Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
• Quantum Hall effect • Classic (3D) EH = E y = − • Bz, Ex in a conductor! jx Bz ne ! = ρ!j E resistivity tensor ρyx = −ρxy = Bz Ey =− ne jx Hall resistivity, transverse Hall coefficient RH = Ey 1 =− jx Bz ne 51 • Quantum Hall effect • 2D electron gas field independent magnetoresistivity d ! λF (e.g AlGaAS/GaAS modulation doped heterostructure) ρxy = − transverse magnetoresistivity • Inverting eqs. Bz me ; ρxx = − na e na e2 τ areal electron density average time between collisions ρxx = ρyy ; ρxy = −ρyx conductivity tensor jx = σxx Ex + σxy Ey jy = σyx Ex + σyy Ey σxx = ρxx −ρxy ; σxy = 2 2 + ρxy ρxx + ρ2xy ρ2xx •But at B ! (low T) ! steps in Hall resistivity, different behaviour !! (ωc τ >> 1 , !ωc >> kB T ) ωc = eB me INTEGER QUANTUM HALL EFFECT cyclotron resonance frequency 52 • Quantum Hall effect INTEGER QUANTUM HALL EFFECT • Integer QH effect (von Klitzing et al, 1980 for Si MOSFET) transverse 2 longitudinal 3 4 10 8 6 5 53 • Quantum Hall effect •Values of Hall resistivity quantized in units of(h/e2 = 25812, 807Ω ! 26 kΩ) ρxy = −h pe2 p = 1, 2, 3... •and sharp peaks in ρxx (B) in the jumps ; (" Shubnikov-de Haas effect) •ρxx = 0 • in the B ranges of the plateaux ρxy != 0 , ρxx → 0 , σxx → 0 , zero longitudinal resistance •Steps more evident at B ! •Explanation " 2D behaviour of Landau levels 54 (explained later) Nobel Prize 1985 • Quantum Hall effect Skipping cyclotron orbits Four-terminal sample configuration to measure the Hall and longitudinal resistivities 55 • Quantum Hall effect ρxx = 0 , ρxy != 0 ⇒ not a perfect conductor, electrons move with zero longitudinal resistance. •For a given plateau •Electron cyclotron orbits confined to edges of the sample: skipping orbits do not permit back-scattering !edge-channel transport resistanceless !Relationship between edge states and contacts analogous to quantized point-contact conductance (Landauer formalism) 56 • Quantum Hall effect • Landau levels (3D behavior) free movement in z direction (B) •B in 3D electron gas !collapse of allowed k states onto Landau tubes. !allowed energy levels: !modified DOS (as in 1D) !n = !2 kz2 1 + (n + )!ωc 2me 2 n = 0, 1, 2.... eB cyclotron resonance frequency me and other properties: Shubnikov de Haas effect •Discrete energy levels ! oscillations in magnetization 57 ωc = • Quantum Hall effect • 2D behaviour of Landau levels 1 ! = !1 + (n + )!ωc ± µB B Zeeman energy, 2 spin ground-state level for the well quantized n Landau level +- for spin Bohr magneton µB = e! 2me •DOS: series of delta functions, spin doublet for every Landau level •When m!c = me , !ωc = 2µB B ωc = cyclotron effective eB mass , Zeeman m!c (spin) and cyclotron splitting the same •B !!degeneracy per unit area of Landau levels, gn ωc ↑ , gn = eB ↑⇒ QH effect from µB (B) dependence h Levels move upwards in energy chemical potential 58 • Quantum Hall effect • µB (B) , dependenceof chemical potential with magnetic field B2 > B1 •Consider 2D (density na) e- gas in B, with n=2 ! Landau level halffilled ! µ pinned to n=2 ! position. •Increase B : B ↑⇒ !2↑ ↑ , ⇒ µ ↑ but gn(<2) ↑ ! the part-filled level must be depleted of electrons ! µ# discontinuously to 1# ! Discontinuous jumps in µ(B) whenever an integral number of Landau levels are completly occupied 59 • Quantum Hall effect • Condition: ! na = p , integer gn ! Bp = ! hgn hna = e pe ρxy = − Bp h =− 2 na e pe σxx = 0 , since g("F ) = 0 when all Landau levels completely empty or completely filled 60 • Quantum Hall effect • But this picture doesn’t account for the ranges of B corresponding to the plateaux. ! Disorder in the 2D system (structural defects at heterojunction) • Two effects: ! - Bands in g(!) broadened. - electron states spatially localized (high disorder) ! µ(B) oscillatory but smoothly varying When µ(B) in band of localized states ! “Fermi glass”, σxx = 0 in a B range (T=0) no hopping conduction • Very high B (only one Landau level)! integral QH disappears, but p=n/m !FRACTIONAL QH EFFECT n, m integers, n<m 61 • Quantum Hall effect • Fractional or non-integer QH effect 62 • Quantum Hall effect •Very different mechanism to integer QH. •Due to e--e - interactions in 2D ! “Incompressible quantum fluid” For fractional Landau filling factor p=1/m, quasiparticle excitations have charge Q=e/m fraction of electronic charge •Theory ! Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395 (1982) • Nobel Prize with Stormer & Tsui, 1998 •Experimental confirmation ! - de Picciotto et al., Nature 38, 168 (1997) - Saminadeyar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2526 (1997) Measurement of noise in the current through a constrictionof a 2D gas at high B (fig. next page) 63 • Quantum Hall effect •Split-gate electrode ! 1D confinemrnt of 2D electron gas (QP contact) Shot noise weak pinch off,, p=1/3 fitted to eq. of ∆(I 2 ) only is Q=e/3 assumed Strong pinch-off e/3 weak pinch-off 64 • Quantum Hall effect •No uniform flow of charge carriers ! fluctuations in number of carriers (shot noise) ∆(I 2 ) = 2QI0 ∆f ! determine Q frequency average interval current (Approximate for T=0 and weak transmission) •More generally, ∆(I 2 ) = 2Gt(1 − t)∆f [QV coth(QV /2kB T ) − 2kB T ] + 4kB T G0 t∆f G0 = Qe/h V t quantized conductance thermal noise (Nyquist theorem) applied voltage transmission •Two regimes, depending on Vg: 1.- Vg# (weak pinch-off)" 2D gas between two electrodes 2.- Vg! (strong pinch-off) "tunnel of electrons in multiples of e (2D gas separated in two) 65 • Applications Possible assignments for final presentations... •Semiconductor transistors (bipolar, field-effect, modulation-doped devices) •Opto-electronic devices (solar cells, photodetectors, lightemitting diodes, semiconductor lasers) 66 • Summary •We have studied the main features taking place when two different materials (metal or semiconductors) are put into contact, paying attention to the current conduction through the junction.They have important applications for electronic devices. •The effects of confinement in thin slabs produce discrete states which change the optical absorption pattern with respect to the bulk, and make them interesting for optoelectronic devices. •Artificial structures can be prepared by MBE, producing periodic arrays of two alternate materials. The period and width can be tuned to produce multiple QWs or superlattices, which have very different properties from bulk materials. Using gradual doping, nipi structures are produced with interesting photoluminiscence properties. •Finally we have studied the effect of magnetic fields on 2D electron gas structures, giving rise to Landau levels, and we have described the integer and fractional quantum Hall effect. 67