Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Business cycle wikipedia , lookup
Economics of fascism wikipedia , lookup
Participatory economics wikipedia , lookup
Greg Mankiw wikipedia , lookup
Production for use wikipedia , lookup
Democratic socialism wikipedia , lookup
Authoritarian socialism wikipedia , lookup
Welfare capitalism wikipedia , lookup
Market socialism wikipedia , lookup
Economic calculation problem wikipedia , lookup
The End of Laissez-Faire: Macroeconomic Instability and Microeconomic Inefficiency Peter J. Boettke Econ 881/Spring 2005 14 February Historical Context Turn of the Century America Poverty Amidst Plenty Progressive Era Legislation Antitrust policy Interpretation of Imperialism and War Socialism Capitalism as cause, socialism as solution Great Depression Aggregate demand failure (underconsumption) New Deal Legislation Exploitation WWI consumer protection from impure products Working Conditions cut-throat competition Pure Food and Drug Act inequality Putting people to work and giving them hope WWII “Greatest Generation” Importance of the Soviet Union Socialism as a Viable Alternative Socialism tamed by Democracy = Interventionism No monopolistic exploitation and now crisis such as the Great Depression Nothing in the idea of socialist planning is inconsistent with democratic freedom; in fact, in the 1930s it was often argued that socialism was the fulfillment of democracy in economic life. Socialist Reality Orwell --- Animal Farm --- “all animals are equal, just some animals are more equal than others” Why No Socialism in the US? Check your premise 60% of GDP during WWII was government it is hard to argue that your country is not socialist. Nationalization vs. Regulation Regulatory apparatus was established to control capitalist excess Union power to eliminate exploitation See Samuelson, Economics, p. 152-154; 185ff, esp., 186. The Economics of Over Production and Under Consumption Overproduction --- Samuelson, Economics, p. 4. Command and Control for Public Administration --ibid, p. 5. The Fallacy of Composition --- ibid., p. 9. The System as a whole --- ibid, p. 9. “What is true of one of kind of world may be false of another. Similarly, for the modern world of unemployment, the conclusions of the classical or Euclidean economics may not be at all applicable. … The important hard kernel of truth in the older economics of full employment can then be separated from the chaff of misleading applications. Moreover, as we shall see later, if modern economics does its task well so that widespread unemployment is substantially banished from democratic societies, then its (i.e., national income accounting) importance will wither away and the traditional economics (whose concern is wise allocation of fully employed resources) will really come into its own – almost for the first time.” Samuelson, Economics, p. 10. Income Expenditure Keynesianism National Income Accounting Circular Flow and Avoiding Double Counting Aggregate Demand Failure and Depression Economics Final Goods Prices (e.g., bread, flour, wheat) Full employment level of income Savings and Investment Leakage in the system due to liquidity traps, etc. Coordination failure between savers and investors The Determination of Price By Supply and Demand The Logic of Market Clearing The Structure of Perfect Competition Numerous buys and sellers and no control over price Monopoly Non-economic considerations for blocking the price system Complete control over price except as set by government regulation Imperfect and Monopolistic Competition Some control over price See Samuelson, Economics, p. 492. Income Expenditure C, I, G 45o C + I + G1 C + I + Go G Y Yu YF G * 1/1-b = Y Multiplier effect Microeconomic Inefficiency MC AC P P> MC PC Profit max --- MR = MC D = MR Cannot Min AC P Q QC P=MC MC Profit Max – MR=MC D Min AC Q MR Welfare Economics: Market Efficiency and Market Failure Character of General Competitive Equilibrium First Fundamental Welfare Theorem Exchange Efficiency Production Efficiency Product Mix Efficiency An Economy in competitive equilibrium is Pareto Efficient Second Fundamental Welfare Theorem Any Pareto-efficient resource allocation that society desires can be obtained through the market mechanism When Does This Hold? Under conditions of macroeconomic balance and perfect competition. Absent those conditions due to macroinstability, imperfect market structure, or the existence of significant externalities, imperfect information, and/or missing markets (e.g., public goods) and the efficiency properties cannot be achieved. Social Welfare Functions and the Critique of Welfare Economics A 2 SW 1 B Government as corrective device to move from 1 to 2. E.g., StructureConductPerformance Critique of this Idea Inefficiencies are an Illusion Marginal Costs are not appropriately calculated No stable Social Welfare Function Arrow’s theorem and the problems of democratic decision making Costs of transition from one state to another are not fully considered Hayek and the Limits of Agreement Correctives are Worse than the Problem Public Choice concerns with the manner in which government policy will be pursued