Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Diagnosis and Management of a Pediatric Patient with Infantile Nystagmus Authors: Alexandra Talaber O.D., Brian M. Rodrigues O.D., Barry Tannen O.D., F.C.O.V.D, F.A.AO., M.H. Esther Han O.D, F.C.O.V.D, F.A.A.O. Abstract: Guidelines on diagnostic testing for infantile nystagmus, along with optometric treatment modalities to increase visual acuity, binocular stability, and improve cosmesis will be explored. I. Case History: AM is a nine year old Hispanic male referred to the SUNY State College of Optometry University Eye Center at five years of age for the treatment of congenital nystagmus. Symptoms were reported as decreased vision and irregular eye movements. Ocular history is significant for infantile nystagmus, status post nystagmus surgery at seven years of age. AM has bilateral anisometropic refractive amblyopia with two years of OD patching. Medical history is significant for later birth delivery, increased insulin levels at birth resulting in hospitalization, and asthma. Current medication is albuterol rescue inhaler. II. Pertinent findings Entering comprehensive exam from 2008: Habitual Rx: OD +3.00-1.25x005 / OS +4.00-1.50x005; ADD +4.00 Distance VA without correction: OD 20/80, OS 20/100, OU 20/80 Distance VA with correction: OD 20/70, OS 20/80, OU 20/80 Near VA without correction: OD 20/30, OS 20/40, OU 20/30, Near VA with correction: OD 20/100, OS 20/100, OU 20/100 Retinoscopy (variable): OD +4.25-2.00x010 / OS +2.50-1.50x180 EOM: horizontal pendular nystagmus with dampening upon convergence, superior null point, high frequency latent component, Inferior left head tilt Hirschberg reflex: IRXT Accommodation: +1.75 lag OU Fundus examination: No retinal or optic nerve pathology noted III. Differential diagnosis Infantile nystagmus (also termed congenital nystagmus) o Idiopathic (motor pathway or feedback deficit) o Visual input disorder (leber’s congenital amaurosis, cone dystrophy, congenital stationary night blindness, optic nerve hypoplasia/atrophy, anterior segment or media opacity, ocular albinism) o Neurological Spasmus Nutans o Onset typically between 5 months and 3 years of age o Spontaneous resolution between 2 and 8 years of age o Varied presentation with different nystagmoid patterns and directions but typically small frequency and low amplitude o Normal fundus examination and normal imaging studies o Typically does not require treatment, not pathological entity Acquired Nystagmus o Due to disease process, trauma or neurological complication; typically after infantile period o Characteristically due to vestibular pathway pathology o Imaging studies of cranium, orbit or auditory system, and/or a neurological consult must be performed to rule out or identify pathological entities IV. Diagnosis and discussion Infantile nystagmus is considered a pathological process that can be of an idiopathic origin or associated with other visual disorders such as albinism, retinal disease, low vision and neurological childhood diseases. Nystagmus causes decreased visual acuity due to movement of images away from the foveal area of the retina. The prevalence of nystagmus is reported to be 24/10,000 and the impact of nystagmus is significant. Characteristics: o variable waveform nystagmus, usually horizontal, medium amplitude and frequency, symmetrical o Head tilt, turn, or oscillation o latent component, nystagmus worsens with fixation, (+) null point Tests: ERG, look for high hyperopia (leber’s), myopia and male (X-L congenital stationary night blindness), astigmatism (ocular albinism), low amplitude with high frequency (cone dystrophy) Pediatric populations are at risk for nystagmus due to the susceptibility and fragility of their neurological development. Nystagmus often presents as a significant deterrent to optimal vision and visual performance any may isolate children due to poor performance or cosmesis. Many optometrists find themselves referring their patients with nystagmus because they are uncertain of the proper diagnostic testing and treatment options for this patient population. V. Treatment Vision Therapy –binocularity, suppression control, biofeedback o Patient AM began Vision Therapy at age 6 in 2008 to improve oculomotor skills, accommodative insufficiency and convergence excess. Distance VA (DVA) with correction OU was 20/80 at the start of therapy. After 40 sessions DVA OU was measured at 20/100, although accommodative amplitudes and binocularity were improved to above normal and the patient was graduated due to immaturity for biofeedback training at the time. AM began biofeedback therapy at age 8, completed 8 sessions in 2010 and was dismissed thereafter due to time constraints and scheduling conflicts. AM returned to the clinic in January 2012; Entering DVA with correction OU was 20/70. DVA with correction OU was 20/30 after 6 months of biofeedback therapy. Readalyzer™ fixation recordings were performed throughout to measure improvements in fixation. These recordings show a marked reduction in nystagmus amplitude and frequency, along with reduced convergence for an extended time period compared with initial reading. AM is continuing biofeedback therapy weekly, including some oculomotor and visualmotor skills. Subjective improvements are pronounced since starting biofeedback therapy along with visual skills therapy, along with measureable improvement in visual acuity over time. Due to increase in frequency of nystagmoid movements under monocular conditions, therapy was performed binocularity in order to provide the greatest amount of oculomotor control and least amount of retinal slip. Biofeedback: research supports reduction of amplitude of nystagmus and frequency (to a lesser extent) with the use of auditory biofeedback therapy. Kirschen demonstrated improved visual acuity and contrast sensitivity during the technique. All patients report subjective improvement after VT. Explanation of auditory feedback Visagraph readings from 1/5/12 and 4/12/12 (see below). Interpretation and additional recordings will be present in final presentation or poster. o Table 1. Visual acuity over time Date 6/11/2008 7/15/2008 9/16/2008 (began VT) 1/20/2009 3/24/2009 9/15/2009 3/9/2010 (s/p surgery) 1/5/12 3/15/2012 (start of biofeedback therapy) 7/12/2012 7/19/12 8/30/12 DVA OU 20/80 20/200 20/80 20/50 20/60+2 20/100 20/80 20/70+1 20/60-1 20/40 (near) 20/30+1 (near) 20/25 (near) 20/40+1 Prism o BO to increase convergence or yoked prism to alter visual direction. o AM was given varying degrees of vertical prism in the range of 15-9 base down in order to elevate primary gaze to a superior position in order to attempt to bring AM gaze towards his null point. Father reported initial decrease in head tilt with regression in 1-2 months of wearing prismatic correction upon examination. Surgical o AM underwent combined nystagmus and strabismus surgery in February 2010. Immediately following surgery, DVA without correction were OD and OS 20/100, OU 20/80. Father reported improvement in head tilt and eye movements initially but nystagmus regressed over the period of one year with return in head tilt downward. Other treatment options: o Rigid gas permeable contact lenses o Pharmacological, CNS depressants o Botulinum toxin injections VI. Conclusion Careful case history to review age of onset, severity, previous treatments, family history of condition. Rule out any neurological or pathological conditions that may manifest with nystagmus Attempt to achieve best correctable visual acuity by first documenting binocular VA and allowing patient to assume habitual head posture (examining at null point) Correct any refractive error with spectacles: Binocular refraction preferred by fogging one eye when refracting fellow eye to minimize effects of latent component Careful documentation of nystagmus eye movements such as fast and slow phase direction, conjugation, amplitude, frequency, effect of convergence and positions of gaze and latency. Treat any amblyopia if present Attempt to align primary gaze with null point with use of prism Improve any additional deficits that may impede academic learning such as accommodative deficiencies, saccadic and pursuit deficiencies and abnormal binocularity. Perform Biofeedback training via visual, auditory or oculomotor awareness therapy to improve intrapersonal cognizance and control of ocular deviations and oscillations. Resources: Dell’Osso, L.F., and Z.I. Wang. Extraocular proprioception and new treatments for infantile nystagmus syndrome (2008). Progress in Brain Research, Vol 171, pp. 67-75. Hertle, Richard W. Nystagmus in Infancy and Childhood (2008). Seminars in Ophthalmology, 23:307-317. Mclean and Gottlob. An Update on Nystagmus (2012). Advances in Clinical Neuroscience & Rehabilitation Neuro-ophthamology Series. Vol 11: 6, pp. 17-18. Sharma, P., Tandon, R., Kumar, S., and S. Anand. Reduction of congenital nystagmus amplitude with auditory biofeedback (2000). Journal of AAPOS. Vol 4:5, pp. 287-290. Tao and Flickinger. How to Assess and Treat Infantile Nystagmus (2012). Ophthalmic Pearls: Neuro-Ophthalmology. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 29 Aug. 2012 http://www.aao.org/publications/eyenet/200511/pearls.cfm Biofeedback Recordings using Readalyzer™ Initial Recordings performed 1/15/2012 Mid Therapy Recordings performed 4/12/2012