Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Kristin Humerfelt, Ass. Professor /PhD-candidate University of Stavanger N-4036 Stavanger Norway Service users as important participants to make innovative actions in social work practice -a co-operative inquire research project between practitioners in a Norwegian municipal social service agency, service users with drug/ alcohol problems and employed at a university of Norway The aim for the paper The aim for this paper is to discuss factors that are essential for organizing an collaborative methodical process that opens for the informant’s (practitioners and service users) lifeworld and enable the creation and development of knowledge that result in innovative actions in social work practice. Background The paper is founded in a research entitled: Individual plan – a useful tool for service users with drug related problems? -with focus at users perspective. An individual plan is legally established by the Norwegian government by 2001. It is a type of contract that service users with compound and long lasting needs for health- and social services can agree to establish in collaboration with health- and social services. The statuary provision gives first of all service users the rights to receive an individual plan to organize their health- and social services requirements. Secondly it gives the service users the right to collaborate and to be involved in the making and in the following-up care of the plan. Third it gives the duty to practitioners to enable for users involvement. The aim for the individual plan is to give service users coordinated, holistic and individual customized health- and social services. In this research the service users are people with drug related problems. The aim of the research is to contribute with solutions for best practice, based at knowledge about the conditions that contribute to the success or failure of reaching the goal of coordinated, holistic and individually customised health- and social services to service users with drug/alcohol problems - and with a user involvement perspective. The research questions The main question is: Is individual plan a useful tool to help social- and health service users with drug/alcohol problems? With sub questions: Do service users and practitioners experience that individual plan lead to coordinated, holistic and individual customized health- and social services? What do the service users experience as promoting or restraining their possibilities to involve in the process of making and follow-up care of the individual plan? What do the practitioners experience as promoting or restraining their possibilities to enable for users involvement in the process of making and follow-up care of the individual plan? What is challenging in the work with individual plan with services users with drug related problems? Interest It is of interest to find out if individual plan is or how it can be a useful tool to help people with drug/alcohol problems, because studies show that the numbers of Norwegian people with drug related problems are increasing, at the same time as studies show that they have low status in western society that lead to often marginalized and badly prioritized in the access of health- and social services (Fekjær 2004). Theoretical grounding and methodical approach: The research is theoretical grounded in subjective epistemology and social constructivism where reality and knowledge is seen as constructed by people in interaction and influenced by their historical, cultural and social context. Reality is therefore unique, subjective but might in some degree also bee intersubjective among people that share context. The theoretical grounding is first of all shown in the way the research is based on questions that are open for how the informants experience their ‘lifeworld’, a world that are unique, subjective and numerous, - instead of seeking to verify the researchers hypothesis. Secondly the theoretical grounding is shown in the choice of quality methods inspired by Peter Reasons (1988) “Co-operative inquiry”. A method that opened for collaboration among service users, practitioners and a scientist in an open ended hermeneutic- phenomenological process, that was marked by the enterprise- were all participants in some degree took part as co-researchers. All participated in deciding on what to be looked at, the methods of inquiry, and making sense of what was found out, and contributed to the action that after some time was evaluated. It was a process where all that happened were results of dialogs between service users, practitioners and scientist. The challenge in a process like this is to organize an process that stimulates all partners to participate and enable a creative and confident culture that develop useful and knowledge that can result in innovative solutions. The practitioners, the service users and scientist were emphasized to be as equal and mutual as possible in their work of partnership. The knowledge of experience, of practice and of science were considered of equal value, although they are different and unique. The importance of the partners’ consciousness about the complementary and the dependency that lies between the three types of knowledge was stressed in the dialogue. The research process’ imminent proximity to the practitioners and service users ’lifeworld, real-context and real-social-work-cases were seen as the core to develop sustainable knowledge. The results of this research show the importance of including the service users in the methodical process -not only the practitioners, but also the service users with drug/alcohol problems as partners, as co - researchers -to be able to develop a process that enable to create knowledge that contribute with innovative solutions for improving social work practice.