Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Matt Johnson HSU Wildlife 365 Ornithology ORNITHOLOGY (Humboldt State Univ. WILDLIFE 365) LECTURE 21 – MATING SYSTEMS II I. Monogamy con’t A. EPCs. Monogamy is not as monogamous as it sounds. 1. Many birds that appear monogamous, with overt pair bonds between 2 mates, actually copulate with other individuals. 2. Sometimes, these result from what are called "forced copulations." This is especially common in waterfowl, where drake ducks will forcefully copulate with hens. The males are behaving in a way to maximize their reproductive output. The females may resist if they have chosen the best mate they can, they their reproductive effort may be diluted by raising offspring fathered by some other, less deserving male. [Note: book erroneously calls this analogous to rape, but that’s horseshit. Human rape is about male insecurity and wrongly perceived power, bird forced copulations are about reproduction and maximizing fitness]. 3. More often than these forced copulations, however, are EPC's between, consenting adults, so to speak. a. The advantages of EPCs to both sexes lies in the value of "riskspreading" and "free young" i. Many nests just don't make it. Predators nail them. This is especially bad for monogamous bird species that, quite literally, have all their eggs in one basket. So, many birds of both sexes seek extra-pair copulations. ii. Also, remember that a bird can determine a baby birds genetic lineage by looking at it. So, they have no idea which chicks really are their own in the nest. So, by getting its genes into the nests of other parents, a bird’s young may be raised with very little of its own parental investment, but with significant investment from the unknowing foster parents. Thus, both sexes benefit from these “free young” – so both sexes seek extra-pair copulations. b. But....they sneak them. Why? First, they need to get the genes into the nest without both parents knowing. So a female will senak her egg in the nest of another’s (called egg dumping), and a male will sneak a copulation with another female (that “hopefully” will result in an egg – this is called cuckoldry). In addition, birds attempt to make such EPC’s unknown to their won mate…why? It all comes down to investment. c. Monogamy evolves when the parental effort of both parents is required for the successful raising of young. Both sexes must contribute to nest building, egg incubation, and/or chick rearing. They maximize their reproductive effort by cooperating. The more a single mate in a pair cheats, the more and more it is investing into other satellite nests and the less and less into its primary nest. d. Yet because cooperation is required to raise a brood, both males and females seek to ensure that they choose a mate that will indeed invest sufficiently into their reproductive effort. Thus, females "size up" the males.....and males also must judge during courtship how likely he alone will be the father of the chicks the cares for. So neither sex is benefited by choosing mates that obviously cheats. e. In short, there is a conflict. For BOTH sexes, an individual maximizes its reproductive output by simultaneously doing two things: (1) ensuring as much energy as possible is invested by itself and its mate into the primary nest, but also (2) getting its genes into some other nests just in case. Thus, natural selection operates such that each sex is benefited by choosing a faithful mate, to which it is somewhat unfaithful. 4. Cuckoldry and egg dumping. a. Cuckoldry is the case in which a male raises a chick that he has not fathered. It is common due to EPCs. Despite efforts to keep tabs on his mate, his neighbors are trying to mate with her, and studies have demonstrated that most nests contain one or more eggs not fathered by the male of the nest. b. Is there a benefit to the female in permitting cuckoldry? Depends on her mate. She does not benefit much by risk-spreading....regardless of who fathers her eggs in her nest...if it gets nailed by a predator, its gone. However, if she has not been able to pick a male of very high quality....then in behooves her to allow neighbors, which may be better fit than her mate, to copulate with her. 5. A good example of cuckoldry is in Purple Martins. a. Adult males return to breed first and choose the best sites in the "apartments." b. But then they start attracting inexperienced males as well as females. c. They cuckold the young males like crazy!!! d. The young males still benefit because without tagging along with the elder males, they likely not reproduce at all.....and also they keep returning to this apartment complex as a way to inherit the best spots when the elders die....then THEY start cuckolding. 6. So a female benefits from permitting cuckoldry only if her neighboring males are clearly better males than her own mate. But what can she do to spread her risk and get free young via EPC’s? – Egg Dumping. a. But she CAN spread her risk by laying eggs in the nests of other individuals. This is called egg dumping, and is not to be confused with nest parasitism (the former occurs within a species, that latter between species). b. Females often lay their eggs in the nests of other females when they aren't watching......regardless of who is the father of those eggs, it benefits the female. c. Is there an advantage to males of letting neighboring female lay her egg in his nest? If he’s mated with her you bet there is! Thus, females in some species foster covert relationships with heir male neighbors so that they can then better their chances of successfully egg dumping. d. Is there an advantage to females in letting their nests gets dumped into – hell no, they stop it if they can! II. A. B. C. D. E. III. A. B. IV. A. B. C. D. Role of ecology on mating system determination. Variations in mating systems reflect differences in the availability of resources -- food, nest sites, etc. Great example of this with African Weavers. Overhead. Generally, where both sexes’ participation is essential for raising young -- and if one sex cannot get enough resources by itself to support multiple nests -monogamy is the system. As a female’s ability to care for her young alone increases, polygny becomes a more viable option. So, under what conditions can females raise offspring on their own? 1. If resources are super abundant -- they don't need males, and thus males can maximize the repro output by mating with as many females as possible. a. Birds that nest in productive marshes are an example -- redwing blackbirds are polygynous. Each male defends a territory -- many females choose that territory, and the male fathers most of their offspring. Of the 14 species of songbirds that are polygamous in NA, 11 nest in freshwater marches. b. Tropical fruit-eating birds often have abundant resources, or at least predictable and easy to find. They are also often polygynous. 2. Also, if the young are able to feed themselves, then they require little investment (after hatching that is), and polygyny may result. 17% of species precocial young are polygynous or promiscuous, only 7% of species with altricial young are polygynous. Polygyny. Occurs often where territory quality varies dramatically, as in freshwater marshes. Males with the best territories attract the most females. But why should a female mate with an already paired male? Because she can do better mating with a polygynous male on a good territory than a faithful monogamous male on a poor territory -- food is so abundant that they can feed their own young on a good territory, they don't NEED the male. Polyandry. How these systems have evolved remains mysterious. The sandpipers are a good example. 15 species are monogamous, 3 are polyandrous, and 3 are polygynous. Linking these differences to species differences in ecology, length of breeding season, predictability of food, etc. have not been convincing.....so why? Still not sure. One possible explanation is that an evolutionary quirk in their history makes it impossible, physiologically, for a sandpiper to lay more than four eggs in a single clutch, whereas other birds' clutch sizes are more flexible over evolutionary time. Consequently, although many have evolved variances in clutch size in correspondence to environmental variation, sandpipers have not been able to do so. So, natural selection has operated instead to produce a bewildering variation in mating systems that, ultimately, is linked to ecological differences in the species, but we have yet to articulate them. V. Leks. -- Leks are courtship arenas that contain no important resources, but serve to congregate the population. A. What are they? -- Leks are areas where females come for one thing -fertilization. The males, in turn, compete intensively for opportunity to copulate, creating a conspicuous dominance hierarchy. In many situations, a handful of males will achieve 70-80% of al the matings. B. Evolution of leks. Why should males gather in leks such that only a few males wind up reproducing? Three hypotheses. 1. Reduced predation hypothesis. In species where competition for females has resulted in elaborate display dances, the males may put themselves at risk by dancing and not remaining vigilant of predators. They can reduce this risk by congregating, so that predator detection and avoidance is maximized in the group. Some support of this in that open country promiscuous birds are lekers, forest birds are not as often. 2. Hot Spot hypothesis -- males need to be "chosen" to maximize the breeding success. So they congregate in areas frequently used by females to maximize their chances of being seen. Perhaps, but in many cases the lekking grounds are nearly devoid of resources....so females would not be frequenting these areas w/o the males. 3. Hot shot hypothesis -- females are more likely to choose mates from large aggregations of males because they can more easily compare them. Thus, to even have a chance, the solitary males need to join leks. 4. Satellite displayers -- There is a wide variation in display abilities in males. The subordinate (often young ones) just don't do it well. So, they probably won't get chosen. But by joining a lek on the periphery as a satellite male, the benefit for two reasons: a. They can watch and learn - to maximize future repro opportunities. b. They can perhaps get lucky and engage in a forced or sneak copulation. C. Cooperative leks. A. This satellite male hypothesis is most prevalent in what are called cooperative leks, where a group of males perform a single display dance, but only one males actually copulates. B. Why do the dancers even bother? Because without cooperation, they have NO chance of breeding at all. With cooperation they can (1) learn the dance for future...and (2) if the lead dancer gets nailed by a predator, they can take over his position. Often the secondary dancers are young birds, and in cooperative lekking species, they often take several years to develop adult plumage. They wear their age.