∞
0
00
ma function are given by: Γ (x) = 0 tx−1 (log t)e−t dt, and Γ (x) = 0 tx−1 (log t)2 e−t dt,
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 62E15.
Key words and phrases. Weighted Feller-Pareto Distribution, Feller-Pareto distribution, Pareto Distribution, Moments, Entropy.
c
2014
Science Asia
1
2
ODUBOTE AND OLUYEDE
0
respectively. The digamma function is defined by Ψ(x) = Γ (x)/Γ(x). The
incomR x lower
s−1 −t
plete gamma
R ∞ function and upper incomplete gamma function are γ(s, x) = 0 t e dt and
Γ(s, x) = x ts−1 e−t dt, respectively.
Let a, b > 0, then
Z 1
Γ(a)Γ(b)
xa−1 (1 − x)b−1 ln(x) dx =
(1)
(Ψ(a) − Ψ(a + b)).
Γ(a + b)
0
1.2. Introduction to Weighted Distributions. Statistical applications of weighted distributions, especially to the analysis of data relating to human population and ecology can
be found in Patil and Rao (1978). To introduce the concept of a weighted distribution, suppose X is a non-negative random variable (rv) with its natural probability density function
(pdf) f (x; θ), where the natural parameter is θ ∈ Ω (Ω is the parameter space). Suppose a
realization x of X under f (x; θ) enters the investigator’s record with probability proportional
to w(x; β), so that the recording (weight) function w(x; β) is a non-negative function with
the parameter β representing the recording (sighting) mechanism. Clearly, the recorded x is
not an observation on X, but on the rv Xw , having a pdf
w(x, β)f (x; θ)
(2)
fw (x; θ, β) =
,
ω
where ω is the normalizing factor obtained to make the total probability equal to unity
by choosing 0 < ω = E[w(X, β)] < ∞. The random variable Xw is called the weighted
version of X, and its distribution is related to that of X. The distribution of Xw is called the
weighted distribution with weight function w. Note that the weight function w(x, β) need not
lie between zero and one, and actually may exceed unity. For example, when w(x; β) = x, in
which case X ∗ = Xw is called the size-biased version of X. The distribution of X ∗ is called
the size-biased distribution with pdf f ∗ (x; θ) = xf (x;θ)
, where 0 < µ = E[X] < ∞. The pdf
µ
∗
f is called the length-biased or size-biased version of f, and the corresponding observational
mechanism is called length-biased or size-biased sampling. Weighted distributions have seen
much use as a tool in the selection of appropriate models for observed data drawn without a
proper frame. In many situations the model given above is appropriate, and the statistical
problems that arise are the determination of a suitable weight function, w(x; β), and drawing
inferences on θ. Appropriate statistical modeling helps accomplish unbiased inference in spite
of the biased data and, at times, even provides a more informative and economic setup. See
Rao (1965), Patel and Rao (1978), Oluyede (1999), Nanda and Jain (1999), Gupta and
Keating (1985) and references therein for a comprehensive review and additional details on
weighted distributions.
Motivated by various applications of Pareto distribution in several areas including reliability, exponential tilting (weighting) in finance and actuarial sciences, as well as in economics,
we construct and present some statistical properties of a new class of generalized Pareto-type
distribution called the Weighted Feller-Pareto (WFP) distribution.
The aim of this paper is to propose and study a generalization of the Pareto distribution
via the weighted Feller-Pareto distribution, and obtain a larger class of flexible parametric
models with applications in reliability, actuarial science, economics, finance and telecommunications. This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 contains some utility notions and
basic results. The weighted Feller-Pareto distribution is introduced in section 2, including
the cumulative distribution function (cdf), pdf, hazard and reverse hazard functions and
monotonicity properties. In section 3, moments of the WFP distribution are presented. The
WEIGHTED FELLER-PARETO DISTRIBUTION
3
mean, variance, standard deviation, coefficients of variation, skewness, and kurtosis are readily obtained from the moments. Section 4 contains measures of uncertainty including Renyi,
Shannon and s−entropies of the distribution. Some concluding remarks are given in section
5.
2. The Weighted Feller-Pareto Class of Distributions
In this section, the weighted Feller-Pareto class of distributions is presented. First, we
discuss the Feller-Pareto distribution, its properties and some sub-models. Some sub-models
of the FP distribution are given in Table 1 below.
2.1. Feller-Pareto Distribution. In this section, we take a close look at a more general
form of the Pareto distribution called the Feller-Pareto distribution which traces it’s root
back to Feller (1971).
Definition 2.1. The Feller-Pareto distribution called FP distribution for short, is defined
as the distribution of the random variable Y = µ + θ(X −1 − 1)γ , where X follows a beta
distribution with parameters α and β, θ > 0 and γ > 0, that is, Y ∼ F P (µ, θ, γ, α, β) if the
pdf of Y is of the form
β −1 1 −(α+β)
1
y−µ γ
y−µ γ
(3)
fF P (y; µ, θ, γ, α, β) =
,
1+
B(α, β)θγ
θ
θ
for −∞ < µ < ∞, α > 0, β > 0, θ > 0, γ > 0, and y > µ, where B(α, β) = Γ(α)Γ(β)
.
Γ(α+β)
The transformed beta (TB) distribution is a special case of the FP distribution. The pdf
of the transformed beta distribution is given by
(4)
fT BD (x; θ, γ, α, β) =
1
γ(x/θ)γβ
,
B(α, β)x [1 + (x/θ)γ ]α+β
x ≥ 0.
Therefore, from (4), T B(θ, γ, α, β) = F P (0, θ, 1/γ, α, β). The family of Pareto distributions
(Pareto I to Pareto IV) can be readily obtained for specified values of the parameters µ, θ,
γ, α, and β.
Table 1. Some Sub-Models of the FP Distribution
Family name
Symbol
F P (I)
F P (y; µ, θ, 1, α, 1)
F P (II)
F P (y; µ, θ, 1, α, 1)
F P (III)
F P (y; µ, θ, γ, 1, 1)
F P (IV )
F P (y; µ, θ, γ, α, 1)
Density function
γ1 −(α+1)
y−µ γ1 −1
1
1 + y−µ
( θ )
B(α,1)θ
θ
γ1 −1 γ1 −(α+1)
y−µ
1
1 + y−µ
B(α,1)θ
θ
θ
γ1 −1 γ1 −2
y−µ
1
1 + y−µ
θγ
θ
θ
γ1 −1 γ1 −(α+1)
y−µ
1
1 + y−µ
B(α,1)θγ
θ
θ
4
ODUBOTE AND OLUYEDE
2.2. Moments of Feller-Pareto Distribution. The k th moment of the random variable
Y −µ
under FP distribution is given by:
θ
Y −µ
E
θ
Let
y−µ
θ
γ1
=
Y −µ
E
θ
k
∞
=
µ
t
,
1−t
k
Z
k+ βγ −1 1 −(α+β)
1
y−µ
y−µ γ
1+
dy.
B(α, β)θγ
θ
θ
0 < t < 1, then dy = θγ
t
1−t
γ−1
dt
,
(1−t)2
and
γ(k+ βγ −1) −(α+β) γ−1
1
θγ
t
t
dt
=
1−t
1−t
(1 − t)2
0 B(α, β)θγ 1 − t
Z 1
1
tkγ+β−1 (1 − t)α−kγ−1 dt
=
B(α, β) 0
Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)
=
,
Γ(α)Γ(β)
Z
1
for k = 0, 1, ...., α − kγ 6= 0, −1, −2, ...., and α − kγ > 0. If µ = 0, then the k th moment
reduces to
θk Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)
E(Y k ) =
,
Γ(α)Γ(β)
for
−β
γ
< k < αγ . Note that if µ = 0 and θ = 1, then we have,
E(Y k ) =
Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)
,
Γ(α)Γ(β)
k = 0, 1, 2, ...., α − kγ 6= 0, −1, −2, ..... The mean, variance, coefficient of variation (cv),
coefficient of skewness (cs) and coefficient of kurtosis (ck) of the Feller-Pareto distribution
(when µ = 0) are given by
µF P =
σF2 P
CVF P
θΓ(γ + β)Γ(α − γ)
,
Γ(α)Γ(β)
2
θ2 Γ(2γ + β)Γ(α − 2γ)
θΓ(γ + β)Γ(α − γ)
=
−
,
Γ(α)Γ(β)
Γ(α)Γ(β)
r
2
θ2 Γ(2γ+β)Γ(α−2γ)
θΓ(γ+β)Γ(α−γ)
p
−
Γ(α)Γ(β)
Γ(α)Γ(β)
σF2 P
=
,
=
θΓ(γ+β)Γ(α−γ)
µF P
Γ(α)Γ(β)
3
2
3
E(Y ) − 3µσ − µ
,
σ3
E(Y 4 ) − 4µE(Y ) + 6µ2 E(Y 2 ) − 4µ3 E(Y ) + µ4
=
,
σ4
CSF P =
CKF P
p
where µ = µF P , σ = σF2 P , E(Y 3 ) = Γ(3γ+β)Γ(α−3γ)
and E(Y 4 ) =
Γ(α)Γ(β)
(1983), Luceno (2006) and references therein.
Γ(4γ+β)Γ(α−4γ)
.
Γ(α)Γ(β)
See Arnold
WEIGHTED FELLER-PARETO DISTRIBUTION
5
2.3. Weighted Feller-Pareto Distribution. In this section, we present the weighted
Feller-Pareto (WFP) distribution. Some WFP sub-models are also presented in this section. Table 2 contains the pdfs of the sub-models for the WFP distribution. First, consider
the weight function w(y; k) = y k . The WFP pdf fW F P (y), when µ = 0 and β = 1, is given
by
γ1 −α−1
k+ γ1 −1 y k fF P (y)
y
Γ(α + 1)
y
fW F P (y) =
1+
,
=
k
E(Y )
θγΓ(1 + kγ)Γ(α − kγ) θ
θ
−1
γ
< k < αγ . The length-biased (k = 1) Feller-Pareto (LBFP) pdf is
γ1 −α−1
γ1 y
y
Γ(α + 1)
1+
,
fLBF P (y) =
θγΓ(1 + γ)Γ(α − γ) θ
θ
k
y−µ
for γ < α and µ = 0. In general, with the weight function w(y; µ, θ, k) =
, we obtain
θ
for
the WFP pdf as:
k+ βγ −1 1 −(α+β)
y−µ γ
y−µ
Γ(α)Γ(β)
1+
,
(5)
fW F P (y) =
Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)B(α, β)θγ
θ
θ
for k = 0, 1, 2, ....; y > µ, α − kγ 6= 0, −1, −2, ......., and α − kγ > 0. The cdf of WFP
distribution is given by:
k+ βγ −1
x−µ
Z y
θ
Γ(α + β)
F (y; α, β, µ, γ, θ, k) =
γ1 α+β dx
0 θγΓ(β + kγ)Γ(α − kγ)
x−µ
1+
θ
y−µ (1/γ)
(
)
Γ(α + β)B [1+( θy−µ )(1/γ) ] ; kγ + β, α + γ − kγ
θ
(6)
=
Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)
Rt
for α−kγ 6= 0, −1, −2, ......, α+γ−kγ 6= 0, −1, −2, ......, where B(t; a, b) = 0 y a−1 (1−y)b−1 dy
is the incomplete beta function. The plots of the pdf and cdf of the WFP distribution in
Figures 1 and 2 suggest that the additional parameters k controls the shape and tail weight
of the distribution.
Figure 1. PDF of the Weighted Feller-Pareto with k=1 and different values of k
6
ODUBOTE AND OLUYEDE
Figure 2. CDF of the Weighted Feller-Pareto with k=1 and different values of k
Table 2. Sub-Models of the WFP Distribution
Family
name
W P (I)
W P (II)
Symbol
Density function
F P (θ, θ, 1, α, 1, k)
Γ(α)
Γ(kγ+1)Γ(α−k)B(α,1)θ
F P (µ, θ, 1, α, , k)
Γ(α)
Γ(kγ+1)Γ(α−k)B(α,1)θ
1+
1+
y−µ
θ
F P (µ, θ, γ, 1, 1, k)
y−µ
θ
−(α+1)
−(α+1)
γ1 −2
1+
y−µ
θ
γ1 −(α+1)
γ1 −1
y−µ
θ
F P (µ, θ, γ, α, 1, k)
Γ(kγ+1)Γ(1−kγ)B(1,1)θγ
W P (IV )
y−θ
θ
γ1 −1
W P (III)
Γ(α+1) 1+
Γ(kγ+1)Γ(α−kγ)θγ
y−µ
θ
2.4. Hazard and Reverse Hazard Functions. In this section, hazard and reverse hazard
functions of the WFP distribution are presented. Graphs of the hazard function for selected
values of the model parameters are also given. The hazard and reverse hazard functions are
given by:
hF (y; k, α, β, µ, γ, θ, k) =
f (y; α, β, µ, γ, θ, k)
1 − F (y; α, β, µ, γ, θ, k)
k+ βγ −1 Γ(α+β)
θγΓ(β+kγ)Γ(α−kγ)
=
1−
Γ(α+β)
B
Γ(kγ+β)Γ(α−kγ)
y−µ
θ
1+
( y−µ
)(1/γ)
θ
y−µ
θ
γ1 −α−β
; kγ + β, α + γ − kγ
[1+( y−µ )(1/γ) ]
θ
WEIGHTED FELLER-PARETO DISTRIBUTION
7
and
τF (y; α, β, µ, γ, θ, k) =
f (y; α, β, µ, γ, θ, k)
F (y; α, β, µ, γ, θ, k)
k+ βγ −1 γ1 −α−β
y−µ
1+
θ
y−µ (1/γ)
,
( θ )
Γ(α+β)
B
;
kγ
+
β,
α
+
γ
−
kγ
Γ(kγ+β)Γ(α−kγ)
[1+( y−µ )(1/γ) ]
Γ(α+β)
θγΓ(β+kγ)Γ(α−kγ)
=
y−µ
θ
θ
for α − kγ 6= 0, −1, −2, ......, α + γ − kγ 6= 0, −1, −2, ......., respectively. Graphs of the WFP
hazard rate function for selected values of the model parameters are given in Figure 3. The
graphs shows unimodal and upside down bathtub shapes.
Figure 3. Hazard function of the Weighted Feller-Pareto with k=0 and different values of k
2.5. Monotonicity Properties. In this section, monotonicity properties of the WFP distribution are presented. The log of the WFP pdf is given by:
ln(fW F P (y)) = n log Γ(α + β) − n log Γ(kγ + β) − n log Γ(α − kγ) − n log θγ
1 β
y−µ
y−µ γ
+
+ k − 1 log
− (α + β) log 1 +
.
γ
θ
θ
Now differentiating ln(fW F P (y)) with respect to y, we have
k−1+
∂lnfW F P (y)
=
∂y
y−µ
β
γ
γ1 −1
y−µ
(α + β) θ
−
γ1 ,
y−µ
γθ 1 +
θ
8
ODUBOTE AND OLUYEDE
and solving for y, we have
∂lnfW F P (y; θ, γ, α, β, k)
=0⇒y=θ
∂y
γ − β − kγ
kγ − γ − α
γ
+ µ.
Note that
∂lnfW F P (y; θ, γ, α, β, k)
< 0 ⇐⇒ y > θ
∂y
γ − β − kγ
kγ − γ − α
γ
+ µ,
and
γ
∂lnfW F P (y; θ, γ, α, β, k)
γ − β − kγ
> 0 ⇐⇒ y < θ
+ µ.
∂y
kγ − γ − α
γ
γ−β−kγ
+ µ.
The mode of the WFP distribution is given by y0 = θ kγ−γ−α
3. Moments of WFP Distribution
Recall that the k th moment of the random variable Y −µ
under the FP distribution are
θ
given by
k
Y −µ
Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)
E
,
=
θ
Γ(α)Γ(β)
for k = 0, 1, ...., α − kγ 6= 0, −1, −2, ...., α − kγ > 0. Now, we derive the rth moments of the
random variable Y −µ
under WFP distribution. This is given by
θ
Y −µ
E
θ
Let
y−µ
θ
γ1
=
r
t
,
1−t
Y −µ
E
θ
Z
µ
0 < t < 1, then dy = θγ
r
=
=
t
1−t
γ−1
dt
,
(1−t)2
and
γ(r+k+ βγ −1)
Γ(α)Γ(β)θγ
t
Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)B(α, β)θγ 1 − t
0
−(α+β) γ−1
t
t
1
1+
dt
1−t
1−t
(1 − t)2
Z 1
Γ(α)Γ(β)
trγ+kγ+β−1 (1 − t)α−rγ−kγ−1 dt
Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)B(α, β) 0
Γ(rγ + kγ + β)Γ(α − rγ − kγ)
,
Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)
Z
=
r+k+ βγ −1
Γ(α)Γ(β)
γ1 (α+β) dy.
Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)B(α, β)θγ 1 + y−µ
θ
×
(7)
∞
=
y−µ
θ
1
for α − kγ 6= 0, −1, −2, ......, α − rγ 6= 0, −1, −2, ......, α − γ(r + k) 6= 0, −1, −2, ......, r =
0, 1, 2, ..... The mean, variance, coefficients of variation (cv), skewness (cs) and kurtosis (ck)
can be readily obtained from equation (7).
WEIGHTED FELLER-PARETO DISTRIBUTION
9
4. Measures of Uncertainty for the Weighted Feller-Pareto Distribution
The concept of entropy was introduced by Shannon (1948) in the nineteenth century.
During the last couple of decades a number of research papers have extended Shannon’s
original work. Among them are Park (1995), Renyi (1961) who developed a one-parameter
extension of Shannon entropy. Wong and Chen (1990) provided some results on Shannon
entropy for order statistics. The concept of entropy plays a vital role in information theory.
The entropy of a random variable is defined in terms of its probability distribution and can
be shown to be a good measure of randomness or uncertainty. In this section, we present
Renyi entropy, Shannon entropy and s−entropy for the WFP distribution.
4.1. Shannon Entropy. Shannon entropy (1948) for a continuous random variable Y with
WFP pdf fW F P (y) is defined as
Z ∞
(8)
E(− log(fW F P (Y ))) =
(− log(fW F P (y)))fW F P (y)dy.
µ
Note that
Γ(α + β)
−log(fW F P (y)) = −log
+ logΓ(α) + logΓ(β) − logΓ(kγ + β)
Γ(α)Γ(β)θγ
β
y−µ
− logΓ(α − kγ) + k + − 1 log
γ
θ
γ1 y−µ
− (α + β)log 1 +
.
θ
Now, Shannon entropy for the weighted Feller-Pareto distribution is
Γ(α + β)
E(−logfW F P (Y )) = −log
+ logΓ(α) + logΓ(β) − logΓ(kγ + β)
Γ(α)Γ(β)θγ
β
Y −µ
− logΓ(α − kγ) + k + − 1 E log
γ
θ
γ1 Y −µ
(9)
− (α + β)E log 1 +
.
θ
y−µ
θ
γ1
t
Now, with the substitution
= 1−t
for 0 < t < 1, we can readily obtain both
γ1 Y −µ
Y −µ
E log θ
and E log 1+ θ
, so that Shannon entropy for the WFP distribution
is given by
(10)
E(−logfW F P (Y )) = −logB(α, β) + log(θγ) + Γ(α) + Γ(β) − logΓ(kγ + β)
− logΓ(α − kγ) + (kγ + β − γ)[ψ(β) − ψ(α)]
− (α + β)(ψ(α) − ψ(α + β)),
0
where ψ(.) =
Γ (.)
Γ(.)
is the digamma function.
10
ODUBOTE AND OLUYEDE
4.2. s-Entropy for Weighted Feller-Pareto Distribution. The s-entropy of the WFP
distribution is defined as

R∞ s
 1
1 − µ fW F P (y)dy , if s 6= 1, s > 0,
s−1
Hs (fW F P ) =

E(−logfW F P (Y )),
if s = 1.
Note that
Z
k+ βγ −1
Γ(α)Γ(β)
y−µ
=
Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)B(α, β)θγ
θ
µ
µ
1
−(α+β) s
y−µ γ
dy,
× 1+
θ
γ1
γ−1
y−µ
t
t
dt
and using the substitution
= 1−t for 0 < t < 1, so that dy = θγ 1−t
, we
θ
(1−t)2
∞
s
fW
F P (y)dy
Z
∞
get
Z
µ
∞
s
fW
F P (y)dy
s
1
k+β−γ
γ+α−k
θγtγ−1 (1 − t)−γ−1 dt
t
(1 − t)
=
B(α,
β)θγ
0
[Γ(α + β)]s Γ(ks + sβ − sγ + γ)Γ(sα − ks + sγ − γ)
= (θγ)1−s
,
[Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)]s Γ(sβ + sα)
Z 1
(11)
for s > 0, s 6= 1. Consequently, s-entropy for the WFP distribution is given by
s
1
1−s [Γ(α + β)] Γ(ks + sβ − sγ + γ)Γ(sα − ks + sγ − γ)
1 − (θγ)
,
Hs (fW F P ) =
s−1
[Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)]s Γ(sβ + sα)
for s > 0, s 6= 1, α−kγ 6= 0, −1, −2, ..., sα+sγ −ks−γ 6= 0, −1, −2, ...., ks+sβ −sγ +γ > 0,
and sα − ks + sγ − γ > 0.
4.3. Renyi Entropy. Renyi entropy (1961) for the WFP distribution is presented in this
section. Note that Renyi entropy is given by
Z ∞
1
s
log
(fW F P (x)) dx , s > 0, s 6= 1.
(12)
HR (fW F P ) =
1−s
µ
From equation (10), we obtain Renyi entropy as follows:
1
[Γ(α + β)]s Γ(ks + sβ − sγ + γ)Γ(sα − ks + sγ − γ)
HR (fW F P ) =
log
,
1−s
(θγ)s−1 [Γ(kγ + β)Γ(α − kγ)]s Γ(sβ + sα)
for s > 0, s 6= 1, α−kγ 6= 0, −1, −2, ..., sα+sγ −ks−γ 6= 0, −1, −2, ...., ks+sβ −sγ +γ > 0,
and sα − ks + sγ − γ > 0.
5. Concluding Remarks
In this paper, a new six-parameter class of distributions called weighted Feller-Pareto
(WFP) distribution is constructed and studied. The pdf, cdf, hazard and reverse hazard
functions, monotonicity properties are presented. Measures of uncertainty including Renyi,
Shannon and s-entropies are derived.
WEIGHTED FELLER-PARETO DISTRIBUTION
11
Table 3. Shannon and s-entropies of the sub-models of the FP distribution
Family
name
Shannon entropy
P (I)
P (II)
P (III)
P (IV )
Γ(α+1)
θ
s-entropy
−Γ(α)−1+(α+1)(ψ(α)−
log
ψ(α+ 1)) log Γ(α+1)
− Γ(α) − 1 + (α +
θ
1)(ψ(α)
ψ(α + 1))
−
Γ(2)
log θγ − 2 + 2(ψ(1) − ψ(2))
Γ(α+1)
log θγ −Γ(α)−1−(1−γ)[ψ(1)−
1
s−1
[Γ(α+1)]s Γ(s+αs−1)
∗ 1 − θ Γ(α)s Γ(s+αs)
1
s−1
[Γ(α+1)]s Γ(s+αs−γ)
∗ 1 − θ Γ(α)s Γ(s+αs)
1−s Γ(s−γs+γ)Γ(γs+s−γ)
∗ 1 − θγ
Γ(2s)
1−s
s
θγ
[α] Γ(s−γs+γ)Γ(γs+αs−γ)
1
∗ 1−
s−1
Γ(s+αs)
1
s−1
ψ(α)] + (α + 1)(ψ(α) − ψ(α + 1))
Table 4. Shannon and s-entropies of the WFP Distribution
Family name
W P (I)
Shannon entropy
s-entropy
s Γ(ks+1)Γ(sα−ks+s−1)
1
logB(α, 1)+log(θ)−Γ(α)−1+logΓ(k+ s−1
1 − θ [Γ(α+1)]
s
s
Γ(k+1) Γ(α−k) Γ(s+sα)
1) + logΓ(α − k) − k[ψ(1) − ψ(α)] + (α +
1)(ψ(α) − ψ(α + 1))
s
Γ(ks+1)Γ(sα−ks+s−1)
1 − θ [Γ(α+1)]
Γ(k+1)s Γ(α−k)s Γ(s+sα)
W P (II)
logB(α, 1)+log(θ)−Γ(α)−1+logΓ(k+
1) + logΓ(α − k) − k[ψ(1) − ψ(α)] + (α +
1)(ψ(α) − ψ(α + 1))
1
s−1
W P (III)
logB(1, 1)+log(θγ)−2+logΓ(kγ +1)+
logΓ(1−kγ)−(kγ+1−γ)[ψ(1)−ψ(1)]+
2(ψ(1) − ψ(2))
1
s−1
1−
W P (IV )
logB(α, 1) + log(θγ) − Γ(α) − 1 +
logΓ(kγ + 1) + logΓ(α − kγ) − (kγ + 1 −
γ)[ψ(1)−ψ(α)]+(α+1)(ψ(α)−ψ(α+1))
1
s−1
1
θγ 1−s Γ(ksγ+γ)Γ(s−ksγ+s−γ)
Γ(kγ+1)s Γ(1−kγ)s Γ(2s)
[Γ(α+1)]s Γ(ksγ+γ)Γ(sα−ksγ+s−γ)
θγ s−1 Γ(kγ+1)s Γ(α−kγ)s Γ(s+sα)
−
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
Arnold, B. C., Pareto Distributions, International Cooperative Publishing House, Fairland, Maryland,
(1983).
Brazauskas, V., Fisher Information Matrix for the Feller-Pareto Distribution, Statistics and Probability
Letters, 59, 159-167, (2002).
Block, H.W., and Savits, T.H., The Reverse Hazard Function, Probability in the Engineering and
Informational Sciences,12, 69-90 (1998).
Chandra, N.K. and Roy, D., Some Results on Reverse Hazard Rate, Probability in the Engineering and
Information Sciences, 15, 95-102 (2001).
Feller, W., An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Vol. 2, 2nd Edition, Wiley, New
York, (1971).
Gupta, C. and Keating, P., Relations for Reliability Measures Under Length Biased Sampling, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 13(1), 49 - 56, (1985).
Luceno, A., Fitting the Generalized Pareto Distribution to Data using Maximum Goodness-of Fit Estimators, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51, 2, 904-917, (2006).
Nanda, K. and Jain, K., Some Weighted Distribution Results on Univariate and Bivariate Cases, Journal
of Statistical Planning and Inference, 77(2), 169 - 180, (1999).
12
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
ODUBOTE AND OLUYEDE
Oluyede, O., On Inequalities and Selection of Experiments for Length-Biased Distributions, Probability
in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 13(2), 129 - 145, (1999).
Park, S., The Entropy of Continuous Probability Distributions, IEEE Transactions of Information Theory, 41, 2003 - 2007, (1995).
Patil, P., Encountered Data, Statistical Ecology, Environmental Statistics, and Weighted Distribution
Methods, Environmetrics, 2(4), 377 - 423, (1991).
Patil, P. and Rao, R., Weighted Distributions and Size-Biased Sampling with Applications to Wildlife
and Human Families, Biometrics, 34(6), 179 - 189, (1978).
Riabi, M.Y.A., Bordazaran, G. R. M. and Yari, G. H., β - Entropy for Pareto-type Distributions and
Related Weighted Distributions, Statistics and Probability Letters, 80, 1512-1519 (2010).
Rao, R., On Discrete Distributions Arising out of Methods of Ascertainment, The Indian Journal of
Statistics, 27(2), 320 - 332, (1965).
Renyi, A., On Measures of Entropy and Information, Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics
and Probability, 1(1), 547 - 561, (1960).
Rizzo, M., New Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Pareto Distributions, Astin Bulletin, 39(2), 691-715, (2009).
Shannon, E., A Mathematical Theory of Communication, The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(10),
379 - 423, (1948).
Wong, K.M, Chen,S., The entropy of ordered sequences and order statistics, IEEE Transactions of
information Theory, 36, 276 - 284, (1990).
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA
30460, United States