Download Large-signal feedback control of a bidirectional coupled

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Public address system wikipedia , lookup

Audio power wikipedia , lookup

Rectifier wikipedia , lookup

Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup

Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Electric power system wikipedia , lookup

History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup

Islanding wikipedia , lookup

Power engineering wikipedia , lookup

Negative feedback wikipedia , lookup

Power inverter wikipedia , lookup

Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup

Television standards conversion wikipedia , lookup

Automation wikipedia , lookup

Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup

Distributed control system wikipedia , lookup

Electronic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Hendrik Wade Bode wikipedia , lookup

Wassim Michael Haddad wikipedia , lookup

Control theory wikipedia , lookup

Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup

Resilient control systems wikipedia , lookup

Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup

HVDC converter wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Control system wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 39, NO. 5, OCTOBER 1992
429
Large-Signal Feedback Control of a
Bidirectional Coupled-Inductor
Cuk Converter
1
Joan Maj6, Luis Martinez, Albert0 Poveda, Luis Garcia de Vicuiia,
Francisco Guinjoan, Antonio F. Shnchez, Max Valentin, and
Jean Claude Marpinard
Abstract-Under conditions of order reduction, a nonlinear
control of a bidirectional coupled-inductor Cuk converter suitable for large-signal applications is presented. The converter is
accurately modeled as a second-order bilinear system and the
conditions established for local controllability. The integration
of converter state equations and the subsequent introduction of
a linear recurrence between the output variable and an external
reference signal lead to a nonlinear control law that is implemented by means of an analog divider, standard operational
amplifiers, and a pulse-width modulator. As a result, the output
variable follows proportionally the reference signal, this allowing the obtention of different types of power waveforms in the
converter output. Experimental results verify the theoretical
predictions.
designing a switching converter-based servosystem using a
variable reference or when, in a conventional regulator, a
load perturbation appears. The dynamical analysis becomes also rather complex in the discontinuous conduction mode where the instant in which the switch current
becomes zero depends on the converter state and not on
its duty cycle. Therefore, two constraints expressing the
current cancellation must be added to the three piecewise-linear vector differential equations. First, the switch
current takes the same value at both the beginning of the
first subinterval and the end of the second one; second,
the switch current is zero during the third subinterval of
the switching period. Moreover, the existence of an additional nonlinearity nonrelated to the control variables but
I. INTRODUCTION
to the converter state variables makes the design of a
WITCHING converters can be represented taking part
feedback loop suitable for large-signal operation particuof a class of feedback systems as illustrated in Fig. 1.
larly difficult. In order to avoid the discontinuous conducThe basic operation of the regulator loop consists in
tion mode and, at the same time, allow the existence of
comparing the output variable with a reference input to
light load levels, the bidirectional switch was introduced,
generate an error signal, which, after being appropriately
this having led to a bilinear description of the switching
filtered and amplified, results in a continuous control
converter [l], [2].
signal. This is eventually transformed by means of a
The transformation of the canonical buck, boost, or
modulator into a discrete variable defining the switch duty
buck-boost structures into bidirectional cells has extended
cycle. The main difficulties in the analysis of switching
the dynamic performances of the power converter as the
regulators are due to the highly nonlinear nature of
time constant of the output filter is strongly affected by
dc-to-dc converter systems.
the low-impedance input network. On one hand, the
To solve this problem, different linearizing modeling
well-known linear control strategies cannot be used in
techniques were proposed in the past, their validity limits
such bidirectional converters since large-signal transients
being located in a small neighborhood of the steady-state
are often present in the current flow reversal. Therefore,
operating point. However, the analysis becomes more
in such converters, large-signal control becomes mandadifficult beyond these limits, when large-signal behavior is
tory, this having to take into account the nonlinearities
required. This case is particularly important either when
introduced by the sampling process as well as the addiManuscript received August 3, 1990; revised March 20, 1992. This tional constraints that are needed to obtain the desired
work has been sponsored by Grant Acci6n Integrada Hispano-Francesa closed-loop regulation. On the other hand, a large-signal
183.
control technique in bidirectional cells has provided excelJ. Maj6, L. Garcia de Vicufia, F. Guinjoan, and A. F. Sinchez are with
the Escuela Universitaria PolitCcnica de Vilanova i la Geltrh, 08800 lent performances in the elementary converters as reVilanova i la Geltrh, Barcelona, Spain.
ported in [l], [2]. This approach is now applied to control
L. Martinez and A. Poveda are with the Escuela TCcnica Superior de a complFx converter such as the bidirectional coupled-inIngenieros de Telecomunicaci6n, Departamento de Ingenieria
ductor Cuk converter, shown in Fig. 2, under conditions of
Electrbnica, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
J. C. Mapinard and M. Valentin are with the Laboratoire d’Automa- order reduction.
tique et d’halyse des Systkmes (L.A.A.S.1-(Centre National de la
In such a converter, a reduction of a fourth two
Recherche Scientifique), UniversitC Paul Sabatier, 31077 Toulouse
second-order
can be achieved if two conditions are fulCedex, France.
IEEE Log Number 9202498.
filled. First, if the magnetic coupling satisfies the matching
S
0278-0046/92$03.00 0 1992 IEEE
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 39, NO. 5, OCTOBER 1992
430
ERROR AYPUFIER
AND
41-
YODUUTOR
J
134
d(t) e
b
POWER 5l'ACE
8
L-
.__I
Fig. 1. Block diagram of a one-loop regulator system using a convertor as power stage.
20
1
Fig. 2. Bidirectional coupled-inductor duk converter.
L,=
L,= L z
condition n = k , zero current ripple will be obtained at
of a coupled inductor Cuk converter with the
the output and the need for output capacity C2 will be Fig. 3. Equivalent circuitcondition
n = k = 1.
completely eliminated as it was reported by Cuk in [41, [51.
The elimination of this capacitor results in a simplified
Equations (1) and (2) can be combined in only one
and extremely favorable loop-gain dynamics when this
converter is used in push-pull configuration, thus imple- bilinear expression:
menting a push-pull switching audio power amplifier
x = (Ax + a ) + (Bx b)u
(3)
[4]-[6]. Second, an additional order reduction can be
obtained if the magnetic coupling is perfect, i.e., k = 1, where
which results in only one equivalent inductor. Thus, this
U = 1
for
t I To,
paper covers the analysis and design of a nonlinearly
controlled bidirectional second-order converter suitable
u =0
for
TonI
t I
T
(4)
for large-signal applications.
+
11. BILINEAR
REPRESENTATION
AND LOCAL
x=
CONTROLLABILITY
Fig. 3 shows a? equivalent circuit of a bidirectional
coupled inductor Cuk converter with the condition n = k
= 1. Transistors and diodes have been assumed to be
ideal, therefore no parasitics or storage-time modulation
effects have been considered.
Because of the bidirectional current capability of the
switch, the discontinuous conduction mode does not take
place and therefore the switching converter can be represented by two piecewise-linear vector differential equations:
i =A,x
+ blVg
for
.i
= A,x
+ b2Vg
for
t I
Ton
TonI
t I
T
where X is the power-stage state vector and
input.
['; I
and matrices A , a, B , and b are given, respectively, by
(7)
(9)
(1)
(2) where 0 is the null matrix.
5 is the dc
(5)
The bilinear system described by (3) is locally controllable since the dimension of the Lie algebra generated by
vectors Ax + a and Bx is 2. To prove that [see Appendix],
it can be shown after tedious calculations that the Lie
43 1
MAJO et al.: LARGE-SIGNAL FEEDBACK CONTROL
algebra contains the vectors
I
W, = Bx
W,
=
[AX + a, Bx]
w,= [ A x + a , ( R x + a , Bx)]
which are related among them as follows.
I) W, and W, are linearly independent in the complementary of conic.
vg
F
c,, = {(im,ul)I - 2 ~ , i , u , + L,V,i,
-RC,I/,u,
11)
0)
*
W, and W, are linearly independent in the complementary of conic.
cI3=
{(im,u1)~z~(2 ~V ;, () ~ R C , )
+i,(R2ClV,
111)
=
+ L M V , )+ U1(3RC11/,)
=
0)
C,, n C,, represents a point in R2 where W,
and W, are linearly independent.
111. NONFINEAR
CONTROL
OF THE COUPLED
INDUCTOR
CUKCONVERTER
WITH
n = k = l
i
i
=
1
=
2
for
for
to, = 0
t;
CONDITION
Fig. 4. Block diagram of a large-signal feedback control of a bidirectional coupled inductor Cuk converter with n = k = I.
t I Ton
Ton4 t I T
t",
=
Ton
Considering the subinterval
(10) becomes
THE
< t < t;
(lo)
Expression (12) can be also written as a bilinear recurrence for x and 7 :
+7
x(t;+') = Hx(t;)
+ FX(t;)7 + G
(13)
432
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 39, NO. 5, OCTOBER 1992
sc3524
lOOK
4K7
,, K 1 2 =
I
I
-1.5"
TIE
4K7
+
LH74 1
+v
Fig. 5. Practical implementation of a coupled inductor Cuk converter: C, = 2.2 p F ; VR= 10 V; L ,
f, = 80 KHz; ( D )= 0.3; 0.1 < D < 0.5.
where
--
L
T
T
-
1--
c
F=
[
1
-
-
LC
L
T
1
f21
T
-E+=
T
g11
=
[gl,
z
u1(t;")
RC
T
fll
Lc
T2
( L -?E)&
T2
LC
+ - -T- ) &
RC
=
L,
=
llK9
3.25 mH;
Finally, introducing in (15) the following control recurrence:
T
1
Ct
llK9
T2
R2C2
-
c,
=
W [ u , ( t ; )- C,]
(17)
where C, represents an external reference and W is a
positive arbitrary constant less than 1, results in
T(t;>
-
-g12 - h2lim(t;)
+ Ul(t;)(W-
f 2 1 i,(t;>
h22) + CA1 - w
>
ff22Udt;)
( 18)
This nonlinear control law is represented by the block
diagram depicted in Fig. 4 and has been implemented as
shown in Fig. 5, where the complete bidirectional converter and its control circuit are depicted in detail.
MAJO et
433
LARGE-SIGNAL FEEDBACK CONTROL
:
o u t p u t Voltage (V)
-3::
-EiEEEEl
-5.5
-6
8
8.5
9
9.5
10.5
10
11
11.5
12
12.5
13
13.5
14
Input Voltage (V)
(a)
- 10
_~
- a
_____
__-
- 4 -
- 2
0
I
1
I
4
I
100
00
GO
40
20
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.0
0.8
Output C u r r e n t (A)
Fig. 7. Efficiency. 0 Measured value. --Interpolation curve.
Fig. 6(a) and (b) shows the regulation up and down of
the prototype, respectively. Fig. 7, in turn, represents the
obtained efficiency versus the output current. On the
other hand, Fig. 8 illustrates the excellent dynamic behavior of the regulation by following different types of variable reference. The measured bandwidth is 714 Hz.
Finally, Fig. 9 shows the output voltage behavior when
using a sinusoidal reference and the load has pulsating
characteristics, this being implemented as represented in
Fig. 10. The output voltage exhibits in this case a fast
recovery, i.e., only 5% of a half a cycle time and negligible
overshoot 10%.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The obtained results show the feasibility of a large-signal control of PWM complex converters. The technique
presented in the paper can be used to implement highperformance sinusoidal inverters or power amplifiers. It
434
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 39, NO. 5, OCTOBER 1992
r
Fig. 10. Practical implementation of the pulsating load.
must be remarked that the developed prototype has been
designed for low-power applications since our main interest was to verify the validity of the proposed control loop.
The control procedure can also be easily applied to highqrder converters such as the fourth-order bidirectional
Cuk converter as reported in reference [13]. In all cases,
the system performances are basically limited by the characteristics of the analog multiplier. In that sense, further
research is needed in order to simplify the number of
elements in the feedback path by implementing some of
the analog functions by means of digital circuits.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors want to express their acknowledgment to
Dr. E. Fossas for his helpful suggestions in the controllability analysis.
APPENDIX
(b)
Fig. 8. Output voltage under different types of control references (2
V/div. and 5 ms/div.). (a) Sinusoidal type. (b) Triangular type. Upper
waveform corresponds to reference voltage. Lower waveform corresponds to output voltage.
Considering the vector fields V and W whose coordinates are V(x)= Ax + a and W ( x ) = Bx, respectively, in
the usual base of R",the Lie derivate of the field W(x)
along V(x)is defined as
L;(X)
=
6W
[ V , W ] = -6VX-
6V
-W
6X
(Al)
or, in coordinates,
[ V , W ]= B ( A x + U ) - A ( B x ) .
The bilinear system described by (3) will be controllable
if and only if the Lie algebra generated by operators V
and W is of full rank in any operating point of the
converter [12]. Since, in this case, we analyze a secondorder system, the Lie algebra will be of full rank if its
dimension is 2.
In order to investigate a base of this algebra, we define
the set of vectors
{ W,> W,
9
w, ... 1
(A31
where
W, = W
Fig. 9. Output voltage with sinusoidal reference and pulsating load.
Upper waveform represents the pulsating behavior of the load. Lower
waveform corresponds to output voltage.
=
BX
(A41
+ U , Bx]
W,
=
[ V ,W ] = [ A x
W,
=
[V,[V,W]=
] [Ax
(W
+ u , [ h + u , B x ] ] (A6)
435
MAJO et ai.: LARGE-SIGNAL FEEDBACK CONTROL
If two vectors of this set are linearly independent, the
model will be controllable. On the other hand, the model
Will be uncontrollable if the following determinants are
zero:
det (W,, W,) = 0
(A7)
det(W,,W,) = 0
(‘48)
det(W2,W,) = 0
(A91
nal modelling and control in bidirectional switching converters,” in
Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems, ISCAS’91, Sin@
pore, June 11-14, 1991, pp. 1081-1084.
[14] A. Monin, “Contributions algebriques and topologiques B la representation des systemes non-lineaires,” Thkse de Doctorat. Universit6 Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, Dec. 1987.
Joan Maj6 graduated as Ingeniero Industrial in
1978, and received the Ph.D. degree in 1990,
both at the Universidad PolitCcnica de Cataluiia.
Since October 1978, he has been teaching at
the Escuela Universitaria PolitCcnica de Vilanova i la Geltri, where he is an Assistant Professor. His research interests are in the field of
control in power electronics, variable structure
systems, and modern control theory applied to
drive systems.
The analysis of this set of equations reveals that we can
always find two linearly independent vectors since W,, W,,
and W, are related among them as follows:
I> W, and W, are linearly independent in the complementary of conic.
c,,
2L,imu,
RC,I/,U, = 0)
W, and W, are linearly independent in the complementary of conic.
= {(im,Ul)l
+I,&&
11)
-
-
Luis Martinez graduated as Ingeniero de Telecomunicaci6n in 1978, and received the Ph.D.
degree in 1984, both at the Univeraidad
PolitCcnica de Catalufia.
Since October 1978, he has been teaching at
the Escuela TCcnica Superior de Ingenieros de
Telecomunicacidn of Barcelona, where he is an
Assistant Professor. His research interests are in
the field of analog circuit design and structure
and control of power conditioning systems.
c,, = { ( i , , , , u I ) ~ i ~ ( 2 ~ , ) u : ( ~ R c , )
-
+im(R2C&
111)
+ I,/&) + U1(3RC,V,)= 0)
C , , n C , , represents a point in R 2 where W,
and W, are linearly independent.
REFERENCES
[11 M. Valentin, “Contribution a I’analyse des convertisseurs statiques
et leur commande B fort signal,” Thtse d’Etat, UniversitC Paul
Sabatier, Toulouse, France, Dec. 1984.
121 G. Salut, J. C. Marpinard, and M. Valentin, “Large signal feedback control for power switching conversion,” in Proc. 1985 IEEE
PESC Conf. Rec., pp. 741-750.
131 S. Cuk, “Switching dc-to-dc converter with zero input or output
current ripple,” in Proc. IEEE Industry Applications Society Ann.
Mtg, Toronto, Canada, 1978, pp. 1131-1146.
141 S. Cuk and R. Erickson, “A conceptually new high-frequency
switched-mode amplifier technique eliminates current ripple,” in
Proc. 5th National Solid-state Power Conversion Conf., San Francisco, CA, 1978, pp. G.3.1-G.3.22.
[51 S. duk and R. D. Middlebrook. “Advances in switched-mode
power conversion. Part 11,” IEEE Trans. Industrial Electron., vol.
IE-30, pp. 19-29, Feb. 1983.
J. Fortuiio Mata and L. Salamero, Martinez, “Simplified models
for push-pull switching power amplifiers,” Electron. Lett., vol. 24,
no. 1, pp. 49-50, Jan. 1988.
A. Capel, J. C. Marpinard, G. Salut, M. Valentin, D. O’Sullivan, A.
Weinberg, N. Limbourg, and J. C. Rym, “A bidirectional highpower cell using large-signal feedback control with maximum current control for space applications,” ESA J., vol. 10, pp. 387-402,
1986.
M. Clique and A. J. Fossard, “Design of feedback laws for dc/dc
converters using modern control theory,” in Proc. 1978 IEEE
PESC Conf. Rec., pp. 2-11.
A. Poveda, J. Maj6, M. Valentin, L. Martinez, L. Garcia de
Vicufia, and F. Guinjoan, “Linear and nonlinear control of high
order converters after reducing the order by appropriate techniques,’’ in Proc. European Space Power Conf., Madrid, 1989, pp.
375-380.
J. C. Marpinard, P. Bidan, and J. M. Hernandez, “High speed
digital control of high frequency PWM converters,” in Proc. European Space Power Conf., Madrid, 1989, pp. 399-402.
1111 R. W. Brockett, “Nonlinear systems and differential geometry,”
Proc. IEEE, vol. 64, pp. 61-72, Jan. 1976.
“Lie algebras and Lie groups in control theory,” Geometric
1121 -,
Methods in System Theory D. Q. Mayne and R. W. Brockett, Eds.
Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973, pp. 43-82.
L. Martinez, J. Maj6, A. Poveda, L. Garcia de Vicufia, F. Guinjoan, A. F. Sinchez, J. C. Marpinard, and M. Valentin, “Large-sig-
Albert0 Poveda graduated as Ingeniero de Telecomunicaci6n in 1978, and received the Ph.D.
degree in 1988, both at the Universidad
Polittcnica de Catalufia.
He is an Assistant Professor in the Departamento de Ingenieria Electrbnica at the Escuela
Ttcnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicaci6n of Barcelona where he teaches analog
circuits and microprocessors. His research interests include analog circuit design and power
processing modeling, control, and simulation.
Luis Garcia de Vicuiia graduated as Ingeniero
de Telecomunicaci6n in 1980, and received the
Ph.D. degree in 1990, both at the Universidad
Polittcnica de Cataluiia. Docteur de I’Universitt
Paul Sabatier de Toulouse in 1992.
He is an Assistant Professor in the Departmento de Ingenieria Electr6nica at the Escuela
Universitaria PolitCcnica de Vilanova i la Geltri
where he teaches power electronics, analog circuits, and control theory. His research interests
are power processing electronics, design-oriented circuit analysis, and measurement techniques.
Francisco Guinjoan graduated as Ingeniero de
Telecomunicaci6n in 1984 and received the
Ph.D. degree in 1990, both at the Universidad
PolitCcnica de Cataluiia, Docteur de I’UniversitC
Paul Sabatier de Toulouse in 1992.
He is an Assistant Professor in the Departamento de Ingenieria Electrdnica at the Escuela
Universitaria PolitCcnica de Vilanova i la Geltri,
where he teaches analog circuits and control
theory. His research interests are power electronics modeling, nonlinear circuits analysis, and
analog circuit design.
I
436
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 39, NO. 5, OCTOBER 1992
Antonio F. Sanchez graduated as Ingeniero
TCcnico de Telecomunicaci6n in 1988 at the
Universidad Polittcnica de Cataluiia.
He is an Assistant Professor in the Departamento de Ingenieria Electr6nica at the Escuela
Universitaria PolitCcnica de Vilanova i la Geltri,
where he teaches analog circuits and power
electronics. His research interests are power
electronics, variable structure systems, and mode m control theory applied to drive systems.
Max Valentin was born in 1941. He took his
degree in physics at the University of Toulouse
and took his 3rd Cycle Thesis at the same University in 1974. He received the Ph.D. degree
(‘‘Thkse d’Etat”) in 1984, whose subject was
about PWM large signal control of power converters: classification of power cells and nonlinear feedback loop.
Since 1977, he has been doing research at
“Laboratoire d’Automatique et d h a l y s e des
Systkmes, LAAS-CNRS” (Toulouse). His main
interest is in power conditioning and in the mathematical modeling of
converters. He teaches electrotechnics and automatic contriol at the
University of Toulouse 111.
Jean Claude Marpinard was born in
Semblanqay, France, in 1938. He received the
degree in physics at the University of Toulouse
and the Ph.D. degree in the same university in
1967.
He presently holds a chair as Professor of
electrical engineering at the University Paul
Sabatier (Toulouse), where he is doing research
in the Laboratory of Automatic Control and
Systems Analysis (LAAS) of National Scientific
Research Center (CNRS) in Toulouse. His main
interest is in power conditioning and control as well as space applications with the support of the European Space Agency and Alcatel
Espace on electric/hybrid automotives control.