Download Overview of the Behaviorist Approach

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Social Bonding and Nurture Kinship wikipedia , lookup

Subfields of psychology wikipedia , lookup

Educational psychology wikipedia , lookup

Symbolic behavior wikipedia , lookup

Neuroeconomics wikipedia , lookup

Thin-slicing wikipedia , lookup

Observational methods in psychology wikipedia , lookup

Insufficient justification wikipedia , lookup

Social psychology wikipedia , lookup

Applied behavior analysis wikipedia , lookup

Learning theory (education) wikipedia , lookup

Verbal Behavior wikipedia , lookup

Theory of planned behavior wikipedia , lookup

History of psychology wikipedia , lookup

Experimental psychology wikipedia , lookup

Cross-cultural psychology wikipedia , lookup

Behavioral modernity wikipedia , lookup

Theory of reasoned action wikipedia , lookup

Vladimir J. Konečni wikipedia , lookup

Conservation psychology wikipedia , lookup

Attribution (psychology) wikipedia , lookup

Behavior analysis of child development wikipedia , lookup

Abnormal psychology wikipedia , lookup

Descriptive psychology wikipedia , lookup

Social cognitive theory wikipedia , lookup

Operant conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup

Behaviorism wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Overview of the Behaviorist Approach
Assumptions:
• Behavior is the only valid data in psychology. Behavior is observable and can therefore
be measured objectively. ‘Objectively’ in this case means in an unbiased way.
•
Subjectivity should be eliminated from psychology. Subjective data is that which
comes from ones own mind and is therefore biased. Introspection is a subjective method that
involves close personal reflection and reporting. Behaviorism rejects introspection as a
method of data collection.
•
Learning can be understood in terms of external causes rather than internal
causes. Environmental influences are seen as the roots for learning and mental activities are
considered useless as data.
•
Behavior is almost entirely determined by the environment. Genetic basis for behavior
are rejected and behavior is seen to be purely learned.
•
Simple stimulus-response associations are the building blocks of all behavior, no
matter how complex.
•
Laws of learning are the same for all species and can be seen in any environment.
Much of the behaviorism research involves experiments with animals.
Key concepts:
• Classical conditioning – This is learning through association. See Pavlov (1927)
• Operant conditioning – This is learning through reinforcement and punishment. See
Skinner (1948)
Methods:
• Laboratory experiments – These are central to the behaviorist approach as only under
laboratory conditions can we “control” the environment. In striving to make psychology a
science Behaviorism obligates the use of scientific/empirical methods. Many such experiments
also investigate non-human animal behavior.
Evaluation:
• (+) Behaviorism has been very influential. Modern psychology still relies heavily on
scientific methods that were first proposed by Watson’s (1913) Behaviorist Manifesto.
• (+) Practical applications. Behaviorism has given rise to numerous therapeutic
applications.
• (-) The approach is seen as mechanistic. Human beings are complex animals, we feel
emotions, we live in complex societies etc. To see humans as functioning in a mechanistic
manner is to over-simplify human behavior.
• (-) It excludes innate factors. We now know that genetic factors do play an enormous role
in influencing human behavior and behaviorism simply does not acknowledge this.
• (-) It is deterministic and reductionist. The approach rejects the notion of free will, that
we actively choose how to behave. Reductionist means that the approach takes complex
behaviors and tries to explain them in simplistic ways (e.g. S-R).
• (-) Based on work with non-human animals. The approach has been criticized for
making generalizations about human beings based on experiments on non-human animals.