Download Using an elevation gradient as a proxy indicator to understand

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Introduced species wikipedia , lookup

Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup

Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup

Biogeography wikipedia , lookup

Island restoration wikipedia , lookup

Unified neutral theory of biodiversity wikipedia , lookup

Fauna of Africa wikipedia , lookup

Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup

Bifrenaria wikipedia , lookup

Mission blue butterfly habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Assisted colonization wikipedia , lookup

Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup

Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup

Reconciliation ecology wikipedia , lookup

Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup

Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Habitat wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Ecological Snapshot of Beetle
Distribution on an Elevation
Gradient
Eric Kortenhoeven
Mentor: Dr. Neil Cobb
Hooper Undergraduate
Research Award
(HURA)
•
Introduction
Important tool to understand
effects of Climate Change on
biodiversity
• Current distribution of species
along an elevation gradient
• Can be used in the future to
track range shifts of organisms
• In response to climate change
(Gobbi et al., 2007)
• Distribution of beetles on the San
Francisco Peaks in Northern
Arizona
1783m3021m
H₁-Temperature
Mean Monthly Temperature oC (2003-2010)
H₁- There will be a decrease in species abundance and species
richness as temperature decreases at higher elevation sites
30
Desert
Grassland
PJ Woodland
Ponderosa Pine
Mixed Conifer
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5
Jan
Feb Mar
Apr May Jun
Jul
Aug Sep
Oct Nov Dec
(Merriam Powell Center for Environmental Research (MPCER))
H₂- Precipitation
H₂- There will be an increase in species abundance and species
richness as precipitation increases at higher elevation sites
Average Monthly Precip mm (2002-2010)
120
Mixed Conifer
Ponderosa Pine
PJ Woodland
Grassland
Desert
100
80
60
40
20
0
Jan
Feb Mar
Apr May Jun
Jul
Aug Sep
Oct Nov Dec
(Merriam Powell Center for Environmental Research (MPCER))
H₃- Narrow Niches
H₃- Most species will only occur in one habitat type, resulting in
unique beetle communities arranged along gradient
• Studies indicate that ground dwelling arthropods are highly
responsive (Rainio and Niemela, 2003)
• Changes in habitat (tree canopy vs intercanopy)
• Disturbance
• Species indicating habitat specificity (Rainio and Niemela, 2003)
• More threatened by climate change impacts upon habitat
Methods
• Pitfall traps were used to collect
ground dwelling arthropods
• 4/7 life zones
• 6 distinct habitats
• Grassland
• Pinyon Juniper (PJ)
• Ponderosa Pine Meadow (PIPO-O)
• Ponderosa Pine Forested (PIPO-F)
• Mixed Conifer Meadow (MC-O)
• Mixed Conifer Forested (MC-F)
Pitfall trap
Diversity
Spp. Richness of Lifezones
Number of Species
50
45
40
H₁ TemperatureSupported in Species
Richness
35
H₂ PrecipitationUnsupported in
Species Richness
30
25
20
15
10
H₃ Narrow Niches Not Applicable
5
0
Grassland
PJ
PIPO
MC
• 85 species identified on the San Francisco Peaks Elevation Gradient
• Grassland had highest diversity= 44 different species in that habitat
Abundance
Average Abundance
H₁ TemperatureSupported in Overall
Average Abundance
lower sites
Average # of
Individuals/Trap
25
20
15
H₂ PrecipitationSupported in Overall
Average Abundance
10
5
0
Grassland
PJ
PIPO
MC
• Mixed Conifer Habitat dominated by
Carabids
• Mostly species: Synuchus dubius
H₃ Narrow Niches Not Applicable
• H₃ Narrow Niches- Supported- Unique beetle communities
Elevation Profile
111
11
15
1
1
5
10
≈ 60% endemic
10
15
14
• H₃ Narrow Niches- Supported- About 60% - Endemic- more
threatened by climate change due to their specificity
Conclusion and Recommendations
• Beetle community composition changes along the
elevation gradient of the San Francisco Peaks
• Lower Elevations- Dominated by Tenebrionidae
• Upper Elevations- Dominated by Carabidae
• 60% of beetles found are endemic to specific habitats
• Use the presence data to construct species distribution
models (i.e. suitable habitat) for both present day and
future climate change scenarios.
Thank You
• NASA Space Grant
• Dr. Nadine Barlow
• Kathleen Stigmon
• Hooper Undergraduate Research Award (HURA)
• Dr. Neil Cobb- Mentor
• Colorado Plateau Museum for Arthropod Biodiversity
• Merriam-Powell Center for Environmental Research
• Jacob Higgins- Curator
• Emily Ellman- Field Volunteer
Questions?
Comments?
References
Gobbi, M., B. Rossaro, A. Vater, F. De Bernardi, M. Pelfini, and P.
Brandmayr. 2007. Environmental features influencing Carabid beetle
(Coleoptera) assemblages along a recently deglaciated area in the Alpine
region. Ecological Entomology 32:682-689.
Hodkinson, I. D. 2005. Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients:
species and community responses to altitude. Biological Reviews
80:489-513.
Rainio, J., & Niemela, J. (2003). Ground beetles ( Coleoptera :
Carabidae ) as bioindicators, (McGeoch 1998), 487-506.